Misplaced Pages

:Miscellany for deletion/user:Cuyler91093/various: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:36, 11 January 2008 edit12 Noon (talk | contribs)2,673 edits User:Cuyler91093: hmm...← Previous edit Revision as of 18:57, 11 January 2008 edit undoAlisonW (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,808 edits User:Cuyler91093: um ...Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
I have noted that this user has at present to their userpage. This is unacceptable behaviour and ]. I have requested that they delete at least 65 of these within the next few days, or they are likely to be deleted by someone else as they do not benefit the WP project. --] (]) 17:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC) I have noted that this user has at present to their userpage. This is unacceptable behaviour and ]. I have requested that they delete at least 65 of these within the next few days, or they are likely to be deleted by someone else as they do not benefit the WP project. --] (]) 17:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Should not the MfD wait until the "few days" have eclipsed? I '''Abstain''' until then. BTW, no offense, but without seeing any other correspondence with the user, seems a bit ], which I am sure was not intended. You could have used {{t1|uw-userpage}}. Does the user even know to mark the pages with {{t1|db-userreq}}? Unless I am missing some back-story, I just have concerns over the chosen manner. :) --''']]''' 18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Comment''' Should not the MfD wait until the "few days" have eclipsed? I '''Abstain''' until then. BTW, no offense, but without seeing any other correspondence with the user, seems a bit ], which I am sure was not intended. You could have used {{t1|uw-userpage}}. Does the user even know to mark the pages with {{t1|db-userreq}}? Unless I am missing some back-story, I just have concerns over the chosen manner. :) --''']]''' 18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
::My apologies; I was adding the note I left for the user to MfD now as a 'heads-up' rather than a request for immediate action. --] (]) 18:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:57, 11 January 2008

User:Cuyler91093

I have noted that this user has at present over 70 subpages to their userpage. This is unacceptable behaviour and contrary to the principles of Misplaced Pages. I have requested that they delete at least 65 of these within the next few days, or they are likely to be deleted by someone else as they do not benefit the WP project. --AlisonW (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment Should not the MfD wait until the "few days" have eclipsed? I Abstain until then. BTW, no offense, but without seeing any other correspondence with the user, this seems a bit bitey, which I am sure was not intended. You could have used {{uw-userpage}}. Does the user even know to mark the pages with {{db-userreq}}? Unless I am missing some back-story, I just have concerns over the chosen manner. :) --12 Noon  18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
My apologies; I was adding the note I left for the user to MfD now as a 'heads-up' rather than a request for immediate action. --AlisonW (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)