Misplaced Pages

:Requests for arbitration/Ehud Lesar/Workshop: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration | Ehud Lesar Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:24, 31 January 2008 editPocopocopocopoco (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,882 edits Template: rename case← Previous edit Revision as of 05:42, 31 January 2008 edit undoGrandmaster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,518 edits Move to review the checkuser request behavior of Grandmaster and AtabekNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


:'''Comment by parties:''' :'''Comment by parties:'''
:: Oppose. This appears to be just an attempt by this user to prevent cu on himself. Pocopocopocopoco was protesting implementation of a cu, which revealed 4 sock accounts, and stopped only when the steward told him to: , and he is believed by some to be a reincarnation of a banned user: I have a reason to assume that this request has certain personal motives. ] (]) 05:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
::


:'''Comment by others:''' :'''Comment by others:'''

Revision as of 05:42, 31 January 2008

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.

Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators may edit, for voting.

Motions and requests by the parties

Move to allow for the review of other WP:DUCK indef. blocks

1) Request the review, in this arbcom case, of other Armenia-Azerbaijan topic editors that were indefinitely bocked using the WP:DUCK test.

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:
Proposed. As per my statement. I believe these editors were indefinitely banned with far less evidence than Ehud Lesar. I may also post additional information in the evidence section. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 02:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Move to review the checkuser request behavior of Grandmaster and Atabek

2) Request a review of user:Grandmaster and user:Atabek's WP:RFCU behavior.

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Oppose. This appears to be just an attempt by this user to prevent cu on himself. Pocopocopocopoco was protesting implementation of a cu, which revealed 4 sock accounts, and stopped only when the steward told him to: , and he is believed by some to be a reincarnation of a banned user: I have a reason to assume that this request has certain personal motives. Grandmaster (talk) 05:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment by others:
Proposed. As per my statement. I may also post additional info in the evidence section. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Move to rename Case

3) Request that this case be renamed to Armenia-Azerbaijan-Ducktests

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:
Proposed. As per my statement. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 02:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2)

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

3)

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

4)

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Questions to the parties

Proposed final decision

Proposals by User:X

Proposed Principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:


Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:


Proposals by User:Y

Proposed Principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:


Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:


Proposals by User:Z

Proposed Principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:


Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:
Comment by parties:
Comment by others: