Revision as of 04:11, 29 January 2008 editAnthon01 (talk | contribs)4,204 edits →A tip← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:45, 3 February 2008 edit undoJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →Note: notification of Talk:Homeopathy/Article probationNext edit → | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
==Note== | ==Note== | ||
I think you may have cut into a comment made by Arion 3x3 in this section. I moved you comment down a little please check to made sure it ok. Thanks. ] (]) 04:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | I think you may have cut into a comment made by Arion 3x3 in this section. I moved you comment down a little please check to made sure it ok. Thanks. ] (]) 04:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Homeopathy article probation== | |||
Please read ]. Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:45, 3 February 2008
January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Homeopathy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf 20:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Talk:Homeopathy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. The Helpful One 20:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC))
- What are you talkig about ? Justidy, please. I request an administrator to comment on the above please. Should I file a complain?
--Area69 (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- What do you want an administrator to comment on, exactly? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, adding "Hello?" (unsigned) to the talk page is not helpful. I don't think I'd call it vandalism, exactly. Then again, I'd never seen {{uw-huggle1}} or {{uw-huggle2}} before. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, What do you mean by a personal attack? I am using a new software called Huggle to revert edits, how exactly am I not helpful, nothing in this history shows that? The Helpful One 20:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Are you serious ? Was my edit inconstructive or it was vandalism?
- You suppose to discuss before you revert. --Area69 (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's clearly not constructive, but I wouldn't call it vandalism. (BTW, you're signature is somewhat questionable, pointing to #top, but that's another problem.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Why it is not constructive? It is sourced ( from a major newpaper ) and shows what homeopaths believe.--Area69 (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's clearly not constructive, but I wouldn't call it vandalism. (BTW, you're signature is somewhat questionable, pointing to #top, but that's another problem.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, that isn't helpful, but the edit appeared to be vandalism, I mean adding Hello? to a page appears to be vandalism! -- The Helpful One 20:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I added "hello" becouse my edit ( well sourced and helpful edit ) was reverted without discussion. Calling someone a vandal is constructive? Does this info exists in the article? --Area69 (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) The point you made on your talk page - that the information you added to the article should be included - was appropriate and constructive. Adding "hello?" after that served no purpose, and was reverted. Does that make sense? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- To explain still more fully: User:Thehelpfulone's warnings to you weren't based on the material you added to the article; they were based only on your repeated addition of "hello?" to the article's talk page. That's the part that was unconstructive. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I didnt mind the hello revert.( Isnot too much to call it ...vandalism though ) I did mind my edit being reverted without discussion. Thanks for your responce and your time though. --Area69 (talk) 21:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
Could someone help to add the Vythoulkas reference properly in Homeopathy? I think the way I had done it was OK but not completely sure. --Area69 (talk) 08:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please look here This tool creates citations, which you only have to copy in the article.--Thw1309 (talk) 12:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!
|
≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Sm565 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete OrangeMarlin 17:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Try to be friendly and constructive. You have ability. Your opinions even -if I disagree with sometimes- are useful in the debate. They force other editors -including me - to research and find better solutions to editorial problems.Best. --Area69 (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
A tip
I have noticed over at the Homeopathy talk page that you are starting to contribute on the talk page. If I may, I would like to give you some advice about how to put your comments in so readability is maintained and so others can reply. Please see below. It may also help to click on "edit this page" and see how these are constructed.
Comment #1 (0 colons)
- Reply to comment #1 (1 colons)
- Reply to reply (2 colons)
- Reply to reply (3 colons)
- Reply to Reply (4 colons)
- Reply to Reply (5 colons)
- Reply to Reply (4 colons)
- Reply to reply (3 colons)
- Reply to reply (2 colons)
(undent)Reply to Reply (you usually spell out undent so other editors know that you are still replying to the same original comment. If you are starting a new comment, no colons and don't use undent)
- Reply to Reply (1 colons)
And so forth. Not everyone will undent after 5 colons as it depends greatly on the length of the posts after 5-6 colons.
I hope this helps. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or any of the other editors. Thanks. Baegis (talk) 08:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Note
I think you may have cut into a comment made by Arion 3x3 in this section. I moved you comment down a little please check to made sure it ok. Thanks. Anthon01 (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Homeopathy article probation
Please read Talk:Homeopathy/Article probation. Thank you. Jehochman 02:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)