Misplaced Pages

Hi

Hi, please help me to delete the Template:Distillers page, because already exists one template asigned for the same band, and is the follow Template:The Distillers, i don't want to comite vandalism, on the contrary, i try to delete a useless template, Thnx Maul day (talk) 05:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk page revert

I apologize, dear, but I have reverted an attack on your talk page because he refactored some comments and gave you an attack. Normally I would have the same rules, but that didn't go very well. Cheers, —BoL 00:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem, thanks dear. Keilana| 01:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. —BoL 01:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

How was that vandalism?

He is a convicted child pornographer. You might object on editorial grounds, but it is factually accurate and substantiated within the article itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.84.9 (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Mandingo

What's the deal with Mandingo? You undid my edits as vandalism, then reverted back to them without comment... Reyemile (talk) 03:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Academy Awards for Best Actress

Ziyi Zhang definitely wasn't nominated for Best Actress in 2006 (for the year 2005). She was nominated for a globe and a SAG for her performance in Memoirs of a Geisha, but not an Academy Award. By undoing my edit, you're also saying that SIX actresses were nominated in that category for that year. Uh... no. It's been 5 for the past 70 years (give or take). Edhed (talk) 06:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Ender's Game.

Me? Edit science fiction articles? Wow, that's new. :P I think you meant to say you read the part on my userpage where I say I'm a sci-fi geek. ;) Sure, I'll help you copyedit the article, and as soon as I read the book, expand it as well. · AndonicO 12:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Help about sockpuppets

There is a guy User:Rws killer, and he has so far produced numerous reincarnations after being blocked for making a teacher attack article: User:Rws killer2, User:Umm killer, User:nku pyrodragon, and his latest, User:Rws killer6. He has been evading blocks all the time, and I think it should be the time to stop him now. Can you hardblock his IP address? STYROFOAM☭1994 15:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

My reply to Dinesh

Hi Keilana, I just saw your note posted to my talk page about my note to Dinesh. I was answering the question he asked me , which was posted directly above your note to me. I worked extensively with Dinesh recently on Western Chalukya literature, and he knows who I am. If you have in fact removed my message to him, I would appreciate it if you would restore it. Nothing sinister is happening here. Finetooth (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. No harm done. Don't give it another thought. My best. Finetooth (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

• :-) (oops, silly Wiki-coding) Scarian 17:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Favor?

Hi Keilana, could you do me a favor and create my userpage please? Something simple like "A" will be fine. Thanks. 74.133.9.95 (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Now it's got a bit of flavor. :D GlassCobra 17:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. :P Keilana| 17:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Much thanks to you both. :) 74.133.9.95 (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I'd suggest that you make an account, here's why. :) Keilana| 17:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, do you think I was wrong to undo this edit? It does seem like a occasion that could happen, but I wasn't too sure. I reverted just and in case and decided to seek a second opinion. Thanks in advance. 74.133.9.95 (talk) 00:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Indeed you are correct, I have reverted myself and noted that I should be more careful in my edit summary. Many thanks for the speedy reply! 74.133.9.95 (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

huugle

I just thought I would tell you that my started working again with 0.6.1 when I copied the configuration here to my configuration page Alexfusco 19:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

I disagree, I believe it is constructive Wonderpet (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Wonderpet (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

It is not a randon acronym, I did not make it up and it is very well known, even having been used in an episode of the simpsons by proffessor Frink. it is very old, as old as me perhaps. I am 45(thats old!!!) Wonderpet (talk) 21:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=nerd&string=exact Wonderpet (talk) 21:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Funny, I found it through a google search, try googling "acronym finder" Wonderpet (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

That thing's wicked fast. ++Lar: t/c 21:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

and dangerous. ++Lar: t/c 04:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Shane Diesel mix up

Sorry about accidentally reverting your edit as vandalism, I ment to revert the vandal's edit, not yours... Whoops CrazyRob926 (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey YOU!

stop beating me to reverts! :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Compwhizii (talk • contribs) 23:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Good...:) Compwhiz II_(Contribs) 23:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Now, who can tell me why the smiley is a frown? · AndonicO 02:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I am glad to see you came by the Singh article as another Admin also has and others too recently. I am going to take a break since I have had enough personal insults and racial slurs thrown at me that it has left a really bad taste in my mouth. Please make sure the article is not hijacked and taken over for a poltical agenda.

I was really upset and erased all of my contributions to the article but admin Utcursch reverted them back and told me he will also keep an eye on things as well, Utcursch has cleaed up the article and has really done a great job with all the work I put into gathering the information, I really am grateful for his/her effort. I appreciate Admins getting involved because others people like myself can do very little except to add legitimate information, try to put together a neutral academic piece, but their is only so much abuse one can take from religious fanatics with political agendas.

Again Thank you for stopping by and I hope you continue to keep an eye on things.

Gorkhali (talk) 02:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Good luck. Keilana| 02:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyvio spammer alert

Stoprev (talk · contribs) —BoL 02:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll take a look. Keilana| 02:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Request for protected edit

I have requested an edit to a page that you full-protected, Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey. While I am not opposed to improving the article in question, I would argue that the warning templates at issue should remain until such time as the article has been improved. Thank you for your consideration. Groupthink (talk) 03:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Additionally, please tag Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey as protected, which you forgot to do when you protected it. Thanks. Groupthink (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Muy Gracias

Thank you very much for catching the vandalism on Mr. Faris' profile. Very much appreciated. Have a good day. PS How do I alter my ID name? Thank you again :) Mc2006 (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Darragh

1) Darragh IS of Scottish origin, not Irish origin (http://www.surnamedb.com/surname.aspx?name=Darragh) 2) Mark Darragh DOES exist. Fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.139.100 (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I just discovered that you're the person who finally deleted the longstanding mess/POV magnet that was the adult-child sex article. I just had to say thank you - I wouldn't have wanted to close that AfD myself, but someone had to do it, and as far as I can see you made entirely the right decision. It seems you did face some criticism for it, but I just hope that won't put you off making similar tough, controversial, but correct decisions in future.

