Revision as of 01:33, 6 November 2007 view sourceFnagaton (talk | contribs)3,957 edits rv block evading sock pupper of user:Sarene← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:41, 6 November 2007 view source Alexandria (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,500 edits →RE Sarenne's latest: blockedNext edit → | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::::::Received the following today from NS: "I am not Sarenne but NotSarenne. Would you please either tell Sarenne who has contacted you, according to a comment of yours, my email address, forward this mail to him or tell me his so I can contact him? As you are convinced that I am the same person this would not be a privacy violation or the like in either case." Gee, I guess I was wrong. ;-) --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 22:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | ::::::::Received the following today from NS: "I am not Sarenne but NotSarenne. Would you please either tell Sarenne who has contacted you, according to a comment of yours, my email address, forward this mail to him or tell me his so I can contact him? As you are convinced that I am the same person this would not be a privacy violation or the like in either case." Gee, I guess I was wrong. ;-) --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 22:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::Received an email titled "NotSarenne" from somebody at hushmail.com. Deleted it without opening since I cannot be bothered reading whatever rubbish was inside it. Eventually Sarenne will get sick and tired of sending these. ''']]''' 22:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | :::::::::Received an email titled "NotSarenne" from somebody at hushmail.com. Deleted it without opening since I cannot be bothered reading whatever rubbish was inside it. Eventually Sarenne will get sick and tired of sending these. ''']]''' 22:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
<div class="user-block"> ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''{{{time|time}}}'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Harassment of a blocked user.|'''Harassment of a blocked user.'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|<font face="comic sans ms">] <small>]</small></font> 05:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> | |||
Just because someone is blocked does not give you fair right to make fun of them. Be thankful it's not longer. <font face="comic sans ms">] <small>]</small></font> 05:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:41, 6 November 2007
Attention: Unless otherwise requested I will answer messages here on my talk page to keep conversations together in one block, it is my hope this will make it easier for others to read them.
Messages
RE Sarenne's latest
Amazing to see Sarenne self destruct like this at the end. He almost had an admin convinced on his notSarenne talk page that he could contribute to Misplaced Pages in general (just not kib/mib/etc. stuff) Then he went ahead with the usual edit war from multiple ip's and all the calling me a terrorist and threatening me with an ak47, and even that harrasment of an admin on his own page. Wow, that's really out there behavior. --Marty Goldberg 22:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- It makes me laugh because Sarenne self destructed like this the last time he was blocked. ;) Fnagaton 22:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- I would probably keep your sockpuppet documentation page and add everything that transpired today to it. Including the block of nonSarenne for being a Sarenne sock puppet as well as all the edit warring, threats, etc. he did. Makes a handy reference to point admins to if he disappears for a few months again and comes back again. --Marty Goldberg 22:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, it is all very good evidence. Fnagaton 22:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- I just got an email from Sarenne claiming that NotSarenne was not his sock, and that he has only ever edited using the username Sarenne, never from any anon IP. How sad indeed that I have gotten the wrong guy. <rolls eyes> -- But|seriously|folks 01:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Haha. Yah, "I'm emailing you out of the blue to say its not me. Don't ask how I knew something was going on involving me, or why I've suddenly decided to email you after I...he was banned. The timing is just coincidental. And you should really reinstate me-I mean him, and forget the harassment of editors and admins, the threats, and edit warring from multiple ip's after being blocked. Because he is not me and I am not him and we are not them. I am notSarenne, goo goo g'joob." --Marty Goldberg 02:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's pretty much what I got out of it. He's been banned for six months but he was so disturbed by the wrongful accusations against NS that he took the time to email me to tell me so. It reminds me of the old "Final Record Offer" bit by Robert Klein: "My name is Conrad Jarvis, and I've been dead for six years. But this record offer is so spectacular I had to come back to tell you about it!" -- But|seriously|folks 03:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's always good to login and see something really funny to make Monday mornings better. :) Thank you for keeping the Sarenne sock puppet report up to date Marty. Fnagaton 11:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Received the following today from NS: "I am not Sarenne but NotSarenne. Would you please either tell Sarenne who has contacted you, according to a comment of yours, my email address, forward this mail to him or tell me his so I can contact him? As you are convinced that I am the same person this would not be a privacy violation or the like in either case." Gee, I guess I was wrong. ;-) -- But|seriously|folks 22:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Received an email titled "NotSarenne" from somebody at hushmail.com. Deleted it without opening since I cannot be bothered reading whatever rubbish was inside it. Eventually Sarenne will get sick and tired of sending these. Fnagaton 22:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Received the following today from NS: "I am not Sarenne but NotSarenne. Would you please either tell Sarenne who has contacted you, according to a comment of yours, my email address, forward this mail to him or tell me his so I can contact him? As you are convinced that I am the same person this would not be a privacy violation or the like in either case." Gee, I guess I was wrong. ;-) -- But|seriously|folks 22:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Just because someone is blocked does not give you fair right to make fun of them. Be thankful it's not longer. Kwsn (Ni!) 05:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)