Revision as of 22:29, 3 December 2007 view sourcePcarbonn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,444 edits let's make it shorter then. It's important to say that QM does not exclude lower ground state.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:30, 3 December 2007 view source Michaelbusch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,765 edits I don't think you made it shorter, and it isn't necessary here. But put it on talk, please.Next edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Mills first put forth his proposition of the hydrino in 1991, claiming to explain the purported excess heat reported in 1989 by ] experimentalists] (the excess heat claimed in that particular experiment was later attributed to ]]). He has continued to develop his ideas in the form of a now two-thousand page book, ''The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics'', which he distributes electronically (). Mills says he can explain various wide-ranging phenomena in chemistry, quantum mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology with hydrinos. However, he often rejects many aspects of these theories that are presently accepted and the associated experimental data. | Mills first put forth his proposition of the hydrino in 1991, claiming to explain the purported excess heat reported in 1989 by ] experimentalists] (the excess heat claimed in that particular experiment was later attributed to ]]). He has continued to develop his ideas in the form of a now two-thousand page book, ''The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics'', which he distributes electronically (). Mills says he can explain various wide-ranging phenomena in chemistry, quantum mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology with hydrinos. However, he often rejects many aspects of these theories that are presently accepted and the associated experimental data. | ||
Mills' work is not accepted by the scientific community, and has been largely ignored by it (as of November 2007, only four papers discussing hydrinos were present in the ] physics database , three of which say that hydrinos cannot exist ). The only ]ed evaluation, published in 2005 by Andreas Rathke of ], found "severe inconsistencies" in the theory, including a lack of "solutions that predict the existence of hydrinos". Rathke also noted that Mills' equations are not ], a requirement of any theory that explains the behavior of particles moving close to the ]<ref>{{cite journal |last= Rathke|year= 2005|month= May|title= A critical analysis of the hydrino model|journal= New Journal of Physics|volume= 2005|issue= 7|pages= 127|id= 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/127|url= http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/7/1/127/njp5_1_127.html|accessdate= 2007-12-03 |quote= this wave equation is not Lorentz-invariant for any other phase velocity than the speed of light}}</ref>. |
Mills' work is not accepted by the scientific community, and has been largely ignored by it (as of November 2007, only four papers discussing hydrinos were present in the ] physics database , three of which say that hydrinos cannot exist ). The only ]ed evaluation, published in 2005 by Andreas Rathke of ], found "severe inconsistencies" in the theory, including a lack of "solutions that predict the existence of hydrinos". Rathke also noted that Mills' equations are not ], a requirement of any theory that explains the behavior of particles moving close to the ]<ref>{{cite journal |last= Rathke|year= 2005|month= May|title= A critical analysis of the hydrino model|journal= New Journal of Physics|volume= 2005|issue= 7|pages= 127|id= 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/127|url= http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/7/1/127/njp5_1_127.html|accessdate= 2007-12-03 |quote= this wave equation is not Lorentz-invariant for any other phase velocity than the speed of light}}</ref> . Several scientists have issued informal evaluations of Mills' work, which are almost entirely negative. One evaluator noted that those portions of Mills' book which appeared valid were apparently ] from various physics textbooks <ref>http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN00/wn102700.html</ref>. | ||
Several scientists have issued informal evaluations of Mills' work, which are almost entirely negative. One evaluator noted that those portions of Mills' book which appeared valid were apparently ] from various physics textbooks <ref>http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN00/wn102700.html</ref>. | |||
In spite of his work's flaws, Mills' company () says it has raised millions of dollars in venture capital and has been treated relatively positively in the mainstream press. It has also given rise to a subsidiary company () which has developed and released a molecular modeling program based on Mills' models. | In spite of his work's flaws, Mills' company () says it has raised millions of dollars in venture capital and has been treated relatively positively in the mainstream press. It has also given rise to a subsidiary company () which has developed and released a molecular modeling program based on Mills' models. |
Revision as of 22:30, 3 December 2007
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Hydrino theory is a colloquial term for one aspect of a controversial set of ideas developed by Randell Mills. Mills says that this work, which he terms "Classical Quantum Mechanics", is entirely based on classical physics, rejecting well-established quantum theory. The main feature of Mills's hypothesis is the existence of new orbital states for the electron of a hydrogen atom with enhanced binding energy compared to the known hydrogen ground state. These new states have been named hydrinos. Furthermore, Mills claims that, using a catalyst, the electron in a hydrogen atom can reach an energy level below the ground state permitted by quantum mechanics, thereby releasing large amounts of energy — and turning the hydrogen into a "hydrino".
