| Revision as of 12:48, 30 January 2008 editBentheadvocate (talk | contribs)580 edits →Messages← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:36, 2 February 2008 edit undoDrEightyEight (talk | contribs)286 edits →One of your edits at Corporate branding has been mentioned at WP:COINNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Hello Bentheadvocate. Please join the discussion at ]. One of the problems is: how can we verify that any factual claims referenced to an unpublished book are actually in the book? (A statement from the previous edition might no longer be there). ] (]) 06:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | Hello Bentheadvocate. Please join the discussion at ]. One of the problems is: how can we verify that any factual claims referenced to an unpublished book are actually in the book? (A statement from the previous edition might no longer be there). ] (]) 06:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Homeopathy article probation notification == | |||
| You should be aware that Homeopathy and related articles are under probation - Editors making disruptive edits to these pages may be banned by an administrator from ] and related articles or project pages. Editors of such articles should be ''especially'' mindful of content policies, such as ], and interaction policies, such as ], ], ], and ]. Editors must be individually notified of article probation before being banned. All resulting blocks and bans shall be logged at ], and may be appealed to the ]. You are being informed of this due to your edit here: --] (]) 10:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:36, 2 February 2008
This Is Benjamin Hartaub
IF YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS ABSOLUTELY HAS TO INTRUDE UPON MINE, LEAVE ME A MESSAGE:
Message Archives
Messages
BETA 12:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Quebec
Except the revision I'm putting it at has a consensus among editors, unlike yours. The person changing from consensus has to prove their point. The onus is on you, not us. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 22:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
One of your edits at Corporate branding has been mentioned at WP:COIN
Hello Bentheadvocate. Please join the discussion at WP:COIN#User:Majken schultz. One of the problems is: how can we verify that any factual claims referenced to an unpublished book are actually in the book? (A statement from the previous edition might no longer be there). EdJohnston (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Homeopathy article probation notification
You should be aware that Homeopathy and related articles are under probation - Editors making disruptive edits to these pages may be banned by an administrator from homeopathy and related articles or project pages. Editors of such articles should be especially mindful of content policies, such as WP:NPOV, and interaction policies, such as WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, WP:3RR, and WP:POINT. Editors must be individually notified of article probation before being banned. All resulting blocks and bans shall be logged at Talk:Homeopathy/Article probation#Log of blocks and bans, and may be appealed to the Administrators' noticeboard. You are being informed of this due to your edit here: --DrEightyEight (talk) 10:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)