| Revision as of 02:50, 3 February 2008 editDurzatwink (talk | contribs)478 edits Deleting 3/4 of the defense is not a smart thing to do← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:51, 3 February 2008 edit undoStyrofoam1994 (talk | contribs)5,333 edits for the final time, what durzatwink wrote is NOT defenseNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| :No I am not and you already made a sockpuppetry case against me but it was dissmissed. Please stop doing this. Thanks--]] 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | :No I am not and you already made a sockpuppetry case against me but it was dissmissed. Please stop doing this. Thanks--]] 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Also, there is another case that is being done between Styrofoam1994, Sanjay517 and me . May I also add that this user is trying to bring me down after I collected a sufficient amount of evidence for sockpuppetry against the user's friend ]. However, due to my good faith, I did not add the sockpuppet master and sockpuppet in the ]. Sincerely--]] 02:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::This user was my adoptee. However, for some odd reasaon he is now accusing me of sockpuppetry. Styrofoam1994 also vandalized my user page and he tricked people by claiming that he was a wikipedia administrator. All evidence can be seen , which is also the exact place that I asked for the administrator who gave him rollback rights to double check Styrofoam's contribs. I did not say that i wanted his rollback rights to be removed. I clearly stated for his profile to be double checked. In the end, he maintained his rollback rights due to the fact that it is not an ability that can bring mass destruction to wikipedia and I continued on my life warning vandals, reporting abusers and reverting pages. Best regards--]] 02:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 3 February 2008
User:Durzatwink
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Durzatwink (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rws killer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Rws killer2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Umm killer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Nku pyrodragon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Rws killer6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 02:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
His edits are all in the same area of interest, are somewhat biased in favor of what he is writing about, and all of their styles of talking are very similar, as in here, here, here, here, here, and here. I also know that all of the previous persons mentioned have been blocked and linked to User:Rws killer, as in here and here. They have all been created a few days right after the previous identity was blocked indefinitely.
- Comments
Even though he has reformed a bit recently, he was intent on bringing me down before, and still is attempting to do that, as in here and other posts.
- No I am not and you already made a sockpuppetry case against me but it was dissmissed. Please stop doing this. Thanks--DurzaTwink 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions