Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Policy/Procedure for changing this policy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Policy Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:28, 31 March 2005 editGrunt (talk | contribs)8,638 edits Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Procedure for changing this policy moved to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Procedure for changing this policy/Old proposal  Revision as of 00:32, 31 March 2005 edit undoGrunt (talk | contribs)8,638 edits putting a chunk of text here to replace the old proposalNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
''There was at one point a proposal here; it is now at ].''
#REDIRECT

Arbitration policy is the jurisdiction of ] and the ]; see ''e.g.'' the ], which states that the "''Arbitration Policy may be tweaked as the Committee gains experience and learns better ways of doing things''". ] has also suggested that Arbitraton Policy is not open to amendment by the community.

Several attempts have been made to instigate community interest in amendment of Arbitration policy; see ''e.g.''
* ] and its failed ]
* ] which, despite its name, was not entirely the same as the original proposed amendment
A restriction of one hundred community votes was implemented in both votes, but not met by either.

Revision as of 00:32, 31 March 2005

There was at one point a proposal here; it is now at /Old proposal.

Arbitration policy is the jurisdiction of Jimbo Wales and the Arbitration Committee; see e.g. the arbitration policy ratification vote, which states that the "Arbitration Policy may be tweaked as the Committee gains experience and learns better ways of doing things". Jimbo Wales has also suggested that Arbitraton Policy is not open to amendment by the community.

Several attempts have been made to instigate community interest in amendment of Arbitration policy; see e.g.

A restriction of one hundred community votes was implemented in both votes, but not met by either.