| Revision as of 22:40, 1 February 2008 editZenwhat (talk | contribs)Rollbackers4,094 edits →Please stop removing comments.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:47, 1 February 2008 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,877 edits →Please stop removing comments.: editors are allowed to remove comments - as it happens this is a duplicate of the conversation on his user talk pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| ==Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator== | ==Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator== | ||
| My ] was successful, and closed with '''44''' Supports, '''6''' Opposes, and '''1''' Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both ] and ''''']]]''''' for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 01:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | My ] was successful, and closed with '''44''' Supports, '''6''' Opposes, and '''1''' Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both ] and ''''']]]''''' for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 01:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Please stop removing comments. == | |||
| Addhoc, I restored Danieleng's last posting to your talkpage. It is not clear why you would remove his remarks, since he appears to be a respected editor, expressing concerns to you in good-faith. You again removed his remarks. This seems highly inappropriate. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 22:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:47, 1 February 2008
 Archives | |||
|
|||
Nancy Reagan
I have attempted to create a MedCab request for the nancy reagan article but have been unable to create the MedCab request.
Please view my user discussion page as well as the Nancy Reagan discussion page for details.
I eagerly await your assistance. Thank you so much. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 06:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've created the page here.--Addhoc (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. If I understand correct, I now edit that page with the information requested and you review it, yes?
Thanks so much. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, if you could edit the page with the information requested, I'll review it. Addhoc (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Will do tonight, thanks again! 207.237.228.83 (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, no chance this evening. I received on my talk page and replied .
Will complete the form tomorrow evening for your and Doug's action. Thanks again. 207.237.228.83 (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, no chance this evening. I received on my talk page and replied .
- Will do tonight, thanks again! 207.237.228.83 (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
Nomoredonkeys, Head Commissioner of Misplaced Pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.56.60.66 (talk) 21:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe he will release a virus or malicious bot onto this site without notice. STYROFOAM☭1994 03:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Reported!--DurzaTwink (talk) 03:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Dispute - how to work to resolution
I appear to be in an edit war with another editor, and would like to resolve the issue. However, I'm having difficulty doing this because despite leaving messages on the article page Fox in Socks and on the user's talk page 75.40.33.116 (talk · contribs), they do not reply or nor do they attempt to discuss the issue. The only response is a revert and/or re-edit of the page, plus wiki-comments to the effect: "Please do not delete or move this text." The fact that the user is an anonymous IP also make s life difficult as it appear that they can sometimes change IP address. Any suggestions about the best way forward within the Misplaced Pages guidelines/policies would be gratefully received. The edit in question is not particularly controversial, but I don't like to give in to what feels to me like bullying tactics.. Thanks. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Portal
I have created a portal called Portal:Animal and I am lacking of experience to edit it. Could somebody help me to improve it?--Mark Chung (talk) 14:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Roseline
Hi, the term "Roseline" was invented by Dan Brown for his novel The Da Vinci Code and there is no earlier citation of this name in existence, unless you can find one. The ray of light that is linked to the gnomon in the church of St Sulpice in Paris has nothing to do with a "Meridian". Wfgh66 (talk) 22:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The ray of light in St Sulpice Church, Paris
http://en.wikipedia.org/%C3%89glise_Saint-Sulpice%2C_Paris
You can read here that the ray of light associated with the gnomon at the church of St Sulpice has nothing to do with the Paris Meridian, but with determining the time of the equinoxes and hence of Easter - quote: "At noon on the winter solstice (December 21), the ray of light touches the brass line on the obelisk. At noon on the equinoxes (March 21 and September 21), the ray touches an oval plate of copper in the floor near the altar." This is an accurate description.Wfgh66 (talk) 22:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Paris Meridians and Roseline
http://en.wikipedia.org/Roseline
This needs a little more work on it because two Paris Meridians are involved - the old and the new - I believe that it's the old Paris Meridian that passes 200 meters away from the Louis Lawrence tomb at Les Pontils ("Arques") Wfgh66 (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
I am not one for sending round pretty pictures, but after my recent RfA, which passed 68/1/7, I am now relaxed and this is to thank you for your support. I will take on board all the comments made and look forward to wielding the mop with alacrity. Or two lacrities. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator
My RfA was successful, and closed with 44 Supports, 6 Opposes, and 1 Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both Rudget and bibliomaniac15 for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 01:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)