Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:05, 10 January 2008 editUltraexactzz (talk | contribs)26,830 edits Republic of China: Page is semiprotected← Previous edit Revision as of 18:32, 10 January 2008 edit undoColoane (talk | contribs)1,107 editsm Macau FACNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 44: Line 44:
==A whole bunch of userpages== ==A whole bunch of userpages==
Whoa, dude you have a lot of user pages plus their protected. No one can vandalize your page. By the way, I like your "lest we forget" template--] (]) 02:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Whoa, dude you have a lot of user pages plus their protected. No one can vandalize your page. By the way, I like your "lest we forget" template--] (]) 02:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

==]==
Hi? Macau is now on FAC page, if you don't mind, would you please vote and give me some advices and opinions so that the article can improve more? thanks for your attention! ] (]) 18:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:32, 10 January 2008


User:Nat
userpageusertalkcontributionsMisplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Natemailblockhttp://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Nat&site=en.wikipedia.orgfr:User:Natro:User:Natm:User:Natcommons:User:Natwikinews:User:Natmemoryalpha:User:Nat.tang


 Status ACTIVE
 Residence  Toronto
 Nationality  Canada
 Ethnicity  Han Chinese
 Education  University of Toronto
 Political party None (No party affliation)
 Ontario PC Party
December 23 2024 21:24 NAET (toronto)December 24 2024 02:24 UTC (wikipedia)
Nat Archives:
one | two | three | four
five | six | seven | eight | nine
This is a Misplaced Pages user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nat.


Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please remember to sign your posts.
  1. You can do this automatically by simply typing four tildes (~), like this: ~~~~
  2. If you are using the edit toolbar option (it appears above the edit screen as a default), click the signature icon () to add the four tildes.
  • Please adhere to WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:AFG, WP:CANVASS and/or WP:EQ when placing a comment/message on this user talk page.
  • If you wish to leave a comment on this user talk page, please make sure the message is either in English or Français (or Franglais, if tu get de quoi j'ai said :P ).
  • I am an administrator/sysop
    • You may place your complaints about an editor or request a blocking of an editor on my user talk page. However, it would be preferable if you make your requests and/or complaints at WP:ANI and other Sysop-related noticeboards.
  • I am an OTRS volunteer
    • You may ask for permissions verification and inquiries for text and files (hosted on the English Misplaced Pages or Wikimedia Commons) said to have been granted permission via OTRS.
    • You may request for a review of matters that have been described as OTRS comments or actions.
    • You may inquiries that do not involve, disclose or reference private material.
Do not post
  • Private information or links to private information (including but not limited to emails, phone numbers, physical addresses).
  • Fishing requests (asking for all details of a ticket or generally probing ticket information).
  • Additional questions on a point, once I or another OTRS volunteer have indicated we cannot answer due to privacy issues.

Explanation of my signature
heissa

reda

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch

Messages Click here to leave me a message

Re: Image:101_JPG.jpg

Nat, as you requested I have entered the source and more information about the image, I hope this is the information that you required. Please let me know if you feel more information is required. Best regards, Pk-user (talk)

ROC

Nat, but by saying that ROC is a state you are also taking a side - and a marginal one. I agree that Taiwan is de facto a state, but you can not say exactly "Taiwan is a state". You should be more neutral and say, for example, that "Taiwan is de facto a state, but not recognized by other countries". That is what I call "not taking sides".

Thank you for not discussing matters of privacy. Anmiol (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk page history

Hi, Nat. Could you please restore the history of your talk page? Per WP:USER, talk pages are not to be deleted unless there is a good reason such as legal threats or a user acting on their right to vanish. Without the history of your talk page, it is quite difficult to determine whether or not an issue has been brought to your attention (such as your protection of China, which is currently on WP:RFPP for unprotection). Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 21:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

hey could i get your help

Please Review Seton Hall University Here thanks Rankun (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Re China

Just to clarify something...both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China maintains an official "One China" policy, even if the Chen Administration's "personal" views is that the Republic of China is not "China". In that sense, what I have written there is somewhat accurate, and I see it as place both states on an equal level instead of the usual one sided pressuring. nat.utoronto 19:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

However, the actual text that was written leaves a clear impression that it is China's "One-China Policy". There is no mention of a "One-China policy" that is not China's.

Due to the fact that most international, intergovernmental organizations observe the One-China policy of the People's Republic of China,...Due to the One-China policy, states around the world are pressured to recognize either the Republic of China or the People's Republic of China

Also, and I'm not arguing Chen's personal views, but consider what happened the last time a state tried to maintain diplomatic relations with both countries. (It's the last time I know of, are there any more recent examples?)

LIBERIA: China cuts relations

China severed diplomatic relations with Liberia on Tuesday over Monrovia's decision to maintain diplomatic ties with both Beijing and Taiwan. "The mistaken decision of the Liberian government has seriously damaged China's sovereignty," China's ambassador to Liberia said. A Taiwan government official, quoted by AFP in Taipei, condemned "Beijing's mentality of hegemony" over relations with Liberia. China has reportedly cancelled all bilateral agreements with Liberia. Meanwhile, Taiwan donated 90,000 dollars to Liberia on Wednesday, the day after Beijing severed relations, said AFP. Source: Reuters & AFP.

The ROC didn't protest or demand that Liberia choose one side or the other, only China did. And China was the one to cut diplomatic ties. So without considering Chen's views, we can objectively note that the ROC no longer applies pressure to make countries adhere to a One-China policy by only recognizing one of the two countries. Readin (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

ANI notification

Hello Nat, please be notified of this discussion: Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Concerns_about_administrator_Nat -- zzuuzz 01:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Republic of China

I saw some of that after I edited the notation, but didn't get a chance to read through both versions properly. My main concern was that the IP's note was both not commented out and slightly inflammatory (as it was clearly pointed directly at your edits). So I commented it out and made a brief attempt to get discussion going, as I didn't want to take a side without reading further. It looks like this isn't a new issue, though. Sorry for any confusion. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 13:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I requested and receieved Semi Protection for the RoC article, and started a section on the talk page related to the drama surrounding this edit skirmish. It seems clear that consensus is for your version, as multiple other editors reverted to it, but I wanted to make sure there was no doubt. Just FYI, UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 14:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

A whole bunch of userpages

Whoa, dude you have a lot of user pages plus their protected. No one can vandalize your page. By the way, I like your "lest we forget" template--Angel David (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Macau

Hi? Macau is now on FAC page, if you don't mind, would you please vote and give me some advices and opinions so that the article can improve more? thanks for your attention! Coloane (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)