| Revision as of 07:15, 18 October 2007 editEv (talk | contribs)13,000 editsm Rv edit by Kaaveh Ahangar to last version by Ev, thus removing unnecesary double naming & unsourced text (see Talk:Shatt al-Arab#On the historic use of Arvand← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:42, 19 October 2007 edit undoKaaveh Ahangar~enwiki (talk | contribs)3,130 edits Undid revision 165360054 by Ev (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | {{Infobox_river | river_name = Shatt al-Arab/Arvand Rūd | ||
| :''In ] literature the name "Arvand" refers to the ] river''. | |||
| ⚫ | {{Infobox_river | river_name = Shatt al-Arab | ||
| | image_name = Shat Al-Arab-Basra.jpg | | image_name = Shat Al-Arab-Basra.jpg | ||
| | caption = Shatt al-Arab near ], ] (Iran is on the left of the photo) |
| caption = Shatt al-Arab near ], ] (known as Arvand Rud in Iran which is on the left of the photo) | ||
| | origin = ], ] and ] | | origin = ], ] and ] | ||
| | mouth = ] | | mouth = ] | ||
| | basin_countries = ], ] | | basin_countries = ], ] | ||
| | length = |
| length =200 km | ||
| | elevation = | | elevation = | ||
| | mouth_elevation =0 | | mouth_elevation =0 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 12: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| The '''Shatt al-Arab''' (]: شط العرب, literally ''Coast of the Arabs''), or the '''Arvand Rūd''' (]: اروندرود, literally ''Arvand River''), is a ] in ] of some 200 km (125 mi) in length, formed by the confluence of the ] and the ] in the town of |
The '''Shatt al-Arab''' (]: شط العرب, literally ''Coast of the Arabs''), or the '''Arvand Rūd''' (]: اروندرود, literally ''Arvand River''), is a ] in ] of some 200 km (125 mi) in length, formed by the confluence of the ] and the ] in the town of al-Qurnah in the ] of southern ]. The southern end of the river constitutes the border between Iraq and ] down to the mouth of the river as it discharges into the ]. It varies in width from about 760 feet (232 m) at ] to 0.5 mile (0.8 km) at its mouth. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geologic time, with the Tigris and Euphrates originally emptying into the ] via a channel further to the west. | ||
| The ] river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of ] into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable. | The ] river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of ] into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable. | ||
| In ] literature and the '']'', the name "Arvand" is used for the Tigris. Iranians begun using this name for the Shatt al-Arab during the later ], and continue to do so after the ].<ref>]'s .</ref> | |||
| ==Territorial disputes== | ==Territorial disputes== | ||
| The use of the name '''Arvand''' for this river goes back to the ] <ref>, </ref>. From the ] (559 BC) until the ] in 1747, the river was for a long time part of the territories of the ] and was called the Arvand<ref>, </ref>. "Arvand" often changes to "Alvand"<ref> </ref>, and "Alvand" to "al-Wand" and then to the Arabic "Hulwan".<ref>Bagley, F. R. C. (1985) "Review: ''Iraq and Iran: The Years of Crisis'' by J. M. Abdulghani" ''International Affairs'' (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 61(3): p. 542</ref> | |||
| Conflicting territorial claims and disputes over navigation rights between Iran and Iraq were among the main factors for the ] that lasted from 1980 to 1988, when the pre-1980 status quo was restored. The Iranian cities of ] and ] and the Iraqi city and major port of ] are situated along this river. | Conflicting territorial claims and disputes over navigation rights between Iran and Iraq were among the main factors for the ] that lasted from 1980 to 1988, when the pre-1980 status quo was restored. The Iranian cities of ] and ] and the Iraqi city and major port of ] are situated along this river. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 28: | ||
| ==Recent conflicts== | ==Recent conflicts== | ||
| ] city, |
] city,Iraq]] | ||
| In the ], the waterway was a key military target for the Coalition Forces. Since it is the only outlet to the Persian Gulf, its capture was important in delivering humanitarian aid to the rest of the country, and also to stop the flow of illegal smuggling operations. The British ] staged an amphibious assault to capture the key oil installations and shipping docks located at ] on the ] at the onset of the conflict. | In the ], the waterway was a key military target for the Coalition Forces. Since it is the only outlet to the Persian Gulf, its capture was important in delivering humanitarian aid to the rest of the country, and also to stop the flow of illegal smuggling operations. The British ] staged an amphibious assault to capture the key oil installations and shipping docks located at ] on the ] at the onset of the conflict. | ||
| Following the end of the war the UK was given responsibility, subsequently mandated by ] ], to patrol the waterway and the area of the ] surrounding the river mouth. They are tasked to make sure that ships in the area are not being used to transport munitions into Iraq. British forces have also trained Iraqi naval units to take over the responsibility of guarding their waterways. | Following the end of the war the UK was given responsibility, subsequently mandated by ] ], to patrol the waterway and the area of the ] surrounding the river mouth. They are tasked to make sure that ships in the area are not being used to transport munitions into Iraq. British forces have also trained Iraqi naval units to take over the responsibility of guarding their waterways. | ||
| On two separate occasions, Iranian forces operating on the Shatt al-Arab have captured British ] sailors who they claim have trespassed into their territory. | On two separate occasions, Iranian forces operating on the Iranian side of the Shatt al-Arab have captured British ] sailors who they claim have trespassed into their territory. | ||
| * In ], several British servicemen were held for ] after purportedly straying into the Iranian side of the waterway. After being initially threatened with prosecution, they were released after high-level conversations between British Foreign Secretary, ], and Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, ]. The initial hardline approach was put down to power struggles within the Iranian government. The British marines' weapons and boats were confiscated. | * In ], several British servicemen were held for ] after purportedly straying into the Iranian side of the waterway. After being initially threatened with prosecution, they were released after high-level conversations between British Foreign Secretary, ], and Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, ]. The initial hardline approach was put down to power struggles within the Iranian government. The British marines' weapons and boats were confiscated. | ||
| *In ], a ] became a major diplomatic crisis between the two nations. It was resolved after thirteen days when the Iranians unexpectedly released the captives under an "amnesty". | *In ], a ] became a major diplomatic crisis between the two nations. It was resolved after thirteen days when the Iranians unexpectedly released the captives under an "amnesty". | ||
Revision as of 00:42, 19 October 2007
River| Shatt al-Arab | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Physical characteristics | |
| Mouth | Persian Gulf |
| • elevation | 0 units? |
| Length | 200 km |
The Shatt al-Arab (Arabic: شط العرب, literally Coast of the Arabs), or the Arvand Rūd (Persian: اروندرود, literally Arvand River), is a river in Southwest Asia of some 200 km (125 mi) in length, formed by the confluence of the Euphrates and the Tigris in the town of al-Qurnah in the Basra Governorate of southern Iraq. The southern end of the river constitutes the border between Iraq and Iran down to the mouth of the river as it discharges into the Persian Gulf. It varies in width from about 760 feet (232 m) at Basra to 0.5 mile (0.8 km) at its mouth. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geologic time, with the Tigris and Euphrates originally emptying into the Persian Gulf via a channel further to the west.
The Karun river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of silt into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable.
Territorial disputes
The use of the name Arvand for this river goes back to the Avesta . From the Achaemenid Empire (559 BC) until the Afsharid dynasty in 1747, the river was for a long time part of the territories of the Persian Empire and was called the Arvand. "Arvand" often changes to "Alvand", and "Alvand" to "al-Wand" and then to the Arabic "Hulwan".
Conflicting territorial claims and disputes over navigation rights between Iran and Iraq were among the main factors for the Iraq-Iran War that lasted from 1980 to 1988, when the pre-1980 status quo was restored. The Iranian cities of Abadan and Khorramshahr and the Iraqi city and major port of Basra are situated along this river.
Control of the waterway and its use as a border have been a source of contention between the predecessors of the Iranian and Iraqi states since a peace treaty signed in 1639 between the Persian and the Ottoman Empires, which divided the territory according to tribal customs and loyalties, without attempting a rigorous land survey. The tribes on both sides of the lower waterway, however, are Marsh Arabs, and the Ottoman Empire claimed to represent them. Tensions between the opposing empires that extended across a wide range of religious, cultural and political conflicts, led to the outbreak of hostilities in the 19th century and eventually yielded the Second Treaty of Erzurum between the two parties, in 1847, after protracted negotiations, which included British and Russian delegates. Even afterwards, backtracking and disagreements continued, until British Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, was moved to comment in 1851 that "the boundary line between Turkey and Persia can never be finally settled except by an arbitrary decision on the part of Great Britain and Russia". A protocol between the Young Turks and the Persians was signed in Constantinople in 1913, but World War I canceled all plans.
The British advisors in Iraq were able to keep the waterway bi-national under the thalweg principle that has worked in Europe (see Danube River): the dividing line was the line of steepest descent along the stream bed. All United Nations attempts to intervene as mediators were rebuffed. Under Saddam Hussein, Baathist Iraq claimed the entire waterway up to the Iranian shore as its territory. But in 1975, Iraq signed the Algiers Accord in which it recognized a series of straight lines closely approximating the thalweg (deepest channel) of the waterway, as the official border. In 1980, Hussein released a statement claiming to abrogate the treaty that he signed, and Iraq invaded Iran. (International law, however, holds in all cases that any bi-lateral or multi-lateral treaty cannot be abrogated by only one party.) The main thrust of the military movement on the ground was across the waterway which was the stage for most of the military battles between the two armies. The waterway was Iraq's only outlet to the Persian Gulf, and thus, its shipping lanes were greatly affected by continuous Iranian attacks. When the Al-Faw peninsula was captured by the Iranians in 1987, Iraq's shipping activities virtually came to a halt and had to be diverted to other Arab ports, such as Kuwait and even Aqaba, Jordan. Later, and as the Persian Gulf War was looming, Saddam again recognized the Algiers Accord in order to appease Iranians before he could undertake an invasion of Kuwait.
Recent conflicts
In the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the waterway was a key military target for the Coalition Forces. Since it is the only outlet to the Persian Gulf, its capture was important in delivering humanitarian aid to the rest of the country, and also to stop the flow of illegal smuggling operations. The British Royal Marines staged an amphibious assault to capture the key oil installations and shipping docks located at Umm Qasr on the al-Faw peninsula at the onset of the conflict.
Following the end of the war the UK was given responsibility, subsequently mandated by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1723, to patrol the waterway and the area of the Persian Gulf surrounding the river mouth. They are tasked to make sure that ships in the area are not being used to transport munitions into Iraq. British forces have also trained Iraqi naval units to take over the responsibility of guarding their waterways.
On two separate occasions, Iranian forces operating on the Iranian side of the Shatt al-Arab have captured British Royal Navy sailors who they claim have trespassed into their territory.
- In June 2004, several British servicemen were held for two days after purportedly straying into the Iranian side of the waterway. After being initially threatened with prosecution, they were released after high-level conversations between British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, and Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kamal Kharrazi. The initial hardline approach was put down to power struggles within the Iranian government. The British marines' weapons and boats were confiscated.
- In 2007, a seizure of fifteen more British personnel became a major diplomatic crisis between the two nations. It was resolved after thirteen days when the Iranians unexpectedly released the captives under an "amnesty".
See also
References
- West, Edward William (trans.) (1901) "Bahman Yast" Pahlavi Texts Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, p. 216, note 3, OCLC 83687570
- West, Edward William (trans.) (1901) "Bahman Yast" Pahlavi Texts Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, p. 216, note 3, OCLC 83687570
- Lenormant, Francois (September 1881) "Ararat and 'Eden" The Contemporary Review 40: p.463
- Bagley, F. R. C. (1985) "Review: Iraq and Iran: The Years of Crisis by J. M. Abdulghani" International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 61(3): p. 542
External links
30°24′26″N 48°09′06″E / 30.40722°N 48.15167°E / 30.40722; 48.15167
Categories: