| Revision as of 03:55, 2 March 2008 editMajoreditor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,606 edits →Hulk (comics): indent← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:40, 2 March 2008 edit undoThuranX (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers20,147 edits →Hulk (comics): All hail David Fuchs!Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::It's gotten even uglier than before on Hulk's talk page, and the article has taken some interesting turns. Did someone explode a gamma bomb? | ::It's gotten even uglier than before on Hulk's talk page, and the article has taken some interesting turns. Did someone explode a gamma bomb? | ||
| ::I'm going to let things calm down for a few days before re-examining the article. ] (]) 03:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I'm going to let things calm down for a few days before re-examining the article. ] (]) 03:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::Your involvement is unneeded, Majoreditor. There is no need for a reassessment, as I keep saying. You will all be wasting your time. The article is a pile of steaming dogshit, don't you understand? Only David Fuchs can fix it. He will fix it, and then will re-award it GA Status, and then FA Status. Do you really think he needs your consensus for this? He's David Fuchs! He can circumvent our core policies! He's David Fuchs! He doesn't have to follow rules! He's David Fuchs! The new messiah of Misplaced Pages, here to save us all from hard work and consensus based GA reviews that pass but never should have! ALL HAIL DAVID FUCHS! ] (]) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:40, 2 March 2008
Hulk (comics)
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page
- Result pending
This article has undergone some problems. It was listed, apparently wrongly, and the primary author delisted it. However, another editor disagreed that the article had been delisted, causing some problems. I nominate it now to get a clear consensus from other editors, thus avoiding any confusion/unnecessary revertion. Thanks, PeterSymonds | talk 20:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- No review is needed. An admin feels that the article was improperly passed and listed. As such, it has been delisted. This is an open and shut case. Do not waste reviewer time with this case.ThuranX (talk) 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Comment Primary author of this article, ThuranX, should refrain from listing/delisting this article due to WP:COI. OhanaUnited 01:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Question and comment. Does anyone contest the de-listing? If so, please step forward and tell us why you think the article should still be listed as GA-class. Majoreditor (talk) 03:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I can't comment on whether or not the article actually qualifies as a GA-class article (whether it does now or ever did, I don't know), but I will say that the de-listing seems to have been done in bad faith because ThuranX is angry at an administrator, DavidFuchs, who does not believe it should be rated GA and has rewritten large sections of the article since the GA-class was awarded. All of this, plus recent chatter on the article's talk page, should be kept in mind. BOZ (talk) 04:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's gotten even uglier than before on Hulk's talk page, and the article has taken some interesting turns. Did someone explode a gamma bomb?
- I'm going to let things calm down for a few days before re-examining the article. Majoreditor (talk) 03:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Your involvement is unneeded, Majoreditor. There is no need for a reassessment, as I keep saying. You will all be wasting your time. The article is a pile of steaming dogshit, don't you understand? Only David Fuchs can fix it. He will fix it, and then will re-award it GA Status, and then FA Status. Do you really think he needs your consensus for this? He's David Fuchs! He can circumvent our core policies! He's David Fuchs! He doesn't have to follow rules! He's David Fuchs! The new messiah of Misplaced Pages, here to save us all from hard work and consensus based GA reviews that pass but never should have! ALL HAIL DAVID FUCHS! ThuranX (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)