Mills first put forth his proposition of the hydrino in 1991, claiming to explain the purported excess heat reported in 1989 by cold fusion experimentalists] (the excess heat claimed in that particular experiment was later attributed to systematic errors]). He has continued to develop his ideas in the form of a now two-thousand page book, The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics, which he distributes electronically (). Mills says he can explain various wide-ranging phenomena in chemistry, quantum mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology with hydrinos. However, he often rejects many aspects of these theories that are presently accepted and the associated experimental data.
Mills' work is not accepted by the scientific community, and has been largely ignored by it (as of November 2007, only four papers discussing hydrinos were present in the arXiv physics database , three of which say that hydrinos cannot exist ). The only peer-reviewed evaluation, published in 2005 by Andreas Rathke of ESA, found "severe inconsistencies" in the theory, including a lack of "solutions that predict the existence of hydrinos". Rathke also noted that Mills' equations are not Lorenz invariant, a requirement of any theory that explains the behavior of particles moving close to the speed of light . Several scientists have issued informal evaluations of Mills' work, which are almost entirely negative. One evaluator noted that those portions of Mills' book which appeared valid were apparently plagiarized from various physics textbooks .
In spite of his work's flaws, Mills' company (BlackLight Power, Inc.) says it has raised millions of dollars in venture capital and has been treated relatively positively in the mainstream press. It has also given rise to a subsidiary company (Millsian Inc.) which has developed and released a molecular modeling program based on Mills' models.
Mills' model of the atom
Atomic Physics
Mills claims that the electron is an extended particle which in free space is a flat disk of spinning charge. The magnitude of charge is highest in the center, and falls to zero at the edge. Mills claims that the charge distribution holds itself together by achieving a force balance between the magnetic forces that act inwards, and outward centrifugal forces. The virial_theorem of classical physics says this is not possible, and observations of electrons likewise invalidate the idea of a non-spherically-symmetric charge distribution.
Mills goes on to claim that since the charge distribution is continuous, it may be treated as a surface charge, and therefore the field lines due to the charge distribution are normal to the surface. In mainstream classical physics, only a surface charge that is free to move under the influence of any tangential electric field will reach an equilibrium where only the normal component of the electric field remains..
According to Mills, when an electron is captured by a proton to form a hydrogen atom, it deforms into a spherical shell, called the 'orbitsphere'. Mills claims this sphere may act as a 'dynamic resonator cavity', able to absorb or emit discrete frequencies of radiation, giving rise to quantization and the basis for the excited states.
In Mills' model, excited states of the electron are charge density distributions of high and low charge density. These distributions exist on the surface of the orbitsphere, but reflect the spherical harmonics of quantum orbitals.
In quantum mechanics, the energy states of the hydrogen atom are solutions of the wave equation, and different energy states correspond to different electronic orbitals or distribution functions of the electron's position relative to the proton, which have been observed and are nonspherical (except for the s-orbitals).
Hydrinos
According to Mills, a specific chemical process he calls "The BlackLight Process" allows the bound electron to fall to an energy state below that of currently accepted quantum theory, at 1/integer that of the ground state radius. These below-ground hydrogen atoms are called 'hydrinos'. The mechanism consists of an energy transfer between a hydrogen atom and a catalyst that is capable of absorbing a certain amount of energy. The total energy Mills claims is released for hydrino transitions is large compared to the chemical burning of hydrogen but less than nuclear reactions. Allegedly, limitations on confinement and terrestrial conditions have prevented the achievement of hydrino states below 1/30, which would correspond to an energy release of approximately 15 KeV per hydrogen atom. No-one outside Mills' group has produced 'hydrinos', nor have they been observed to occur naturally.
