Revision as of 14:23, 27 February 2008 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:Swatjester/archive14.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:26, 27 February 2008 edit undo68.175.69.223 (talk) →More SanchezNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. ]] ] 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | :I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. ]] ] 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Far too many activist editors on this site. I am a "writer", I do make my living through writing and I'm currently with Human Events. As well as the war correspondent for Worldnetdaily. | |||
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25185 | |||
This information has not been reflected in the article ] | |||
Get rid of eleens. He/she is disruptive. ] (]) 22:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Unbiased Editor for Sanchez Article== | |||
Could you recommend an unbiased editor to contribute to the site? Preferably someone with a military background and is not attached to an LGBT project. ] (]) 23:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:26, 27 February 2008
Φ
SPR
Thanks for the protect. This article always gets hit hard during school vacations.--Lepeu1999 (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Matt Sanchez picture
If the assertion of bad faith is warranted by relevant and strong evidence, I don't think it's an assumption. But I won't continue to revert - I don't have a strong opinion on the issue. Kalkin (talk) 02:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. ⇒SWATJester 02:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts
Thank you for your edits in Supreme Court of the United States on the judicial usurpation/activism section. Glad to know it was not just me. Magidin (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. The fun part is seeing how far that extends in other sections. ⇒SWATJester 20:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Red Faction
There's an IP editing Red Faction that I can't figure out. First he blanks, and then he spams. He has now added onto the article stuff that I can't honestly delete and call it vandalism. Can you check it out? -WarthogDemon 02:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure. ⇒SWATJester 02:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's advertising, I've removed it and semiprotected.⇒SWATJester 02:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
More Sanchez
So there *are* other admins watching the article! Good. Please let me know if I a) overstep or b) understep - I feel like I might be getting too close sometimes, and I feel like I'm too new with the mop to know what and when to clean up. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. ⇒SWATJester 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Far too many activist editors on this site. I am a "writer", I do make my living through writing and I'm currently with Human Events. As well as the war correspondent for Worldnetdaily.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25185
This information has not been reflected in the article Matt Sanchez
Get rid of eleens. He/she is disruptive. 68.175.69.223 (talk) 22:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Unbiased Editor for Sanchez Article
Could you recommend an unbiased editor to contribute to the site? Preferably someone with a military background and is not attached to an LGBT project. 68.175.69.223 (talk) 23:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)