Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:59, 10 December 2007

Adbusters

Happy to do it. I was tempted to blow it up and start from scratch, as it was (and still is, really) a pretty bad article. But I'll continue to work on it. Cheers, faithless () 10:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Frank West

I would have changed my stance on the article if the AFD hadn't been withdrawn before I had a chance to review it. Jay32183 (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Kyaa the catlord

Kyaa the catlord (talk · contribs) – is this you, or did someone else have the same idea of a username? hbdragon88 (talk) 05:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit War

Your late we ended it a long time ago, no need for the warning. Rgoodermote  01:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Besides...I only did 3 edits. this one was a minor edit I forgot to mark it. Rgoodermote  01:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

And here I am thinking he was wrong, sorry. I did miss the humor. It happens I am only human. By the way...did it really sound like I was flaming him...I thought it sounded more business like.Rgoodermote  01:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Your message

Perhaps I am the only athesist professional scientist who still believes in miracles… Hell, it takes all sorts to write an encyclopedia :P Physchim62 (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Jenin sandbox

Hi Kyaa. I noticed your comment at the sandbox. I'd like to ask you to reconsider your concern about "of one" for two reasons. First, on grammatical/editing grounds. Here's the current text: "Palestinian sources have described the events as "the Jenin massacre," and international media and human-rights organizations initially expressed concerns that a massacre had taken place. Subsequent investigations found no evidence of one, ...." I think it's clear that "one" refers to the previous singular grammatical subject, which is "massacre." In addition, the proposed revision does not address that clause, it only ends it with a period. So the "one" is no more or less clear than it is in the current version. Do you see what I mean? The proposed revision is simply keeping "one" as it already stands. Second, I've worked hard on trying to revise a couple of sentences with the folks who were commenting actively at the time on those sentences. If you could accept this version, even with the "one", I'd appreciate it. Please let me know what you think on my Talk and, if you're ok with the "one" now, please say so on the sandbox. Thanks very much for your consideration. HG | Talk 16:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

You were very responsive, thanks! Be well, HG | Talk 23:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Gracias

EndlessDan has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... {{subst:User:Krimpet/WikiJoint}}... huh?

Thanks for the backup

It's nice to know that someone around here is cool, at least. -_-* Jtrainor (talk) 07:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't necessarily agree with what you had on your userpage, but ANI isn't the right venue. You'd think administrators would know that... Then again, I think we have similar views on admins here. :P Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 07:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

To quote Lord of Light, there are dogs, there are dogs, and then there are dogs. Jtrainor (talk) 08:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow

An 'ass' and a 'trolling wikistalker'. Calling a spade a spade doesn't mean you get to make personal attacks. Personally I don't like going to go look for conflicts, but if I'm invloved in one I follow the contributions links to where the contributor is talking about it. That doesn't make me a wikistaliker, nor does that make me an ass. I don't want a grudge against you for a conflict I had with Jtrainor. — Save_Us_229 08:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)