Misplaced Pages

:Administrators open to recall/Admin criteria: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators open to recall Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:38, 17 January 2008 editSteve Smith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,250 edits →Criteria list: adding myself← Previous edit Revision as of 19:13, 19 January 2008 edit undoRevolving Bugbear (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,923 edits add self, using User:Lar/AccountabilityNext edit →
Line 148: Line 148:
|] |]
|Completely ripped from ]. Simple and sweet, no complications. |Completely ripped from ]. Simple and sweet, no complications.
|-
|]
|]
|I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use ]'s.
|- |-
|] |]

Revision as of 19:13, 19 January 2008

This page is part of the overall voluntary and unofficial admin recall process and supporting material. It is a list of criteria developed by various admins who are members of Category:Misplaced Pages administrators open to recall, as well as others interested in adminship who are not yet admins. Only the admin themselves should add their information to this table, as the recall process itself is voluntary, and so is making criteria or process information known in advance (although some would strongly encourage it).

Criteria list

Admin /
Admin Hopeful 		Criteria Process Descriptions Notes
A. B. criteria process For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User talk:Lar/Accountability
Alex Bakharev criteria process from August 2006
Alison criteria process Inspired by Fvasconcellos and Lar. May simplify, but it'll do for the moment.
anetode I will relinquish the admin bit by request of five editors in good standing or one administrator who has earned my respect. Lar's recall disclaimers apply.
AnonEMouse criteria process Shame that something so simple has to be converted into "party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part...", but so it goes.
Archtransit criteria process
Audacity criteria process Firsfron's standards look good
BanyanTree criteria process Requires another admin subject to recall for a kick-off, while keeping the rest pretty simple. A tradeoff between broad accountability and avoiding unnecessary drama and process.
Carcharoth criteria process I wish it could be simpler, but the 28 December 2007 page versions I've linked to in Lar's page detail the criteria and process for anyone wishing to ask me to stand for recall. Please check the current version for any major changes - these will not apply unless I update the links here.
David Fuchs criteria process A straight-forward, three-prong description of my method.
Dreadstar criteria process Inspired by EVula's fine work.
EVula criteria process Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.
Firsfron criteria process Keep It Simple, Stupid.
Friday some thoughts Start an RFC-like discussion. If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.
Fvasconcellos criteria process Not as simple as I'd like. May revise soon.
Herbythyme criteria process I agree with the process & criteria created by Lar. I'd prefer something simpler but I'll anchor my process and criteria for now.
Husond criteria process Will relinquish administrator status with 6 editors in good standing's requests in a period no longer than 4 months.
Hut 8.5 criteria process Includes elements from a few other peoples' recall criteria.
John criteria process Revised long-standing accountability policy (which was initially based on Lar's since August 2006) in light of recent thinking. I will link to Lar's process; I don't believe it is a good use of our time for every admin to think up their own and Lar's is very good
James086 criteria process My recall page is pretty short but it does the job I think.
kbthompson criteria process Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.
Keilana Criteria Process My policies for recall are very liberal; I subscribe to the "easy come, easy go" philosophy.
Kirill Lokshin criteria process Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.
KrakatoaKatie criteria process Unabashedly stolen from EVula while I think about it some more, but I don't think I'll change it much.
Lar criteria process Extensively revised in mid December 2007 to include detailed process descriptions, has talk page for comments and feedback.
Merovingian criteria process I'm trying to keep this really simple.
User:Nightstallion criteria process I'll be using the very well developed criteria and process written up by Lar, as well. (The version linked to applies.)
Pigman criteria process Completely ripped from Firsfron. Simple and sweet, no complications.
criteria process I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.
Riana criteria process Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)
Royalguard11 criteria process To the point I think.
Sarcasticidealist criteria process The process and criteria will be listed by the end of January 18, Mountain Standard Time
Sean William criteria process Short, simple, to the point.
SebastianHelm process and notes Avoiding bureaucratic overhead so we all can focus on creating a good encyclopedia.
Shell Kinney criteria process Pretty basic stuff, I think
Singularity criteria process Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.
SirFozzie criteria process Will relinquish administrator status with five editors in good standing's request.
Spike Wilbury criteria process Simple criteria and process.
Tbo 157 criteria process Will resign or start an RfC. Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.
Tim Vickers criteria process According to the criteria at User talk:Lar/Accountability
utcursch criteria and process I'll step down upon a request from 5 users in good standing.
Walton One criteria and process My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.
Warofdreams criteria process Using Lar's comprehensive criteria and process, for now at least.
Woody criteria process Follow Lar's processes of RfC or resignation.
xDanielx criteria and process Fairly typical; involves RFCU
Y criteria and process Will take to ArbCom or relinquish administrator status outright upon request of five administrators in good standing.
Yannismarou criteria and process Based on Firsfron and Y

See also

Note: the above is not an exhaustive list.

Requests for comment

Note: the above is not an exhaustive list

Note: this page was copy/paste moved from Category:Misplaced Pages administrators open to recall/Admin criteria (because you cannot move a category page to a non category page). For the early edit history of this page, or for any GFDL related concerns, you should refer to that page's edit history. Admins should consider revalidating their listing by a null edit to this page. If that is done by all admins present when this was copy/pasted, that page can be deleted but for now it will remain a soft redirect.