| Revision as of 09:58, 22 May 2007 view sourceRiana (talk | contribs)36,950 edits this bot is weird.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:28, 6 March 2008 view source John Reaves (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,487 editsm Reverted edits by MZMcBride (talk) to last version by Kurykh | ||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{banned}} | |||
| {{sockpuppeteerproven|blocked}} | |||
| == Danny's RfA == | |||
| I think you had better read the comments on your vote in ]. Perhaps you are in the wrong project as a comment stated. I have given what I said in your editor review some thought, and I have decided that perhaps democracy isn't all it is cracked up to be. I think Danny gave an impression of "I'm Danny. Vote for me." in his RfA, but he has proven that he has been a major contributor to Misplaced Pages in the past and has been a very important admin in the project. I will continue to support him even though you raised many important concerns in his RfA. ] ] 17:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Well this is going to sound very weird, but I have thought, since I started editing here, that many of Misplaced Pages's policies and goals are impossible to achieve. I have never thought that concensus can successfully happen except in the most basic of questions. I consider ], ], ] all to be impossible to attain, so I don't think Danny made such a terrible breach with ]. Sorry. ] ] 23:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==A deep concern== | |||
| Regarding your comment on Danny's RfA, I think your oppose rationale is terribly flawed. Demanding that he apologize for implementing actions at the behest of Jimbo Wales to protect the project is unkind, shortsighted, and, in my opinion, petty. You've expressed an interest in becoming an administrator in the future, but at the current juncture, I feel I would have to oppose based on your conduct and the lack of judgment reflected in the text of your oppose. Please note, my intention is not to upset you, nor is this some sort of 'retaliation' because we disagree on the RfA (I'm supporting the candidate, but many of the oppose arguments are very well written, logical, and I respect their opinions while disagreeing on the larger scope). I ask you to please consider updating your oppose rationale to something other than what it is now. From a strategic standpoint, it hinders the opposition. More importantly, from a human standpoint, it is desperately out of touch with many basic virtues and sends a message that I'm certain you didn't mean to send about yourself. This is an expression of concern that I hope you will receive in the spirit it was sent. - ]</small> (]) 23:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mooninite.PNG)== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. ] 04:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == no hard feelings of course... == | |||
| Don't worry. I still disagree with you and believe Danny's comment was perfectly reasonable given the pretty unreasonable attack (and I mean ''that'' particular oppose !vote, many of the rest are perfectly legitimate). But maybe I should have been more careful and I suppose my comment (however liberating!) isn't particularly constructive. Cheers, ] 22:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you for the welcome! == | |||
| ...and all the great links. I am sure they will be a great help! | |||
| ''']''' {{time}} | |||
| * Thanks for your welcome. I felt alone in a large unknown world. Now I know where I am. ] 08:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| You have been blocked per checkuser evidence of sockpuppetry . – ] 00:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Apparently the block has been extended indefinitely. <span style="font-size:95%">—], your friendly neighborhood ''']'''.</span> 03:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, that was me. You're welcome to explain yourself using {{tl|unblock}}, emailing unblock-en-l or emailing ]. ] ] 06:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ah, the Misplaced Pages justice system, where the prosecution is a mob that plays judge, jury and executioner and the defense gets to know about the death sentence passed upon them once they get to the court! | |||
| Don't worry, i've been here before, I can be here again. :) | |||
| To the decent people left on Misplaced Pages, don't worry, chances are that i'll be back to help you keep things miserable for people who don't care about others. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:{{{2|}}}| {{{2}}}|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
| : Speaking as a (self-proclaimed) decent mouse left on Misplaced Pages ... please, don't. Spreading misery around helps no one. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion to block or ban == | |||
| I have opened a discussion about you at ]. I agree that things were done too quickly a few days ago, and a more sober consideration of the situation is needed. If you wish to comment, you may post a statement here and I will copy it over to the discussion. ] 13:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:28, 6 March 2008
Redirect to: