Misplaced Pages

User talk:ChazBeckett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:35, 29 January 2008 editEquazcion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,926 editsm rm comments← Previous edit Revision as of 11:09, 29 January 2008 edit undoEquazcion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,926 edits rm commentsNext edit →
Line 121: Line 121:


See my edit summary -- again: the exchange has nothing to do with improving the article and should be removed. see ]. Now tell me what ''you'' "don't get" about that. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">] ]/] ''10:34, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small> See my edit summary -- again: the exchange has nothing to do with improving the article and should be removed. see ]. Now tell me what ''you'' "don't get" about that. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">] ]/] ''10:34, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small>

:Since you don't seem to care about this on my talk page, perhaps you'd be more inclined to respond on yours. It takes a pretty low person to hide behind 3RR without being able to actually defend his stance. So, once again, please tell me how this exchange has anything to do with 99WP:SPOILER]]:

----
::YellowTapedR prefers to throw insults around instead. --''']''' (]) 00:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
:::Said the ''completely'' non-polarizing editor known as Farix. {sigh} Your constant accusations remind me of an old Usenet staple: "you telling me I'm off-topic is off-topic." You are free to figure out how that is relevant on your own. I trust that you are both intelligent and mature enough to catch my meaning. ] (]) 02:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of personal attacks...--] (]) 02:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

And the dust covering the blood from the dead horse is beaten yet again....] <sup>]</sup> 02:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

You're very clever. I don't really see the use in ridiculing anyone who posts here who you don't agree with, automatically pulling the dead horse card. --] (]) 02:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
:I think you're misinterpreting my statement. Even the editor starting this thread recognized that the horse has been laid to rest. If you're not going to contest deletion, perhaps it ''is'' time to declare the matter dead (at least for the near future). Just a suggestion.] <sup>]</sup> 02:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
::I got the same meaning off your statement as YellowTapedR did ] (]) 02:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
----

I eagerly await your response, if you do indeed have any idea what you're talking about. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">] ]/] ''11:09, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small>

Revision as of 11:09, 29 January 2008

Talk Page Rules
  1. To start a new message, click the click the + mark by the "edit this page" tab. Enter your subject, message, and sign your name (see rule five if you don't know how to sign your name).
  2. If I begin a topic on your talk page, I will respond on your talk page.
  3. If you begin a topic on my talk page, I will respond on my talk page.
  4. As always, please adhere to WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA.
  5. ALWAYS sign with ~~~~ four tildes, or your message will be deleted.


Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Recent book and Recent film

Now that {{recent book}} and {{recent film}} have been deleted, would you mind telling me what they had to do with {{current fiction}}? --Pixelface (talk) 00:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I've said all I'm going to say on this subject. Sorry if you don't consider it to be sufficient. Chaz 00:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Hirohito#RFC:_Appropriate_Emperor_Name

An RFC on content you have commented on has opened, comments are welcome. MBisanz 01:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Email

Hi Chaz, just to let me know, I've sent you an email. Ryan Postlethwaite 02:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 3 14 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature 
Special: 2007 in Review Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named 
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page 
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect" News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones 
Misplaced Pages in the News Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 4 21 January 2008 About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part II New parser preprocessor to be introduced 
Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" 
News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones Misplaced Pages in the News 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

rm comments

See my edit summary -- again: the exchange has nothing to do with improving the article and should be removed. see wp:talk#Others' comments. Now tell me what you "don't get" about that. Equazcion /C 10:34, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC)

Since you don't seem to care about this on my talk page, perhaps you'd be more inclined to respond on yours. It takes a pretty low person to hide behind 3RR without being able to actually defend his stance. So, once again, please tell me how this exchange has anything to do with 99WP:SPOILER]]:

YellowTapedR prefers to throw insults around instead. --Farix (Talk) 00:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Said the completely non-polarizing editor known as Farix. {sigh} Your constant accusations remind me of an old Usenet staple: "you telling me I'm off-topic is off-topic." You are free to figure out how that is relevant on your own. I trust that you are both intelligent and mature enough to catch my meaning. Postmodern Beatnik (talk) 02:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of personal attacks...--YellowTapedR (talk) 02:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

And the dust covering the blood from the dead horse is beaten yet again....Chaz 02:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

You're very clever. I don't really see the use in ridiculing anyone who posts here who you don't agree with, automatically pulling the dead horse card. --YellowTapedR (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I think you're misinterpreting my statement. Even the editor starting this thread recognized that the horse has been laid to rest. If you're not going to contest deletion, perhaps it is time to declare the matter dead (at least for the near future). Just a suggestion.Chaz 02:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I got the same meaning off your statement as YellowTapedR did Garda40 (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I eagerly await your response, if you do indeed have any idea what you're talking about. Equazcion /C 11:09, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC)