Misplaced Pages

National Endowment for Democracy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:48, 9 July 2005 editEveryking (talk | contribs)155,603 editsm →Founding of the NED← Previous edit Revision as of 16:00, 23 July 2005 edit undoBee Hive (talk | contribs)47 edits rvNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''National Endowment for Democracy''', or '''NED''', is non-profit organization which claims to help train people in democracy and manages money grants to that effect, which was founded in ]. Although administered by a private organization, its funding comes mostly from a governmental appropriation by the ]. The NED is sometimes referred to as "Project Democracy," an appellation favored by Lt. Colonel ]. The '''National Endowment for Democracy''', or '''NED''', is non-profit organization which claims to help train people in democracy and manages money grants to that effect, which was founded in ]. Although administered by a private organization, its funding comes mostly from a governmental appropriation by the ]. The NED is sometimes referred to as "Project Democracy," an appellation favored by Lt. Colonel ].

Its alleged links with ] regimes in ] during the ] lead some critics to claim that rather than supporting ], it in fact opposes ].


==Founding of the NED == ==Founding of the NED ==


The NED was first funded by ] ] in ] and shaped by an initial study undertaken by the American Political Foundation. The NED was first funded by President ] in 1982 and shaped by an initial study undertaken by the ].


NED was created with a view to creating a broad base of political support for the organization. NED received funds from the US government and distributes funds to four other organizations – one each created by the ] and ] parties, one created by the business community and one by the labor movement. NED was created with a view to creating a broad base of political support for the organisation. NED received funds from the US government and distributes funds to four other organisations – one each created by the Republican and Democrat parties, one created by the business community and one by the labour movement.


The four affiliated organizations are Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), the ] (NDI), the ] (IRI) and the Free Trade Union Institute (parent organization for ]). The four affiliated organisations are ] (CIPE), the ] (NDI), the ] (IRI) and the ] (parent organization for ]).


==Funding of foreign political parties== ==Funding of foreign political parties==


The NED regularly provides funding to opposition candidates in elections in countries other than the USA. The NED regularly provides funding to opposition candidates in elections in countries other than the USA.

⚫ According to left-wing critics, the NED only supports candidates with strong ties to the military and who support the rights of US corporations to invest in those countries. They claim that the NED does not support candidates who oppose investments by US corporations or who promise restrictions on investment rights of US corporations. For example, Bill Berkowitz of ] claims that ''The NED functions as a full-service infrastructure building clearinghouse. It provides money, technical support, supplies, training programs, media know-how, public relations assistance and state-of-the-art equipment to select political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, and other media. Its aim is to destabilize progressive movements, particularly those with a socialist or democratic socialist bent.''

Other critics maintain that the NED equates "democracy" with ], ], and the economic theories of ].

⚫ John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton wrote that before the 1990 elections in Nicaragua “President Bush sent $9 million in NED, including a $4 million contribution to the campaign of opposition presidential candidate Violeta Chamorro”. Chamorro won.


⚫ In the 1990 elections in ], the NED supported Marc Bazin providing a big fraction of his total US-supported campaign funds of $36 million. Despite this funding, he only obtained 12% of the vote. Marc Bazin had earlier been a ] official. He was seen by most Haitians as a "front man for military and business interests", and had been prime minister during military rule, for the presidential election.
⚫ According to ] critics, the NED only supports candidates with strong ties to the military and who support the rights of U.S. corporations to invest in those countries. They claim that the NED does not support candidates who oppose investments by US corporations or who promise restrictions on investment rights of US corporations. For example, Bill Berkowitz of ''Working for Change'' claims that, ''"The NED functions as a full-service infrastructure building clearinghouse. It provides money, technical support, supplies, training programs, media know-how, public relations assistance and state-of-the-art equipment to select political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, and other media. Its aim is to destabilize progressive movements, particularly those with a socialist or democratic socialist bent."''


During 2001/2002, the NED gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to US and Venezuelan groups who organised protests and a coup d'etat against the elected president of Venezuela, ]. The coup happened on ] ]. According to Wayne Madsen, a former intelligence officer with the US navy, US military attaches such as Lieutenant Colonel James Rogers had been in touch with members of the Venezuelan military to examine the possibility of a coup, while Roger Rondon claimed that both James Rogers and another US military officer, Ronald MacCammon, had been at the Fuerte Tiuna military headquarters with the coup leaders during the night of ]-12.
⚫ John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton wrote that before the ] elections in ], ''"President ] sent $9 million in NED, including a $4 million contribution to the campaign of opposition presidential candidate ]"''. Chamorro's party won 55 percent of the vote.


⚫ NED also funded political groups in the democracies of ] in the ]. The French newspaper '']'' published a report which claimed that the U.S. funded the ]. The United States government disassociated itself from these actions.


⚫ NED also funded political groups in the ] of ] in the ]. Its funding of ] such as the ] ] (associated with violent groups), was revealed by the French newspaper ]. The United States government disassociated itself from these actions.
⚫ In the ] elections in ], the NED supported Marc Bazin providing a big fraction of his total $36 million in campaign funds. Despite this funding, he only obtained 12% of the vote. Marc Bazin had earlier been a ] official.


