| Revision as of 21:56, 4 December 2007 editGtstricky (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,404 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:31, 5 December 2007 edit undoStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,973 edits →Balkans arbitration remedy: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| That was quite a big-revision time! :) — ] <sub>]</sub> 18:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | That was quite a big-revision time! :) — ] <sub>]</sub> 18:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : I hope you can follow it. I got lost. I think it is right now. ] 18:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | : I hope you can follow it. I got lost. I think it is right now. ] 18:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Balkans arbitration remedy == | |||
| In a recently-closed ], administrators were given the power to impose sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the ]. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. ] (]) 12:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:31, 5 December 2007
 |
 |
 |
 |
]
|
]
|
 |
| Userpage | Talk (message) |
Contributions | Edit Count | Logs | Sandbox |
Hello and thank you for visiting my talk page. Please know if you are here because of a vandalism report or a speedy deletion report I mean no offense. Feel free to discuss the reason for your edit or page creation on the page you were working on. If you feel you need to discuss it directly with me... well that is what this page is for.
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Pramnian and Lesbian wine
The name got you didn't it? :) No worries though. I was originally going to expand the Pramnian stub but I thought I could make a more "eye catching" DYK with an article about wine from the Island of Lesbos. Agne/ 17:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
okay
thank you i will try to remember —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.99.33 (talk) 02:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
edit conflicts, and expand
Heh... three edit conflicts with you on Mountainview High School! BTW, you shouldn't use {{expand}} on a stub article - it's only for articles which are bigger than stubs (check the template's documentation), since stub templates do pretty much the same job as part of their function. Grutness...wha? 22:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- And then another one trying to fix my accidental double posting here :) Grutness...wha? 22:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Good time ... good times...Gtstricky (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Kevin Tor
You reverted ClueBot which was trying to remove vandalism, and marked his edit as vandalism, well both the revision that you restored and the one the bot did contained vandalism ;-) I've restored a quite old one since all the revision before seems to me a mix of vandalism, unreferenced controversial information regarding a living person and unrelated comment by the revision's authors. Anyway, good luck with your vandal fighting, but please put the proper warning template on the pages of the users whose edits you revert. Snowolf 18:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to bother you again, but can you please put the warning templates on the user's whose edit you revert? Thank you and happy hunting, Snowolf 00:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Great job!
Great job reverting vandalism! Just thought I'd stop by and encourage you. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Master of Puppets 00:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
And Then There Were None
? --Oxymoron 17:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- My bad. :) Gtstricky 17:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I was just wondering. --Oxymoron 17:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Paul Scholes
That was quite a big-revision time! :) — Rudget contributions 18:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- I hope you can follow it. I got lost. I think it is right now. Gtstricky 18:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Balkans arbitration remedy
In a recently-closed arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Stifle (talk) 12:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)