| Revision as of 12:55, 23 July 2005 editMaustrauser (talk | contribs)4,154 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:56, 23 July 2005 edit undoFamekeeper (talk | contribs)778 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Delete and Redirect''' to ]--] 05:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete and Redirect''' to ]--] 05:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. It is incomprehensible --] 12:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. It is incomprehensible --] 12:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Allow''' , pace fair use of History and relevance to WP articles , such as the ] 'Dubious' (discussion) in which I exhibit the most simple error stemming from lack of historical understanding . Let me finish this job ....so you will be enabled to change your minds . The edit war concerns what I term censorship, please do not further strike against your own History or at least allow the full story and facts to emerge , finally, upon the WP . I really do assure you of my good faith and that this is no idle vandalism but the entire reverse . I would ask in fact that everyone help by going to the sources which I am not able to visit -such as the contemporary writer , like ] , and several others . You will understand that this page is a true portrait of history , in the single title it contains, and that future WP articles will not diminuish , but magnify these connections of utility . That the utility is deeply suspect and particularly relates to ] and the ] threat , makes the events portrayed by historians here, extremely contemporary and revealing of our present world -balance . '''I appeal to your good faiths''' by urging you to read it when it is finished . I am quite aware that this is not the normal form for an encyclopedic article , but suggest , in good faith , that a simple short interpretation would be considered POV by certain injured feelings and that in other words , there would be a complete failure of the WP to represent the world ''as it is'' . When there is sufficient wisdom that editors can agree as to the true nature of the facts and story, a simplified version could then be put forth . These sections could rest as the background proofs, such as are always required ,could they not? Please visit the expansion here and be patient . Even now please, each good faith editor-'''reverse your initial conclusions''' and suspend your judgements the while .] 15:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Let me delete entire- saving it to the discussion on a new empty ''Pope's Hitler'' article which I shall write in an encyclopedic entry, twenty lines max- howzat ? Isn't that fair ?] 15:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:56, 23 July 2005
Pope's Hitler
This appears to be fall-out from some edit war somewhere. Uncle G 04:24, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per Uncle G. Hamster Sandwich 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not an encyclopedia article. — Ливай | Ⓣ 04:36, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and Redirect to Hitler's Pope--Porturology 05:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It is incomprehensible --Maustrauser 12:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Allow , pace fair use of History and relevance to WP articles , such as the Holocaust 'Dubious' (discussion) in which I exhibit the most simple error stemming from lack of historical understanding . Let me finish this job ....so you will be enabled to change your minds . The edit war concerns what I term censorship, please do not further strike against your own History or at least allow the full story and facts to emerge , finally, upon the WP . I really do assure you of my good faith and that this is no idle vandalism but the entire reverse . I would ask in fact that everyone help by going to the sources which I am not able to visit -such as the contemporary writer , like Writer John Cornwell , and several others . You will understand that this page is a true portrait of history , in the single title it contains, and that future WP articles will not diminuish , but magnify these connections of utility . That the utility is deeply suspect and particularly relates to anti-semitism and the Communist threat , makes the events portrayed by historians here, extremely contemporary and revealing of our present world -balance . I appeal to your good faiths by urging you to read it when it is finished . I am quite aware that this is not the normal form for an encyclopedic article , but suggest , in good faith , that a simple short interpretation would be considered POV by certain injured feelings and that in other words , there would be a complete failure of the WP to represent the world as it is . When there is sufficient wisdom that editors can agree as to the true nature of the facts and story, a simplified version could then be put forth . These sections could rest as the background proofs, such as are always required ,could they not? Please visit the expansion here and be patient . Even now please, each good faith editor-reverse your initial conclusions and suspend your judgements the while .Famekeeper 15:31, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Let me delete entire- saving it to the discussion on a new empty Pope's Hitler article which I shall write in an encyclopedic entry, twenty lines max- howzat ? Isn't that fair ?Famekeeper 15:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)