During the ], NED invested millions of dollars in ] to support its vision of ] and the ] program. During the 1990s, NED invested some money, at least about $9,000,000 , in Eastern Europe to support its vision of ] and the ] program, leading to unemployment rates of about 20-40% in Eastern European countries.


In ], ] president ] publicized documents which purported to show that the NED funded opposition groups in the country, including a tripling of funding from about $250,000 to nearly $900,000 between ] and ] in the lead up to an attempted coup in ]. NED also sponsored ]s for the ] in which the percentage of voters supporting Chávez was significantly less than in the official election results. In ], documents were publicized which revealed the NED had given over ]1 million to anti-Chávez opposition groups in ]. ], one such opposition group that had organized a recall referendum against him in ] of ], received just over $50,000. Chávez has repeatedly questioned U.S. involvement in a short-lived coup on him on ], ] when the president was briefly overthrown. The documents show the NED tripled its funding from about $250,000 to nearly $900,000 between ] and ] in the lead up to the attempted ouster. NED also sponsored controversial ]s for the ] in which the percentage of voteres supporting Chávez was significantly less than in the official election results.


===Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Slovakia=== ===Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Slovakia===


The NED played a controversial role in the ] ] elections in the ]. In an article in the '']'', NED director Nadia Diuk acknowledged the controversy: ''"Some have sought to portray the events in Ukraine as orchestrated in the West, a model executed with the support of Western pro-democracy foundations."'' Comparing this to similar recent interventions in ], ] and ], she writes, ''"Some commentators believe that the similarity of their actions proves they are part of a U.S.-sponsored plot, an effort to extend American influence throughout the world."'' Diuk states that critics are overlooking a genuinely ''"home-grown"'' aspect to the ''"election revolts"'' in these Eastern European countries. She also stated that, ''"...there was a massive effort by ] to monitor the vote, whether through parallel vote tabulations, exit polls or reports from domestic observers. These strategies were supported by the reports of Western election observers,"'' and that ''"all these breakthrough elections have been accomplished with the vigorous participation of civic groups that support free and fair elections by monitoring the media, carrying out voter education, publicizing the platforms of candidates in the absence of a free press, training election observers, conducting polls and so on."'' The NED played a controversial role in the November, ] elections in the ]. In an article in the '']'', NED director Nadia Diuk acknowledges the controversy: "Some have sought to portray the events in Ukraine as orchestrated in the West, a model executed with the support of Western pro-democracy foundations." Comparing this to similar recent interventions in ], ] and ], she writes, "Some commentators believe that the similarity of their actions proves they are part of a U.S.-sponsored plot, an effort to extend American influence throughout the world." Choosing her words carefully, Diuk does not dismiss these charges outright, but strongly implies that critics are overlooking a genuinely "home-grown" aspect to the "election revolts" in these Eastern European countries. She acknowledges as well that "...there was a massive effort by ] to monitor the vote, whether through parallel vote tabulations, exit polls or reports from domestic observers. These strategies were supported by the reports of Western election observers," and that "all these breakthrough elections have been accomplished with the vigorous participation of civic groups that support free and fair elections by monitoring the media, carrying out voter education, publicizing the platforms of candidates in the absence of a free press, training election observers, conducting polls and so on."


==Source of Funding == ==Source of Funding ==


The NED receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. budget and is subject to congressional oversight even as a non-governmental organization. In the financial year to the end of ] ] NED had a budget of $48.5 million. The NED receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. budget and while a non-governmental organisation is subject to congressional oversight. In the financial year to the end of September 2002 NED had a budget of US$48.5 million.


The NED also receives funding from various foundations. The ] has provided the most to date, nearly $1.5 million in the past 18 years to support the ''''. The NED also receives funding from various foundations. The ] has provided the most to date, nearly US$1.5 million in the past 18 years to support the ''''.


==Links with other ]s== ==Links with other ]s==


Directors of the Board includes Frank Charles Carlucci III of The ], General ], of venture capital company the Stephens Group, ] of the ] for Public Policy Research, Dr. ], ], and ] current chairman of the ]. Directors of the Board includes ] of The ], General ], of venture capital company the ], ] of the ] for Public Policy Research, Dr. ], ], and ] current chairman of the ].


== See also == == See also ==
*]
⚫ * ]
* ] *]
*]
* ]
*]
⚫ * ]
*]
⚫ * ]
⚫ *]
⚫ *]
*]
⚫ *]


==External links== ==External links==
Line 50: Line 61:
* , Media Transparency * , Media Transparency
* , a critical report from the ] * , a critical report from the ]
* *
* *
* *
* - Article by NED director Nadia Diuk * ''Article by NED director Nadia Diuk''


] ] ] ]

Revision as of 16:00, 23 July 2005

The National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, is non-profit organization which claims to help train people in democracy and manages money grants to that effect, which was founded in 1983. Although administered by a private organization, its funding comes mostly from a governmental appropriation by the United States Congress. The NED is sometimes referred to as "Project Democracy," an appellation favored by Lt. Colonel Oliver North.

