| Revision as of 23:40, 26 November 2007 view sourceDHowell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,674 edits →"Disputed fair use rationale": reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:16, 27 November 2007 view source Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 19 sections to User talk:BetacommandNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Thank you for the message, Mr. Bot, but you have to understand that this image ''was'' used in an article, but the article got deleted. PK 18:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC) | Thank you for the message, Mr. Bot, but you have to understand that this image ''was'' used in an article, but the article got deleted. PK 18:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| </span></blockquote> | </span></blockquote> | ||
| == Stop immediately == | |||
| You're adding user tags to article pages. ] 05:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : yeah I just realized that, there was an error in the BOTREQ, Im having that fixed now. ] 05:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == What is going on? == | |||
| The bot is tagging images that have a fair use rationale. For example ]. ] <small>]</small> 20:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, it has a fair-use rationale, but not a correct one. The fair-use rationale has to be provided for every page it is used on, but now it links to another page. Hope this helps. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 20:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I loaded this up thinking it was OK as "cover art" being an album cover, if I am wrong please remove immediately. --] (]) 20:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You have to explain on which page(s) the fair-use rationale is valid. Hope this explains. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 20:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thought you might want to know== | |||
| Your link to ] in edit summaries is going directly to the edit link instead of the page itself, thus it is showing as red in the edit summaries. ] (]) 20:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like you caught it before I commented. ] (]) 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Redirects. Again. == | |||
| Didn't you get in trouble for not recognizing redirects about 5 months or so ago? Well, your bot is ignoring backlink redirects in fair use rationale again. Due to page moves and merges and the like, this is not tenable. Please stop your bot until you fix the problem. ] (]) 20:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :, comment from 17 September 2007. Could Betacommand please clear this up quickly or I may block the bot. ] (]) 21:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| This image was '''not found in any web site.''' It was taken from an offline, burned DVD. Please do not remove the image at any costs. Thank you. ] (]) 20:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :But the fair-use rationale is not for the correct page, you might want to repair that. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 20:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Fair use rationale for Image:STB-tvchannel-logo.jpg == | |||
| What is wrong whith that image? Cannot be it used as a logo? ] <sup> ] </sup> 20:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Tnp-logo.png == | |||
| Could anyone help me to put a right fair use template to this image?... ] I don't understand a thing, and I'd really like to have this problem solved. It would be sad to have this pic removed... Help, please! ] (]) 20:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You have to tell for each use why you think that the use is 'fair use' (per ]. You can find the instructions on that page. Hope this helps. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 20:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tagging missed redirect == | |||
| The bot just tagged ] for not having the article name. However, the FUR did contain a valid redirect to the article name. Should it be checking for this case?--] 20:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:The Amityville Curse 1990 DVD Cover.JPG == | |||
| ] wrongly tagged it would seem by your bot? The DVD cover had the appropriate licensing tag and was only linked to one page? I will check for a link to the article name but was unaware that that was mandatory. What have I missed?--] <small>formerly known as User:Golden Wattle</small> <sup>]</sup> 21:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I have added the fair use rationale using the template but ALL that information had already been included in the summary with, in my view, an adequate and unambiguoius form of words. --] <small>formerly known as User:Golden Wattle</small> <sup>]</sup> 21:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Fair use image:Image:Renegades-logo.GIF== | |||
| This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright and/or trademark. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Misplaced Pages, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under United States copyright law. | |||
| Logo is of a 501c not-for-profit organization. Also no free equivalent of this image can exist. Use of this image on Misplaced Pages does not restrict its use by the copyright holder. | |||
| It illustrates the organization or a component or an aspect of the organization in question.] (]) 21:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please explain what I need to do to prove this. The photo is the property of the American Jewish Congress, where I was employed as Director of Communications. I had and have authorization to use the picture on for the Internet and Misplaced Pages. Please tell me what is needed here, I will get it for Wiki. Thank you | |||
| :] (]) 21:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image:Rena-udeba1.jpg== | |||
| You're bot says this image infringes ], but there's a clear fair use rationale for each article the image is used in, with all the information required by that criterion. Therefore, I'm removing the tag. If you still have a concern, feel free to discuss it on the image's ]. | |||
| EDIT: I realized the link to the relevant article provided in the fair use rationale was a redirect. Maybe that was the cause of the wrong tagging? ] (]) 21:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Useless bot == | |||
| Can't it follow redirects or is it just fucking stupid? —] 22:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ]. ] (]) 22:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I cannot follow the discussion. Has it been fixed or not? —] 22:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == "Disputed fair use rationale" == | |||
| Please do not use the word "disputed". People "dispute". Bots tag. There is no dispute, just an over zealous bot. —] 22:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *I have to agree with this. If this bot needs to tag images which don't have links back to the article in which is used, and no existing image tag/category is suitable, perhaps a new tag and category should be created, e.g. ]. ] (]) 23:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Image:Supertux.png == | |||
| What's wrong with the rational for this picture? It keeps rejecting it, so I went all the way and copied the use agreement from the game, and it still doesn't like it!!! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| : If this is a screenshot of GFDL software, and has no non-GFDL elements, shouldn't it use a GFDL image licensing tag? ] 22:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==What the beeswax is going on?== | |||
| The following images have been challenged: | |||
| ], ], ] and ] are all challenged under fair use. What does it take to have them qulaify since three of them are screen shots and the other is an organization's logo. FWIW ] (]) 23:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC). | |||
| == Images used in articles which are renamed/moved == | |||
| Please update your bot to recognize when an article is renamed or moved. The image ] used in ] was tagged for deletion, apparently because the article had the name ] when the rationale was added. The article was renamed and the redirect was replaced with a disambiguation page, which is why, if your bot is checking for redirects, this check would have failed. If your bot could check the edit history of the article (either the one in which it is used, or the one which is named in the use rationale) to determine if a rename occurred, and either leave the image alone or fix the article names in the image description, this would be a million times appreciated. Thank you. ] (]) 23:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Relevant ] ]]] 23:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as the one you made to ],}} did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 23:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:16, 27 November 2007
|
If you are here to register a complaint regarding this bot's edits, before doing so please note:
|
Favorite statements about ORFU images:
Thank you for the message, Mr. Bot, but you have to understand that this image was used in an article, but the article got deleted. PK 18:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)