Anyway, I don't normally like these things, but I think you deserve this:

Recent deprods I made to reprods you made (does that make sense?)

Hello, just wanted to let you know, I'd originally deprodded a number of articles that the vandal Lumberjake had removed the prod tag on before, because technically anyone can remove a prod to contest it. But as it became clear that his deprods were simply vandalism, and he was now blocked for doing it, I undid all those deprods (those articles all do deserve a prod). Just wanted to clear up any confusion in your talk page history. -- Atama 00:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Admin coach request

I saw your name on the list and thought you might be a good coach. Interested? — BQZip01 —  07:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. — BQZip01 —  21:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

User talk:78.86.13.53

Just wondering why you warned this IP for vandalism (and reverted their edit) following their deleting a PROD tag with an explanatory edit summary ("LSEGP is a highly influential political grouping within national student politics") as is encouraged by WP:PROD.

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _{talk contrib} 20:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Request

Yes i do have the proof. it's in these links: Google Project Chanology and click the second link because the website is blacklisted on Misplaced Pages. --Party! (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Page protection

Keilana, can you please explain why you have semi protected the page Huma Abedin ? You have stated vandalism which is clearly not the case! Please see Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard where the matter is being dealt with ! Can you explain your actions ? I understand I am new here but it was one of the first pieces of information i have cont. to wikipedia there has been no decision made, I can not understand your actions !

Having now had the rules for vandalism explained to me I believe you have abused your power as my contib. clearly dosent fit any of the terms ? I ask you to reaccess your actions.

The decision was made at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_page_protection#Huma_Abedin_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29. Its common practice during an edit dispute such as this for an uninvolved admin such as Keilana to semi-protect the page to reduce the intensity of the dispute. In any case, from the tone of Misplaced Pages:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Gossip_magazines_as_reliable_sources it seems that semi-protection was the right call to stablize the article while discussion continued there and on the talk page of the reliability of sources. MBisanz 05:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I would question how uninolved you actally are give these messges left on my talk page: And don't worry! You'll be able to edit that page in 5 days! Enjoy! —BoL 04:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

And by waiting for five days is by just waiting and you'll be able to edit the semi-d pages. Don't worry, give Keilana some time! She's offline right now, and so am I. —BoL 05:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:100%25freehuman"

I intend on asking someone to examine your actions. You clearly statd vandalism as your reason for the protection i would not you made no contibution to the talk page and sort no concensus from you action! I will also ask you to explain you relastionship to those who have sort to remove the information ? I would also like to know why you have changed you id ? thanks I will be adding this information to the talk page and any were else i find help ! I also note you did not add the fact the matter was being listed to protection page to the talk page of the article ?

I did not create the name of the page in regards to gossip mag tittle had you read the info you would understand Hillary Clinton was interviewed for the article.

To request unprotection, please go here Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_page_protection#Current_requests_for_unprotection. To ask for Keilana to be examined(?) I'd wait for her to respond here, and if your not satisfied, there is the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. I leave the personal inquiries for Keilana to answer is she desires to. MBisanz 06:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Responded on the editor's talk, thanks MB. Keilana| 06:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I would like to know how the article was brought to your attention I would also advise you that i have posted this information on the talk page of the article.

Thank you Dear MBisanz, thank you so much for responding to those concerns on my talk page. I've posted on the person's talk, if s/he wants my admin actions looked at s/he can always seek input at AN or (God forbid) through recall. You've been a great help recently, and when you're ready for RfA I'd really like to nominate you, if you've got some space for me. :) Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 06:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:MBisanz"

and your atual post:

Hello, Sorry I couldn't attend to your concerns earlier. I semi-protected the page (here) because of the reasons stated there. As it is election season in the United States, articles about prominent political figures such as Mrs. Clinton are particularly vulnerable, hence the protection. There was a dispute over the reliability of sources, and I protected the article to cool the dispute. Protection isn't an endorsement of the current version, I have no ulterior motive. (see here for protection policy/information). In general, an admin doesn't need consensus to protect a page when a dispute is ongoing. Is there a problem with my administrative actions? Thanks for expressing your concerns, feel free to ask on my talk page if you have other questions or need something. Best, Keilana|Parlez ici 06:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:100%25freehuman"

The information was added to keep record for a complaint add so people reading the page understand why it is copy protected!

Who bought the information to the protect board ? Should not the fact it was brought to the board have been added to the talk page so people could provide information as to why it shouldnt be protected ? I was again note you claimed your reason for protecting the page was vandelism which it clearly is not! How do I request a recall ? Thanks : ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 100%freehuman (talk • contribs) 06:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I would draw to your attention:

IP blocked for 3RR. Eventually. I had to go on IRC and whine a bit first. Relata refero (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Did you talk to this person on IRC ? Secondly you continue to fail to address the fact that there was no Vandalism as defined and the terms of Vandalism. How can you protect a page for a reason that is not true ?

Once again !!!!

You continue to fail to address the fact that there was no Vandalism as defined and the terms of Vandalism. How can you protect a page for a reason that is not true ?

this will be the last time i ask ! I have grown tired : ( Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Keilana" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 100%freehuman (talk • contribs) 07:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

While you're trying to sort this mess out, you may want to factor in that the IP 121.220.6.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was blocked for 24 hours and now 100%freehuman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is making the same point about 19 hours later. Pairadox (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)