Misplaced Pages

Talk:King's Daughters: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:23, 29 October 2007 edit132.211.195.143 (talk) French prostitutes← Previous edit Revision as of 23:25, 29 October 2007 edit undo132.211.195.143 (talk) French prostitutesNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
== French prostitutes == == French prostitutes ==


If there is at least one prostitute among these fine young ladies then we are no longer speaking of "Rumors and urban legends." If there is at least one prostitute among these fine young ladies then we are no longer speaking of "Rumors and urban legends." The article claims only one was "charged"; that hardly aquits these pure-woolly "women."

Revision as of 23:25, 29 October 2007

Warning

To whoever keeps trolling on this page, if this continues, I will block the entire range you edit from. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


Leaving two references for people to see

Looking at the talk page history there seems to have been an edit war which has at this point led to an empty talk page even though it dates back to October 2005; which is about 2 years. To avoid such things take a look at it and learn from the past. YoSoyGuapo 00:39, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The "edit war" you describe has simply been a random series of troll posts that added nothing to the discussion of the article and in many cases were simply vandalism. They were removed for that reason.
The first link you listed is already part of the "External links" section. I will add the second one. -- Couillaud 13:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

French prostitutes

If there is at least one prostitute among these fine young ladies then we are no longer speaking of "Rumors and urban legends." The article claims only one was "charged"; that hardly aquits these pure-woolly "women."