Misplaced Pages

User talk:FayssalF: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:45, 29 February 2008 editFayssalF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users43,085 edits archiving← Previous edit Revision as of 12:36, 1 March 2008 edit undoWandalstouring (talk | contribs)14,383 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 60: Line 60:
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; color: " | In gratitude for your coordination services to the ], from August 2007 to February 2008, please accept this barnstar.--]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 18:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray; color: " | In gratitude for your coordination services to the ], from August 2007 to February 2008, please accept this barnstar.--]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 18:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
|} |}

== expanding Muslim military history task force ==

I have been reelected coordinator and brought up the old discussion about expanding Muslim military history to the present day. This has been an issue raised by Muslim editors when the task force was founded. It would be great if you could help expanding the articles that present what makes Islams treatment of war effect especially the Muslim warfare. I have been reading a bit on the topic and can help you with advice, but feel myself not confident enough with my limited knowledge. ] (]) 12:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:36, 1 March 2008

userpage • contributions • edit info • This editor is an elephant administrator
Notes, Babel and Archives
It's not an . It's a joke!
By the way, vandalism creates spiritual turbulence, resulting in misfortune.

DON'T BE OFFENSIVE!

Archives Older discussions are found here:
1st Floor, 2nd F, 3rd F, 4th F, 5th F, 6th F, 7th F, 8th F, 9th F, 10th F, 11th F, 12th F, 13th F, 14th F, 15th F, 16th F, 17th F, 18th F, 19th F, 20th F, 21st F, 22nd F, 23rd F, 24th F, 25th F, 26th F, 27th F, 28th F, 29th F, 30th F, 31th F, 32th F
If I have started a conversation on your talk page, feel free to respond here. If you leave a message for me here, I will respond there and here as well.

BABEL

Wikimedia Commons logoThis user contributes to Wikimedia Commons.
40,000 This user has over 40,000 edits on the English Misplaced Pages.
This user participates in Pages needing translation into English.
This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.
This user is a participant of
WikiProject
Countering systemic bias.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Morocco.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Military history.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Spain.
This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English.
اللغة الام لهذا المستخدم هي العربية.
Cet utilisateur parle français à un niveau comparable à la langue maternelle.
Este usario puede contribuir con un nivel avanzado en Español.
Ĉi tiu uzanto povas komuniki per baza nivelo de Esperanto.
Questo utente può contribuire con un italiano di livello semplice.
This user is Moroccan.
ind This user is politically independent.
This user is a Citizen of the World (Terra, ⊕).
C#This user can program in C#.
33This user is 33 years old.
This user BOINCs.
This user supports moral equality amongst great apes and humans.
This user is car-free.
This user owns one or more Siamese cats.
Ongoing discussions

Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

Regarding this case, I know a lot of discussion is floating around, but I really feel strongly about this and wanted to get more attention to this comment I made:

If any of the arbs are reading these messages, I beg of you to accept a proposal that limits TTN's actions only when challenged. Like the others, I'm still not convinced TTN has even done something grossly wrong, but it's far better than the current proposal, allows TTN to preform non-controversial actions, and addresses the core issue of force rather than content judgements.

TTN might have had a liberal interpretation of ArbCom's instructions from the last case, but something like this would be a lot more clear cut, and I have no doubt he would follow it. Perhaps this could be given a trial time of a week or two, and if not effective then simply default to the 1.1 proposal that you are supporting now. I really believe this issue comes down to when situations where forced when challenged, and not the initial editorial actions. He would learn a lot from that kind of six month (or whatever) probation, and still be able to be constructive on Misplaced Pages. I also believe it's something that both "sides" would be able to live with. -- Ned Scott 04:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

A personal thank you

The WikiProject Barnstar
As a thank you for your coordination services to the Military history WikiProject, from February to August 2007, please accept this belated barnstar.--ROGER DAVIES  18:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


The WikiProject Barnstar
In gratitude for your coordination services to the Military history WikiProject, from August 2007 to February 2008, please accept this barnstar.--ROGER DAVIES  18:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

expanding Muslim military history task force

I have been reelected coordinator and brought up the old discussion about expanding Muslim military history to the present day. This has been an issue raised by Muslim editors when the task force was founded. It would be great if you could help expanding the articles that present what makes Islams treatment of war effect especially the Muslim warfare. I have been reading a bit on the topic and can help you with advice, but feel myself not confident enough with my limited knowledge. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)