Revision as of 20:40, 7 December 2007 editAlexia Death (talk | contribs)1,658 edits →RE: "I cant say I will join in on the I wait you back thing"← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:44, 7 December 2007 edit undoEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,782 edits →RE: "I cant say I will join in on the I wait you back thing": as for your (irrelevant) question : no, sadly, I was not in Durova's close confidenceNext edit → | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::::::No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | ::::::No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::::Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--] 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | :::::::Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--] 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::::::There's {{tl|blocked}}, but it's not mandatory. As for your (irrelevant) question : no, sadly, I was not in Durova's close confidence. If I was, that incident simply would not have happened, as I knew exactly who User:!! was. ] 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:44, 7 December 2007
User talk:Alexia Death/Archive1
This is Alexia Death's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Military history Baltic states task force
please take a look at this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Baltic_states_task_force --Termer 18:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom table with portfolio links
Hello! As we did for last year's election, we are again compiling a Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table. This table contains a column "Portfolio" for links that display candidates' pertinent skills. I will be going through each candidate's statements and gradually populate the column, but this may take some time. Please feel free to add some links in the form if you feel it shows conflict resolution skills, or otherwise. It would also be helpful if you can check if the information about you is correct.
My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see their actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well. I believe that conflict resolution skills are most pertinent to the position, but if you want to highlight other skills, please feel free to use a new letter and add it to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table#Columns of this table. — Sebastian 05:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- It appears you have been inactive except for one edit in the last 10 days. — Sebastian 02:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have and will be inactive due to real life situations for a little while more. I will see early December how this will translate to my candidacy for arbcom. Most likely I will withdraw it. There are more rewarding projects calling out to me and my time is limited, tho I will always be around as a watchful eye.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 05:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your openness! I know how it feels when our time is limited! If you like, we could chat about what kind of tasks you enjoy. — Sebastian 06:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
RE: "I cant say I will join in on the I wait you back thing"
Are you looking to get blocked, revert warring over adding that, obviously, harassing line? Tread lightly. El_C 17:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No I'm not, I'm just being truthful AND kind, wishing all the good things for someone away. Nothing derogatory or baiting or harassing in saying what I think. Really, I do NOT appreciate the reactions, this place is going nowhere really fast if this keeps up. Relax dude. And FYI I reverted just ONCE. Would not have done even that if the one removing my remark would have not been somebody taking offense by association to a truthful expression of good will.--Alexia Death the Grey 19:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You are taking too much liberty with innuendo and escalating disputes, so just stop right now. El_C 19:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No "little sunshine," no needing "chocolate" — limit that to your friends. You are still not trying to remain professional and matter of fact. El_C 19:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Escalating!? See my post on Jerochimans page before you got involved. "Thus is life." I said. I was done with it. And now YOU are escalating it. Really do relax man. This is ridiculous.--Alexia Death the Grey 19:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- This dispute, which you started for naught, and your interactions therefrom, has not been to your credit. Now, go do something else. El_C 19:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Since you revert warred with me, over restoring the inflammatory "you guys could do with little sunshine in your lives," you've been blocked. El_C 20:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You just cant stop cant you... I started? Thats rich, the dispute stared at some people reverting my expression of good will and others like you overreacting. BTW, I WAS doing something else before you arrived things went south thank you. And thanks for the block too. It makes very clear where you stand and what you represent, and sadly where this project is going. The Durova style at work I see. Were you part of that particular gang up list?--Alexia Death the Grey 20:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Saying to someone who recently left that you're not looking forward to them coming back is taking what you call "truthful" a bit too far. You defending it, with the "chocolate," and the "sunshine" and other types innuendo, and also the support you got from someone who views said user as "a liar and a hate monger" (unsurprisingly, you found his block for that indignant insult "uncalled for"), does not paints a pretty picture. Certainly, not one that speaks of goodwill and "true" friendliness (as in, one that utilizes one's diplomatic faculties and sensitive skills, for good). Rather, it appears as slow, gradual provocations. So, again, please limit that sort of "chat" to your friends, and with everyone else (at least your opponents), remain professional, also, when they're absent and unable to respond. El_C 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- What happened to WP:AGF? Did it die out of disregard while I was inactive? shesh...--Alexia Death the Grey 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- What do you expect me to say to that? AGF is not a suicide pact. El_C 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- PS: Where is my block notice so I can ignore it?--Alexia Death the Grey 20:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand your question. El_C 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You are supposed to put a Block notice on my talk page so I can request for unblock. You haven't.--Alexia Death the Grey 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. El_C 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--Alexia Death the Grey 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- There's {{blocked}}, but it's not mandatory. As for your (irrelevant) question : no, sadly, I was not in Durova's close confidence. If I was, that incident simply would not have happened, as I knew exactly who User:!! was. El_C 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--Alexia Death the Grey 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. El_C 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- You are supposed to put a Block notice on my talk page so I can request for unblock. You haven't.--Alexia Death the Grey 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand your question. El_C 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- What happened to WP:AGF? Did it die out of disregard while I was inactive? shesh...--Alexia Death the Grey 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Saying to someone who recently left that you're not looking forward to them coming back is taking what you call "truthful" a bit too far. You defending it, with the "chocolate," and the "sunshine" and other types innuendo, and also the support you got from someone who views said user as "a liar and a hate monger" (unsurprisingly, you found his block for that indignant insult "uncalled for"), does not paints a pretty picture. Certainly, not one that speaks of goodwill and "true" friendliness (as in, one that utilizes one's diplomatic faculties and sensitive skills, for good). Rather, it appears as slow, gradual provocations. So, again, please limit that sort of "chat" to your friends, and with everyone else (at least your opponents), remain professional, also, when they're absent and unable to respond. El_C 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)