| Revision as of 22:51, 4 February 2008 editMastCell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators43,155 edits nomination | Revision as of 23:03, 4 February 2008 edit undoBadagnani (talk | contribs)136,593 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :{{la|Victor A. Marcial-Vega}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Victor A. Marcial-Vega}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Practitioner of alternative medicine who fails ] and ]. A few unreliable Websites are cited, but there is no coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. A self-published (?) book and set of DVD's for sale does not establish notability either. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | Practitioner of alternative medicine who fails ] and ]. A few unreliable Websites are cited, but there is no coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. A self-published (?) book and set of DVD's for sale does not establish notability either. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Notable individual; sources presented and cited. Editors should not be in the business of attempting to remove articles about individuals with whose ideas or world views they disagree, as even physicians with questionable medical ideas, if notable, are worthy of coverage in our encyclopedia. Editor proposing deletion is known for this highly flawed, POV-motivated mode of editing, which we should eschew in favor of building the best, most complete encylopedia possible (even including articles on notable individuals with whom we, as editors, disagree). ] (]) 23:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 4 February 2008
Victor A. Marcial-Vega
- Victor A. Marcial-Vega (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Practitioner of alternative medicine who fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. A few unreliable Websites are cited, but there is no coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. A self-published (?) book and set of DVD's for sale does not establish notability either. MastCell 22:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable individual; sources presented and cited. Editors should not be in the business of attempting to remove articles about individuals with whose ideas or world views they disagree, as even physicians with questionable medical ideas, if notable, are worthy of coverage in our encyclopedia. Editor proposing deletion is known for this highly flawed, POV-motivated mode of editing, which we should eschew in favor of building the best, most complete encylopedia possible (even including articles on notable individuals with whom we, as editors, disagree). Badagnani (talk) 23:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)