Collective Phenomena, High-Energy Physics, and Cosmology
Superconductivity
According to Mills, superconductivity is due to the extended nature of the electron, and in a superconductive lattice, the electrons forms "ribbons" of charge/current. This in contradiction to validated models of superconductivity, such as BCS theory, based on the Cooper pairing of electrons.
Dark matter
According to Mills, hydrinos are the bulk of dark matter. He claims that they do not emit light, unless they are being formed or ionized. Over 90% of the visible universe consists of ordinary hydrogen, and according to this hypothesis the remaining matter in the universe (90% of the total mass of the universe) is hydrogen in stable states below that of the typical ground state. However, dark matter is also collisionless, meaning that dark matter particles do not interact by any means other than gravity or that such interactions are very rare . This contradicts the properties of hydrinos as claimed by Mills, who claims to have produced 'molecular hydrinos' and other chemical compounds containing hydrinos and normal matter.
The accelerating expansion of the universe
Starting in the 1995 version of his book, Mills claimed that the universe is accelerating as it expands]. According to Mills, the universe expands and contracts sinusoidally over billions of years, due to a posited equivalence of matter and spacetime. The universe has been found to be expanding. Mills' model, however, does not agree with other observational evidence, nor does it explain various open questions in the topic of cosmic inflation.
Alleged experimental evidence
The website of BlackLight Power Inc., founded by Mills to 'develop hydrino technology', claims to have produce these phenomena:
- Formation of plasmas in gas cells with input energies far below that required to form such plasmas.
- Spectral lines from gas cell plasmas which match the claimed predictions for hydrino transitions.
- Detection of excess heat from plasma cells using water bath calorimetry.
- New chemical compounds said to have been formed from hydrino hydrides (ie a hydrino which has captured another electron to form a negative hydride ion) which show unusual properties and structure.
- Molecular 'dihydrino' gas formation and detection.
Mills and collaborators claim only hydrino theory can adequately explain their results. Mainstream scientists have called into question the quality of these experiments, and have determined that the results can be explained by conventional physics.
Šišović et al have reported line broadening that contradicts Mills's models.
Experiments have demonstrated a radial probability distribution of the bound electron in the hydrogen atom ground state that contradicts the idea of an orbitsphere. Atomic force microscopy has imaged the electron distribution function of numerous compounds and found it to agree with quantum mechanics, in contradiction to Mills' predictions.
Controversy
2000
In a Space.com article on May 23, Douglas Osheroff, Nobel Prize winner and professor of physics at Stanford University, is quoted as saying:
may be creating compounds with unusual properties. This is obviously a rather clever guy, and he may be onto something, but he seems to think it's more fundamental than it really is.
Furthermore, Osheroff remained certain that hydrinos were a "crackpot idea".
2002
A NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I study was conducted at Rowan University, led by mechanical engineering professor Anthony Marchese, to investigate the so-called BlackLight Process for use in spacecraft propulsion. The team spent some time replicating results obtained by BlackLight, Inc., such as the observation of line broadening and excess heat (although the final report stated "Additional studies are required to rule out all other possible explanations other than 'excess power' for these observations.").
On October 27 2002, Bob Park, a professor at the University of Maryland, wrote a follow-up:
Mills has written a 1000 page tome, entitled The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics, that takes the reader all the way from hydrinos to antigravity (WN 9 May 97). Fortunately, Aaron Barth (not to be confused with Erik Baard, the Randy Mills apologist), has taken upon himself to look through it, checking for accuracy. Barth is a post doctoral researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Institute, and holds a PhD in Astronomy, 1998, from UC, Berkeley. What he found initially were mathematical blunders and unjustified assumptions. To his surprise, however, portions of the book seemed well organized. These, it now turns out, were lifted verbatim from various texts. This has been the object of a great deal of discussion from Mills's Hydrino Study Group. Mills seems not to understand what the fuss is all about.
2004-2005
Andreas Rathke of the European Space Agency published an evaluation that appeared in the New Journal of Physics. He concluded:
We found that CQM is inconsistent and has several serious deficiencies. Amongst these are the failure to reproduce the energy levels of the excited states of the hydrogen atom, and the absence of Lorentz invariance. Most importantly, we found that CQM does not predict the existence of hydrino states!
No formal rebuttal has been published by Mills or his supporters. However, through other channels, Mills pointed out that Rathke had made a sign error. (The sign error does not affect the main conclusions, as Rathke notes in a corrigendum added 23 June 2006.)
2006
Blacklight Power announced it had raised over $50M in venture capital.
In June, the subsidiary Molegos, Inc. was formed to market a molecular-modelling software application based on CQM theory. In October 2006, Molegos was renamed to Millsian. On June 14th 2007, Millsian made the beta-version of their molecular modeling software available for download.
External links
Advocacy
- Black Light Power, Inc., corporate website.
- Molegos, Inc.
- Hydrino Study Group (HSG) website
Critical
- Blacklight power from Bob Park's newsletter What's New, January 13, 2006
- Hydrino rockets, What's New, June 21, 2002
- Patent nonsense, What's New, September 6, 2002
General media
- Hydrogen result causes controversy, from Physics Web, August 5, 2005
- Will BlackLight light up the world?, Kathleen McGinn Spring, Princeton Packet, January 20, 1999
- The Alchemists Of Energy, Forbes Magazine, May 15, 2000. — offers excerpts from Robert L. Park's book Voodoo Science, ISBN 0-19-514710-3
- Academics Question The Science Behind BlackLight Power, Inc., The Harvard Crimson, May 17, 2000
- Blacklight Power gets $50M; but is it profound, or utter nonsense? SiliconBeat, January 4, 2006
References
- cited by Rathke (2005). "A critical analysis of the hydrino model". New Journal of Physics. 2005 (7): 127. 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/127. Retrieved 2007-12-03.
This model predicts the existence of new orbital states for the electron of a hydrogen atom with enhanced binding energy compared to the known hydrogen ground state. These new states have been named hydrinos.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Rathke (2005). "A critical analysis of the hydrino model". New Journal of Physics. 2005 (7): 127. 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/127. Retrieved 2007-12-03.
this wave equation is not Lorentz-invariant for any other phase velocity than the speed of light
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN00/wn102700.html
- Paul Lorrain and Dale Corson. Electromagnetic Fields and Waves. (2nd edition) Ch 4. W.H. Freeman, 1970
- e.g. McCarthy and Weingold, "Wavefunction mapping in collision experiments", Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 299 (1988)
- e.g. Moore et al. 2000. Collisional versus Collisionless Dark Matter. Astrophysical Journal, 535 L21-L24
- http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/Cosmology%20031406.pdf
- Mills, R., and P. Ray, "Extreme ultraviolet spectroscopy of helium-hydrogen plasma," J. Phys. D. 36, 17 (7 July 2003), pp. 1535-1542.
- (Eur. Phys. J. D 32:347-354, 2005, doi:10.1140/epjd/e2004-00192-1)
- McCarthy and Weingold, "Wavefunction mapping in collision experiments", Rep. Prog. Phys. 51, 299 (1988)
- http://www.stanford.edu/dept/physics/people/faculty/osheroff_douglas.html
- http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/blacklight_hydrinos_000523.html
- Marchese, A. J., Jansson, P., Schmalzel, J. L., The BlackLight Rocket Engine NIAC Phase I Final Report (May 1 – November 30, 2002).
- http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN00/wn102700.html
- Rathke, A., 'A critical analysis of the hydrino model, New J. Phys. 7 127 (2005).
- http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0505150
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/10253
- http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/01/04/blacklight_power_gets_50m_but_is_it_profound_or_utter_nonsense.html
- http://www.millsian.com/download.shtml