| Revision as of 04:01, 28 October 2007 editThuranX (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers20,147 edits →Please be aware:: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:06, 28 October 2007 edit undoJmegill (talk | contribs)779 edits →Please be aware:: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Your edit history's starting to make you look like an ]. Your edits to Huckabee are sometimes good, but others, ncluding the harvesting of every single statement he's ever been criticized for, are starting to look like you have an anti-Huckabee bias. I'm not going to cite policies here, you know them already, but I seriously recommend you find some other topics to work on. going after every thing about Huckabee's mouth and the troubles it causes is not the best way you can help out on the article. The article needs more substantiation in his political positions, and there are plenty of other candidates and non-politics topics you could look into. Just a friendy note, branch out a bit. ] 04:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | Your edit history's starting to make you look like an ]. Your edits to Huckabee are sometimes good, but others, ncluding the harvesting of every single statement he's ever been criticized for, are starting to look like you have an anti-Huckabee bias. I'm not going to cite policies here, you know them already, but I seriously recommend you find some other topics to work on. going after every thing about Huckabee's mouth and the troubles it causes is not the best way you can help out on the article. The article needs more substantiation in his political positions, and there are plenty of other candidates and non-politics topics you could look into. Just a friendy note, branch out a bit. ] 04:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I am trying to look at everything Huckabee has done. I have tried to find criticism, but not all the critical links are not necessarily added to the article. I posted many of the links in the discussion section. I have also paid for access to newspaper archives to see what he has said in the past. Some of the issues like school consolidation, the details of health care expansion and fiscal record merit more attention. ] 07:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:06, 28 October 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Jmegill, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --DLand 02:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Rudy Giuliani's lawsuit against gun manufacturers
Her are additional references to his lawsuit, as mayor, against gun manufacturers: Dogru144 05:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Reading your summary... just so you know, the edits were not vandalism under Misplaced Pages standards. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. I'm not disputing the revert, just the words you choose to describe the changes. Try not to bite the newcomers. :-) Morphh 23:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
References
I wanted to compliment you on your diligence in adding references. One thing that I thought might help, if you're not aware, is the citation templates, particularly {{cite web}} and {{cite news}}. They provide the standard formating and fields that are required for achieving high quality articles. Morphh 20:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Please be aware:
Your edit history's starting to make you look like an WP:SPA. Your edits to Huckabee are sometimes good, but others, ncluding the harvesting of every single statement he's ever been criticized for, are starting to look like you have an anti-Huckabee bias. I'm not going to cite policies here, you know them already, but I seriously recommend you find some other topics to work on. going after every thing about Huckabee's mouth and the troubles it causes is not the best way you can help out on the article. The article needs more substantiation in his political positions, and there are plenty of other candidates and non-politics topics you could look into. Just a friendy note, branch out a bit. ThuranX 04:01, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- I am trying to look at everything Huckabee has done. I have tried to find criticism, but not all the critical links are not necessarily added to the article. I posted many of the links in the discussion section. I have also paid for access to newspaper archives to see what he has said in the past. Some of the issues like school consolidation, the details of health care expansion and fiscal record merit more attention. Jmegill 07:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)