Revision as of 05:07, 28 November 2007 editAliveFreeHappy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,573 edits →Archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:04, 28 November 2007 edit undo69.143.108.19 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{TrollWarning}} | {{TrollWarning}} | ||
{{archive box|auto=long}} | {{archive box|auto=long}} | ||
Free Republic is trying to update this article. FYI | |||
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1931395/posts | |||
== Mr. Cory == | == Mr. Cory == |
Revision as of 19:04, 28 November 2007
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (No date specified. To provide a date use: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Free Republic is trying to update this article. FYI http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1931395/posts
Mr. Cory
Dear readers:
Some idiot named Cory Bennet keeps inserting his name into this Article as a prank and I was wondering if we could revert back to the page before he decided to come mess with the article and ban him from wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.74.245.210 (talk) 15:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Archive
Since the intro is now seemingly agreed upon, I've archived the discussion. Arthurrh (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thought we were still discussing the exact wording. But, whatever. Have made two minor changes in the intro, changing two words "that --> whether" and "federal individual right" to "individual right". If this is an issue for anyone, lets discuss it. Thanks. Yaf (talk) 04:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well no one had said anything for days, and SaltyBoatr had already changed it. We can restore the discussion if it's needed. I think the changes you made were good. Arthurrh (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class law articles
- High-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Unassessed Firearms articles
- High-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles