| Revision as of 16:46, 21 February 2008 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers216,676 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:49, 21 February 2008 edit undoLawrence Cohen (talk | contribs)13,393 edits →Full revert: please watch itNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :Mikka I am still working to finish this article and in my draft is just about to add refrences. What kind of admin uses foul language and reverts edits? What has happened to you? --] 16:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | :Mikka I am still working to finish this article and in my draft is just about to add refrences. What kind of admin uses foul language and reverts edits? What has happened to you? --] 16:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::OK. Restored for now. I expect references ASAP. I strongly suggest you to refresh your knowledge of]. You are not a newcomer who must be politely warned three times and then blocked to stop him from violating wikipedia policies. Citing sources is an absolutely fundamental policies. Please change your writing style so that you put in references simultaneously with text. P.S. Did I act as an admin? Do you think only admins must not use foul language? Do you think calling someone's actions as "vandalism" without seeing and responding to an edit summary is nice and polite? `']] 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | ::OK. Restored for now. I expect references ASAP. I strongly suggest you to refresh your knowledge of]. You are not a newcomer who must be politely warned three times and then blocked to stop him from violating wikipedia policies. Citing sources is an absolutely fundamental policies. Please change your writing style so that you put in references simultaneously with text. P.S. Did I act as an admin? Do you think only admins must not use foul language? Do you think calling someone's actions as "vandalism" without seeing and responding to an edit summary is nice and polite? `']] 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::This language and tone is completely unacceptable, Mikkalai. Tone it done and ]. <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">] § ]/]</font></span> 16:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:49, 21 February 2008
Title
Would Danubian Host be a better name? --Irpen 23:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, the Danubian Cossack Host refers to a Russian Cossack army that existed there in the mid 19th century. --Kuban Cossack 15:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Full revert
Mikka explain yourself for this . --Kuban Cossack 16:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Explained in edit summary: Kuban kazak, what is the source of your long addition? YOu are not newcomewr to write such long essays WITHOUT A SINGLE REFERENCE ! `'Míkka>t 16:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Mikka I am still working to finish this article and in my draft is just about to add refrences. What kind of admin uses foul language and reverts edits? What has happened to you? --Kuban Cossack 16:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Restored for now. I expect references ASAP. I strongly suggest you to refresh your knowledge ofwikipedia:Attribution. You are not a newcomer who must be politely warned three times and then blocked to stop him from violating wikipedia policies. Citing sources is an absolutely fundamental policies. Please change your writing style so that you put in references simultaneously with text. P.S. Did I act as an admin? Do you think only admins must not use foul language? Do you think calling someone's actions as "vandalism" without seeing and responding to an edit summary is nice and polite? `'Míkka>t 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- This language and tone is completely unacceptable, Mikkalai. Tone it done and WP:AGF. Lawrence § t/e 16:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Restored for now. I expect references ASAP. I strongly suggest you to refresh your knowledge ofwikipedia:Attribution. You are not a newcomer who must be politely warned three times and then blocked to stop him from violating wikipedia policies. Citing sources is an absolutely fundamental policies. Please change your writing style so that you put in references simultaneously with text. P.S. Did I act as an admin? Do you think only admins must not use foul language? Do you think calling someone's actions as "vandalism" without seeing and responding to an edit summary is nice and polite? `'Míkka>t 16:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)