| Revision as of 20:13, 9 July 2005 editSimonP (talk | contribs)Administrators113,127 edits revert what is verging on trolling← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:19, 9 July 2005 edit undo-Ril- (talk | contribs)10,465 edits removing POV warnings is a violation of wikipedia policy. DO NOT DO IT.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{NPOV}} | |||
| {{split}} | |||
| '''Matthew 1''' is the first chapter of the ] in the ]. It contains two distinct sections. The first lists the ] of ]' legal father ] down from ]. The second part, beginning at ], relates the alleged ] of Jesus. | '''Matthew 1''' is the first chapter of the ] in the ]. It contains two distinct sections. The first lists the ] of ]' legal father ] down from ]. The second part, beginning at ], relates the alleged ] of Jesus. | ||
| ==Verses== | ==Verses== | ||
| <table border="0"><tr><td valign="top"> | |||
| | | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| </td><td valign="top"> | |||
| | | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| </td><td valign="top"> | |||
| | | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| </td><td valign="top"> | |||
| | | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| </td><td valign="top"> | |||
| | | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| </td></tr></table> | |||
| |} | |||
| ==The genealogy== | ==The genealogy== | ||
| ], father of King ]]] | ], father of King ]]] | ||
| Matthew opens with the |
Matthew opens with the genealogy of Joseph, showing that theauthor considered it to be of much importance. The genealogy served to demonstrate that Jesus belonged to the House of David. and thus his heir. The Gospel also asserts that Jesus was in fact the son of God, and Joseph was thus not actually Jesus' father. Legally, however, Joseph was Jesus' father and some scholars contend it was legal parentage that was of the most importance. | ||
| Another important issue is why the genealogy listed here is quite different from that of ]. The list from the |
Another important issue is why the genealogy listed here is quite different from that of ]. The list from the Babylonian captivity to Jesus' grandfather is wholly different. The most popular theory among apologists is that while Matthew is giving the genealogy of Joseph and his father Jacob Luke is the genealogy of Joseph's father-in-law ]. Other scholars doubt this theory and most who do not believe in the inerency of the Bible are content to believe that one or both of the pair are not historically accurate. Luke's genealogy contains a more realistic number of names given the time period and Matthew's list also lacks the ] naming used in the period. ], for one, believes that the later part of Matthew's list is "a large figure of speech". He argues that at the time it was perfectly acceptable to fill gaps in a historical narrative with plausible fiction. | ||
| Another important issue is that Matthew skips several names in portions where the genealogy is well known from other sources. ] is left out in ] and four names are dropped from ]. See the articles on those verses for the disccusion of these omissions. | Another important issue is that Matthew skips several names in portions where the genealogy is well known from other sources. ] is left out in ] and four names are dropped from ]. See the articles on those verses for the disccusion of these omissions. | ||
| Unlike most Biblical genealogies Matthew's mentions several figures not on the direct line. These include four women, ], ], ], and ]. See ] for a discussion of the various explanations for their inclusion. | Unlike most Biblical genealogies Matthew's mentions several figures not on the direct line. These include four women, ], ], ], and ]. See ] for a discussion of the various explanations for their inclusion. | ||
| See also: ] | |||
| ==Birth of Jesus== | ==Birth of Jesus== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 56: | ||
| Stendhal, by contrast, sees the second section of this chapter as a large footnote to the last line of the genealogy. An explanation at length of why Joseph is merely the husband of Jesus' mother but also of why Jesus is still a heir to David. Others feel that this section should be attached to the second chapter. That chapter is divided into four sections, each focused on an Old Testament quotation, and this portion is often seen as the first of those sections. | Stendhal, by contrast, sees the second section of this chapter as a large footnote to the last line of the genealogy. An explanation at length of why Joseph is merely the husband of Jesus' mother but also of why Jesus is still a heir to David. Others feel that this section should be attached to the second chapter. That chapter is divided into four sections, each focused on an Old Testament quotation, and this portion is often seen as the first of those sections. | ||
| == |
==External links== | ||
| . Other translations can also be accessed. | |||
| In the ] this chapters reads: | |||
| <small>]</small> The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife:<br> | |||
| <small>]</small>And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.<br> | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 20:19, 9 July 2005
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles. (discuss) |
Matthew 1 is the first chapter of the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament. It contains two distinct sections. The first lists the genealogy of Jesus' legal father Joseph down from Abraham. The second part, beginning at Matthew 1:18, relates the alleged virgin birth of Jesus.
Verses
The genealogy
Matthew opens with the genealogy of Joseph, showing that theauthor considered it to be of much importance. The genealogy served to demonstrate that Jesus belonged to the House of David. and thus his heir. The Gospel also asserts that Jesus was in fact the son of God, and Joseph was thus not actually Jesus' father. Legally, however, Joseph was Jesus' father and some scholars contend it was legal parentage that was of the most importance.
Another important issue is why the genealogy listed here is quite different from that of Luke 3. The list from the Babylonian captivity to Jesus' grandfather is wholly different. The most popular theory among apologists is that while Matthew is giving the genealogy of Joseph and his father Jacob Luke is the genealogy of Joseph's father-in-law Heli. Other scholars doubt this theory and most who do not believe in the inerency of the Bible are content to believe that one or both of the pair are not historically accurate. Luke's genealogy contains a more realistic number of names given the time period and Matthew's list also lacks the papponymic naming used in the period. Gundry, for one, believes that the later part of Matthew's list is "a large figure of speech". He argues that at the time it was perfectly acceptable to fill gaps in a historical narrative with plausible fiction.
Another important issue is that Matthew skips several names in portions where the genealogy is well known from other sources. Jehoiakim is left out in Matthew 1:11 and four names are dropped from Matthew 1:8. See the articles on those verses for the disccusion of these omissions.
Unlike most Biblical genealogies Matthew's mentions several figures not on the direct line. These include four women, Tamar, Ruth, Bathsheba, and Rahab. See Matthew 1:3 for a discussion of the various explanations for their inclusion.
See also: Genealogy of Jesus
Birth of Jesus
The second part of this chapter relates some of the events around the birth of Jesus. While Luke and Matthew disagree on some of the details the most important ideas such as the Virgin Birth and the divine nature of Jesus are shared. Unlike Luke's account Matthew focuses on the character of Joseph. It features Joseph's discovery and concern over his betrothed's pregnancy and the message from an angel telling Joseph to stand by Mary and then quoting Isaiah 7:14 presaging the birth of the messiah.
That this section focuses on Joseph is unusual. Schweizer feels that Matthew is far more concerned with proving Jesus' legal status as the step-son of Joseph, and thus a legal heir of David than he is with proving the Virgin Birth. Schweizer feels this is evidence for Matthew's intended audience having mainly Jewish backgrounds, a pattern that continues throughout the Gospel. The importance placed on the reference to the Old Testament is further evidence of this. Hill feels that the quote from Isaiah was, in fact, the central element of this section and believes the entire last part of the chapter was written to prove that Jesus' story matches the prophecy.
Stendhal, by contrast, sees the second section of this chapter as a large footnote to the last line of the genealogy. An explanation at length of why Joseph is merely the husband of Jesus' mother but also of why Jesus is still a heir to David. Others feel that this section should be attached to the second chapter. That chapter is divided into four sections, each focused on an Old Testament quotation, and this portion is often seen as the first of those sections.
External links
The King James Version of Matthew 1 on BibleGateway. Other translations can also be accessed.
References
- Albright, W.F. and C.S. Mann. "Matthew." The Anchor Bible Series. New York: Doubleday & Company, 1971.
- Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. London: G. Chapman, 1977.
- France, R.T. The Gospel According to Matthew: an Introduction and Commentary. Leicester: Inter-Varsity, 1985.
- Gundry, Robert H. Matthew a Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1982.
- Hill, David. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981
- Jones, Alexander. The Gospel According to St. Matthew. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1965.
- Schweizer, Eduard. The Good News According to Matthew. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1975
| Chapters of the New Testament | ||
| Preceded by: First chapter |
Gospel of Matthew | Followed by: Matthew 2 |