| Revision as of 15:10, 16 November 2007 editDtobias (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,883 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:30, 16 November 2007 edit undoAcademy Leader (talk | contribs)536 edits note of supportNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :::I do that on occasion, when I realize my recent activity here has been almost entirely debate-related rather than actually improving the encyclopedia; hitting "Random" a few times usually finds articles that can be copyedited. Any other suggestions of productive things to do to get out of a rut? ] 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | :::I do that on occasion, when I realize my recent activity here has been almost entirely debate-related rather than actually improving the encyclopedia; hitting "Random" a few times usually finds articles that can be copyedited. Any other suggestions of productive things to do to get out of a rut? ] 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Hey PM, | |||
| I noticed your recent drama and just wanted to say I was entirely sympathetic to you. Like you, I created this SPA account so as not to let my "political" opinions get in the way of my editing activities. However, I didn't care about publicly revealing my old account when asked about it, as I was dealing with a different set of people than I was previously, and when I resumed editing articles under that handle I rather more rigorously kept this account confined to policy discussions, so less "drama," as it were, seems attracted to me. Still, I support your basic "right to privacy," to the extent the concept exists in any practical way in an environment such as this.—]<sup><small><font color="BrightRed">]</font></small></sup> 18:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:30, 16 November 2007
Feel free to leave a comment or start a discussion below - thanks for dropping by;
- Sounds good to me, this user account is expressive but not disruptive. Thanks, SqueakBox 02:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Squeak, we've not been around each other too much, but yours is a voice I respect - Privatemusings 02:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back... don't do anything I wouldn't do! :-) *Dan T.* 02:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
It's doing things you would do that got me into this mess! - thanks for the note though... Privatemusings 02:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have seen trusted admins screw-up and say as a penalty they will do such and such that everyone agrees is good for creating an encyclopedia. You would prove a lot if you would undertake to unambiguously act to improve the encyclopedia. Ask others for what such acts might be if you have doubts. Hint: red links. WAS 4.250 06:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- For every typo... I try and correct two via Special:Random. :) Mercury 15:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I do that on occasion, when I realize my recent activity here has been almost entirely debate-related rather than actually improving the encyclopedia; hitting "Random" a few times usually finds articles that can be copyedited. Any other suggestions of productive things to do to get out of a rut? *Dan T.* 15:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey PM,
I noticed your recent drama and just wanted to say I was entirely sympathetic to you. Like you, I created this SPA account so as not to let my "political" opinions get in the way of my editing activities. However, I didn't care about publicly revealing my old account when asked about it, as I was dealing with a different set of people than I was previously, and when I resumed editing articles under that handle I rather more rigorously kept this account confined to policy discussions, so less "drama," as it were, seems attracted to me. Still, I support your basic "right to privacy," to the extent the concept exists in any practical way in an environment such as this.—AL 18:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)