Its alleged links with authoritarian regimes in Latin America during the 1980s lead some critics to claim that rather than supporting democracy, it in fact opposes democracy.

Founding of the NED

The NED was first funded by President Ronald Reagan in 1982 and shaped by an initial study undertaken by the American Political Foundation.

NED was created with a view to creating a broad base of political support for the organisation. NED received funds from the US government and distributes funds to four other organisations – one each created by the Republican and Democrat parties, one created by the business community and one by the labour movement.

The four affiliated organisations are Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI), the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the Free Trade Union Institute (parent organization for AIFLD).

Funding of foreign political parties

The NED regularly provides funding to opposition candidates in elections in countries other than the USA.

According to left-wing critics, the NED only supports candidates with strong ties to the military and who support the rights of US corporations to invest in those countries. They claim that the NED does not support candidates who oppose investments by US corporations or who promise restrictions on investment rights of US corporations. For example, Bill Berkowitz of Working for Change claims that The NED functions as a full-service infrastructure building clearinghouse. It provides money, technical support, supplies, training programs, media know-how, public relations assistance and state-of-the-art equipment to select political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, and other media. Its aim is to destabilize progressive movements, particularly those with a socialist or democratic socialist bent.

Other critics maintain that the NED equates "democracy" with free trade, globalization, and the economic theories of Adam Smith.

John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton wrote that before the 1990 elections in Nicaragua “President Bush sent $9 million in NED, including a $4 million contribution to the campaign of opposition presidential candidate Violeta Chamorro”. Chamorro won.

In the 1990 elections in Haiti, the NED supported Marc Bazin providing a big fraction of his total US-supported campaign funds of $36 million. Despite this funding, he only obtained 12% of the vote. Marc Bazin had earlier been a World Bank official. He was seen by most Haitians as a "front man for military and business interests", and had been prime minister during military rule, for the presidential election.

During 2001/2002, the NED gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to US and Venezuelan groups who organised protests and a coup d'etat against the elected president of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez. The coup happened on 11 April 2002. According to Wayne Madsen, a former intelligence officer with the US navy, US military attaches such as Lieutenant Colonel James Rogers had been in touch with members of the Venezuelan military to examine the possibility of a coup, while Roger Rondon claimed that both James Rogers and another US military officer, Ronald MacCammon, had been at the Fuerte Tiuna military headquarters with the coup leaders during the night of 11 April-12.


NED also funded political groups in the democracies of Western Europe in the 1980s. Its funding of French political groups such as the right-wing National Inter-University Union (associated with violent groups), was revealed by the French newspaper Libération. The United States government disassociated itself from these actions.

During the 1990s, NED invested some money, at least about $9,000,000 , in Eastern Europe to support its vision of economics and the shock therapy program, leading to unemployment rates of about 20-40% in Eastern European countries.

In 2004, documents were publicized which revealed the NED had given over US$1 million to anti-Chávez opposition groups in Venezuela. Súmate, one such opposition group that had organized a recall referendum against him in August of 2003, received just over $50,000. Chávez has repeatedly questioned U.S. involvement in a short-lived coup on him on April 12, 2002 when the president was briefly overthrown. The documents show the NED tripled its funding from about $250,000 to nearly $900,000 between 2000 and 2001 in the lead up to the attempted ouster. NED also sponsored controversial exit polls for the recall referendum in which the percentage of voteres supporting Chávez was significantly less than in the official election results.

Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Slovakia

The NED played a controversial role in the November, 2004 elections in the Ukraine. In an article in the Washington Post, NED director Nadia Diuk acknowledges the controversy: "Some have sought to portray the events in Ukraine as orchestrated in the West, a model executed with the support of Western pro-democracy foundations." Comparing this to similar recent interventions in Slovakia, Serbia and Georgia, she writes, "Some commentators believe that the similarity of their actions proves they are part of a U.S.-sponsored plot, an effort to extend American influence throughout the world." Choosing her words carefully, Diuk does not dismiss these charges outright, but strongly implies that critics are overlooking a genuinely "home-grown" aspect to the "election revolts" in these Eastern European countries. She acknowledges as well that "...there was a massive effort by nongovernmental organizations to monitor the vote, whether through parallel vote tabulations, exit polls or reports from domestic observers. These strategies were supported by the reports of Western election observers," and that "all these breakthrough elections have been accomplished with the vigorous participation of civic groups that support free and fair elections by monitoring the media, carrying out voter education, publicizing the platforms of candidates in the absence of a free press, training election observers, conducting polls and so on."

Source of Funding

The NED receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. budget and while a non-governmental organisation is subject to congressional oversight. In the financial year to the end of September 2002 NED had a budget of US$48.5 million.

The NED also receives funding from various foundations. The Bradley Foundation has provided the most to date, nearly US$1.5 million in the past 18 years to support the Journal Of Democracy.

Links with other think tanks

Directors of the Board includes Frank Charles Carlucci III of The Carlyle Group, General Wesley Clark, of venture capital company the Stephens Group, Michael Novak of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Dr. Francis Fukuyama, Johns Hopkins SAIS, and Evan Bayh current chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council.

See also

External links

Category: