| Revision as of 19:13, 17 February 2008 editRickyrab (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,334 edits →February 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:53, 21 February 2008 edit undoMoreschi (talk | contribs)19,434 edits →Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo: reNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| :I'm not sure, but I think you just violated ] with respect to ]. What are you trying to do, get blocked? <nowiki></nowiki> — ] | ] 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | :I'm not sure, but I think you just violated ] with respect to ]. What are you trying to do, get blocked? <nowiki></nowiki> — ] | ] 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Actually, you are probably allowed another revert, but check on that. The problem is: it'll likely be reverted, so you're probably checkmated as is. <nowiki></nowiki> — ] | ] 19:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ::Actually, you are probably allowed another revert, but check on that. The problem is: it'll likely be reverted, so you're probably checkmated as is. <nowiki></nowiki> — ] | ] 19:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Per this arbitration case you are hereby ] from ] and all closely related pages for one week. This ban will be enforced by rollbacks and blocks if necessary. No point letting you and continue with disruptive editing, is there? ] <sup> ]</sup> 19:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, I see you didn't quite understand this. Please read and for explanation. ] <sup> ]</sup> 14:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:53, 21 February 2008
...
.svg)
For no particular reason
Hope you have a good day! Nengscoz416 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Serbia
Hey, I was wondering if you would be interested in adding a few entries to keep this portal updated... (It will automatically change articles every month.) Thanks, --Bolonium (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Albanians in Serbia
Hi, I noticed your edits to this and its related articles. I certainly understand the reasoning for combining them into the one article. But this article was created by copy and pasting, and was done without seeking consensus. I also understand that we can't keep all three of the articles - we need either the two seperate ones or the combined article. But if we're going to put them together, we at least need to do a proper merger, and not simply a blank-and-redirect. I don't want to turn this into an edit war so I'm not going to undo your edits, but I'd appreciate it if you would. Thanks! Dchall1 (talk) 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kosovo. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. <3 bunny 19:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but I think you just violated 3RR with respect to Kosovo. What are you trying to do, get blocked? — Rickyrab | Talk 19:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, you are probably allowed another revert, but check on that. The problem is: it'll likely be reverted, so you're probably checkmated as is. — Rickyrab | Talk 19:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo
Per this arbitration case you are hereby banned from Kosovo and all closely related pages for one week. This ban will be enforced by rollbacks and blocks if necessary. No point letting you game the system and continue with disruptive editing, is there? Moreschi 19:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I see you didn't quite understand this. Please read this and this for explanation. Moreschi 14:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)