| Revision as of 02:26, 3 January 2008 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Me: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:37, 3 January 2008 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits More detailed replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Not sure why Theresa is wasting bandwidth attack me personally in a Rfa about Jim62sch, but I don't really care. She obviously is lacking in the knowledge of criminal behavior, which I am obligated by law to report. We're done here. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 02:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | Not sure why Theresa is wasting bandwidth attack me personally in a Rfa about Jim62sch, but I don't really care. She obviously is lacking in the knowledge of criminal behavior, which I am obligated by law to report. We're done here. ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 02:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Article 78 of the UCMJ states that any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that an offense punishable by this chapter has been committed, receives, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial, or punishment shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. | |||
| Article 92 of the UCMJ states that 1) any person subject to this chapter who violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation, 2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order (so branch of service is irrelevant) | |||
| 5 C.F.R. 2635.704 of US Code states that all employees of the Department of Defense have a duty to protect and conserve Government property, and to refrain from using or allowing its use for purposes other than those for which it is made available to the public or those authorized in accordance with law or regulation. | |||
| This is the specific Air Force regulation on Internet use. It's in caps, because the Air Force does it that way: | |||
| 4. INTERNET USE. GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL AND INTERNET SYSTEMS, ALONG WITH THEIR ASSOCIATED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, ARE FOR OFFICIAL AND AUTHORIZED PURPOSES ONLY. COMMANDERS MAY AUTHORIZE INCIDENTAL USE WHICH: DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES; IS OF REASONABLE DURATION AND FREQUENCY; SERVES A LEGITIMATE AIR FORCE INTEREST, SUCH AS,ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL OR MILITARY EDUCATION; AND DOES NOT OVERBURDEN THE SYSTEM OR CREATE ANY SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE AIR FORCE. A GOVERNMENT SUBSCRIPTION FOR COMMERCIAL INTERNET SERVICES OR FEE-FOR-USE SERVICES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO USING GOVERNMENT OWNED EQUIPMENT TO ACCESS THESE COMMERCIAL SERVICES. ACCESS TO AIR FORCE NETWORK TERMINAL SERVERS FROM HOME WILL BE LIMITED TO OFFICIAL USE. | |||
| This is all in response to Theresa. I hope she reads it. | |||
| Let me summarize. An employee from Microsoft adding inside information about Microsoft on Microsoft's computer network? Don't care, because it might violate Microsoft policy, but AFAIK, it does not violate United States criminal law, and certainly does not violate military law. A sergeant in the United States Air Force who knowingly utilizes the internet for personal use in direct violation of the Air Force Regulation, and as a result, I am made aware of said violation, I could be charged for an offense equally as bad as VO. As I have said, I am consciously not trying to find out who he is, despite the fact that I know that previous versions of his User page are easily accessed. 02:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:37, 3 January 2008
Me
Not sure why Theresa is wasting bandwidth attack me personally in a Rfa about Jim62sch, but I don't really care. She obviously is lacking in the knowledge of criminal behavior, which I am obligated by law to report. We're done here. OrangeMarlin 02:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Article 78 of the UCMJ states that any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that an offense punishable by this chapter has been committed, receives, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial, or punishment shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Article 92 of the UCMJ states that 1) any person subject to this chapter who violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation, 2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order (so branch of service is irrelevant)
5 C.F.R. 2635.704 of US Code states that all employees of the Department of Defense have a duty to protect and conserve Government property, and to refrain from using or allowing its use for purposes other than those for which it is made available to the public or those authorized in accordance with law or regulation.
This is the specific Air Force regulation on Internet use. It's in caps, because the Air Force does it that way:
4. INTERNET USE. GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL AND INTERNET SYSTEMS, ALONG WITH THEIR ASSOCIATED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, ARE FOR OFFICIAL AND AUTHORIZED PURPOSES ONLY. COMMANDERS MAY AUTHORIZE INCIDENTAL USE WHICH: DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES; IS OF REASONABLE DURATION AND FREQUENCY; SERVES A LEGITIMATE AIR FORCE INTEREST, SUCH AS,ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL OR MILITARY EDUCATION; AND DOES NOT OVERBURDEN THE SYSTEM OR CREATE ANY SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE AIR FORCE. A GOVERNMENT SUBSCRIPTION FOR COMMERCIAL INTERNET SERVICES OR FEE-FOR-USE SERVICES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO USING GOVERNMENT OWNED EQUIPMENT TO ACCESS THESE COMMERCIAL SERVICES. ACCESS TO AIR FORCE NETWORK TERMINAL SERVERS FROM HOME WILL BE LIMITED TO OFFICIAL USE.
This is all in response to Theresa. I hope she reads it.
Let me summarize. An employee from Microsoft adding inside information about Microsoft on Microsoft's computer network? Don't care, because it might violate Microsoft policy, but AFAIK, it does not violate United States criminal law, and certainly does not violate military law. A sergeant in the United States Air Force who knowingly utilizes the internet for personal use in direct violation of the Air Force Regulation, and as a result, I am made aware of said violation, I could be charged for an offense equally as bad as VO. As I have said, I am consciously not trying to find out who he is, despite the fact that I know that previous versions of his User page are easily accessed. 02:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)