Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tony Sidaway: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:29, 24 December 2007 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 editsm Just the facts ma'am← Previous edit Revision as of 10:50, 24 December 2007 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,267 edits In response to your accusations on Giano's pageNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


: I'd prefer to stick to ] (BRD), but if you want to restore it please do so with my blessing. (BRD is merely a consensus-making strategy, not a policy of any sort). --] 05:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC) : I'd prefer to stick to ] (BRD), but if you want to restore it please do so with my blessing. (BRD is merely a consensus-making strategy, not a policy of any sort). --] 05:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

==In response to your accusations on Giano's page==
Honestly, Tony, you're the only one who's obsessed with your ancient slight towards me—calling me a "bastard bitch from hell" in ''September 2006'', for goodness sake—get over it already! '''''I''''' don't care, '''''I''''' wasn't referring to it, the other day, when I said on IRC that you've been calling me names, and calling me "bitch"—well, you have—the word "bitch" isn't really so specific as to always constitute a hint at that weird androgynous phrase of yours, ages ago. Really, is it, now?

Yes, you have indeed repeatedly "apologized" about the phrase—really classic ] claiming it never happened, I'm making it up, '''''I'm''''' obsessed with it (!) and I haven't e-mailed you the ancient log. Sheesh... OK, the reason I haven't mailed you the log is that a ''private e-mail'' from me to you isn't going to stop you saying I lie, is it? I mean, you have the amazing effrontery to say it now; why would you suddenly stop, unless I proved, in public, that I'm telling the truth? May I ask if you even realize that it's insulting to claim a person ''lies''...? That ''that'''s an insult? There will be no e-mail dialogue with you initiated by me. I don't e-mail people who speak to me the way you do. ''But'' I'll be happy to post the relevant part of the log from September 2006 in public, on the wiki, with your permission. Say the word. Your page, or mine, or wherever. Anywhere in public.

Or, if you don't like that, here's another suggestion: the date was September 29th, 2006, the venue #wikipedia-en-admins. With that information, you, or anybody who hangs on to their ancient en-admins logs, could easily do a search to check out that I'm telling the truth. Though, admittedly, if you briskly delete this post of mine according to your usual practice, you'll make it a little harder for other people to find. ] | ] 10:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC).

Revision as of 10:50, 24 December 2007

User talk:Tony Sidaway Special:Watchlist User:Tony Sidaway/Sandbox User:Tony Sidaway/SuggestBot User:Tony Sidaway/transclusions/plot User:Tony Sidaway/Galleries User:Tony Sidaway/Licensing User:Tony Sidaway/Various Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost User:Tony_Sidaway/Civility_sanction
purge edit icons
tonysidaway@gmail.com
Deleted page contents are accessible in the page history

Just the facts ma'am

I disagree that my reference to the aphorism is culturally obscure in the English-speaking world, and state that it is a cute but succinct and helpful illustration that lead articles should be brief and relevant. I respectfully request you revert the deletion, or at least leave it open for further comment. Kransky (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd prefer to stick to Misplaced Pages:Bold, revert, discuss (BRD), but if you want to restore it please do so with my blessing. (BRD is merely a consensus-making strategy, not a policy of any sort). --Tony Sidaway 05:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

In response to your accusations on Giano's page

Honestly, Tony, you're the only one who's obsessed with your ancient slight towards me—calling me a "bastard bitch from hell" in September 2006, for goodness sake—get over it already! I don't care, I wasn't referring to it, the other day, when I said on IRC that you've been calling me names, and calling me "bitch"—well, you have—the word "bitch" isn't really so specific as to always constitute a hint at that weird androgynous phrase of yours, ages ago. Really, is it, now?

Yes, you have indeed repeatedly "apologized" about the phrase—really classic non-apology apologies claiming it never happened, I'm making it up, I'm obsessed with it (!) and I haven't e-mailed you the ancient log. Sheesh... OK, the reason I haven't mailed you the log is that a private e-mail from me to you isn't going to stop you saying I lie, is it? I mean, you have the amazing effrontery to say it now; why would you suddenly stop, unless I proved, in public, that I'm telling the truth? May I ask if you even realize that it's insulting to claim a person lies...? That that's an insult? There will be no e-mail dialogue with you initiated by me. I don't e-mail people who speak to me the way you do. But I'll be happy to post the relevant part of the log from September 2006 in public, on the wiki, with your permission. Say the word. Your page, or mine, or wherever. Anywhere in public.

Or, if you don't like that, here's another suggestion: the date was September 29th, 2006, the venue #wikipedia-en-admins. With that information, you, or anybody who hangs on to their ancient en-admins logs, could easily do a search to check out that I'm telling the truth. Though, admittedly, if you briskly delete this post of mine according to your usual practice, you'll make it a little harder for other people to find. Bishonen | talk 10:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC).