Misplaced Pages

User talk:SlimVirgin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:20, 28 December 2007 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:03, 28 December 2007 edit undoCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers171,991 edits UnblockNext edit →
Line 46: Line 46:
Thanks for your attention. -- ] (]) 03:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your attention. -- ] (]) 03:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
: You may want to read ] where this is explained. ] <small>]</small> 04:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC) : You may want to read ] where this is explained. ] <small>]</small> 04:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

==Unblock==
Can you please explain why you unblocked Zeraeph; an editor you has a long history of harassing SandyGeorgia, has posted vicious attackes on her offsite? ] (]) 18:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:03, 28 December 2007

File:Animalibrí.gif

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online

Original research

You wrote at

...

"that would be OR, because the textbooks you want to use have nothing to do with the film." -- I feel like I must be misunderstanding something here. That doesn't make much sense to me.

Statements about facts are statements about facts, and any reliable source on these facts is germane, and is not "original research" by any natural interpretation of that expression.

Whether or not the sources have something to do with the main topic of the article is irrelevant, or should be -- i.e. our policy should state this.

A policy that says that the source has to be about the main topic of the article is inappropriate.

Thanks for your attention. -- Writtenonsand (talk) 03:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

You may want to read Misplaced Pages:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material_serving_to_advance_a_position where this is explained. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Unblock

Can you please explain why you unblocked Zeraeph; an editor you has a long history of harassing SandyGeorgia, has posted vicious attackes on her offsite? Ceoil (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)