Misplaced Pages

User talk:Brendan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:26, 24 October 2007 editBrendan (talk | contribs)1,523 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:36, 24 October 2007 edit undoTimeshift9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers67,126 edits commentNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


<!-- NEW TOPICS BELOW HERE --> <!-- NEW TOPICS BELOW HERE -->

{{ANI-notice}}

You can check out the 3RR page on the way. You know where it is :) ] <sup> -(])</sup> 08:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

::Brendan, the ] article is now locked. When it is unlocked, I think it would be best to stay away from it for a day or two, to avoid a block. Even if you feel strongly about the issue, a day away from it won't change things much. BTW, here's the ]. Cheers, --''']''' 12:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

:::Do you have no further comments? Some sort of communication would be appreciated as to whether you have changed your view considering three admins and other wikipedians have expressed via Rudd's talk page that there is no issue with the image? ] 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:36, 24 October 2007

⇒ Start a new Talk topic



Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You can check out the 3RR page on the way. You know where it is :) Prester John 08:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Brendan, the Kevin Rudd article is now locked. When it is unlocked, I think it would be best to stay away from it for a day or two, to avoid a block. Even if you feel strongly about the issue, a day away from it won't change things much. BTW, here's the link to Prester's 3RR report. Cheers, --Lester 12:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you have no further comments? Some sort of communication would be appreciated as to whether you have changed your view considering three admins and other wikipedians have expressed via Rudd's talk page that there is no issue with the image? Timeshift 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)