Revision as of 10:43, 18 January 2008 editGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:22, 18 January 2008 edit undoKosebamse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers5,826 edits completing the quatation, if you permitNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | he High Command pressed for an early trial and conviction. By the time it realized it had no conclusive evidence against Dreyfus, it was politically impossible to withdraw the prosecution without a scandal bringing down the highest levels of the French Army. Thus the accusations against Dreyfus, void of any merit .. became a massive cover-up to justify the hasty decision to press charges against him. The subsequent ] was notable for numerous errors of ]. For example, the defense was unaware of a secret ] that the prosecution had provided to the military judges. Withholding this dossier from the defense was illegal by French law. | ||
⚫ | By the time it realized it had no conclusive evidence against Dreyfus, it was politically impossible to withdraw the prosecution without a scandal bringing down the highest levels of the French Army. Thus the accusations against Dreyfus, void of any merit .. became a massive cover-up to justify the hasty decision to press charges against him. The subsequent ] was notable for numerous errors of ]. For example, the defense was unaware of a secret ] that the prosecution had provided to the military judges. Withholding this dossier from the defense was illegal by French law. | ||
I thought you would appreciate the above grandiose but eloquent irony. Returnez vous, s'il vous plait chere Bishonen, je t'aime et nous missons vous. ] (]) 10:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC) | I thought you would appreciate the above grandiose but eloquent irony. Returnez vous, s'il vous plait chere Bishonen, je t'aime et nous missons vous. ] (]) 10:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:22, 18 January 2008
From the Dreyfus affair
he High Command pressed for an early trial and conviction. By the time it realized it had no conclusive evidence against Dreyfus, it was politically impossible to withdraw the prosecution without a scandal bringing down the highest levels of the French Army. Thus the accusations against Dreyfus, void of any merit .. became a massive cover-up to justify the hasty decision to press charges against him. The subsequent court-martial was notable for numerous errors of procedure. For example, the defense was unaware of a secret dossier that the prosecution had provided to the military judges. Withholding this dossier from the defense was illegal by French law.
I thought you would appreciate the above grandiose but eloquent irony. Returnez vous, s'il vous plait chere Bishonen, je t'aime et nous missons vous. Giano (talk) 10:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)