| Revision as of 20:14, 1 March 2008 editRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits talk page | Revision as of 23:27, 3 March 2008 edit undoMastCell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators43,155 edits →Edit-warring, Arbitration Commitee findings, etc.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| I would suggest you discuss your view on ]. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow ] and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- ] (]) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC) | I would suggest you discuss your view on ]. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow ] and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- ] (]) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit-warring, Arbitration Commitee findings, etc. == | |||
| You appear to be engaged in an ] on the article ]. Please note that edit-warring is strongly discouraged; making more than 3 reverts in a 24-hour period will lead to a block under the ], although ''any'' amount of edit-warring is harmful and blocks may result from fewer than 3 reverts. Please don't revert the article further: use the article talk page to discuss the disputed content, and consider the steps outlined in ] if you're unable to reach consensus. | |||
| Additionally, please note that articles relating to Israeli-Arab issues may be subject to specific sanctions under the ] recent decision found ]. This is a formal warning that the tolerance for edit-warring or other unconstructive behavior on these articles is especially low given a long history of problematic conduct on these articles. Practically, this means that you should make an extra effort to ] and ], ], and avoid ] and ]. If in doubt, it's best to seek outside input via the steps outlined in ]. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 23:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:27, 3 March 2008
Council on American-Islamic Relations
I would suggest you discuss your view on the talk page. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow WP:CIVIL and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Edit-warring, Arbitration Commitee findings, etc.
You appear to be engaged in an edit war on the article Council on American-Islamic Relations. Please note that edit-warring is strongly discouraged; making more than 3 reverts in a 24-hour period will lead to a block under the three-revert rule, although any amount of edit-warring is harmful and blocks may result from fewer than 3 reverts. Please don't revert the article further: use the article talk page to discuss the disputed content, and consider the steps outlined in dispute resolution if you're unable to reach consensus.
Additionally, please note that articles relating to Israeli-Arab issues may be subject to specific sanctions under the Arbitration Committee's recent decision found here. This is a formal warning that the tolerance for edit-warring or other unconstructive behavior on these articles is especially low given a long history of problematic conduct on these articles. Practically, this means that you should make an extra effort to remain cool and civil, avoid personal attacks, and avoid disruptive editing and edit-warring. If in doubt, it's best to seek outside input via the steps outlined in dispute resolution. MastCell 23:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)