Irredentism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:19, 8 March 2008 editMoreschi (talk \| contribs)19,434 edits →Other claims: if you're going to have this at least make it a little less POV. Using English, as opposed to semi-gobbledegook, would also be nice← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:34, 9 March 2008 edit undoAzad chai (talk \| contribs)7 edits remove racism, also explain myself in talkNext edit →
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Some of the most violent irredentist conflicts of recent times in ] flared up as a consequence of the break-up of the former ] in the early 1990s. The wars in ] and ] were largely about creating a new political framework of states, each of which would be ethnically and politically homogeneous. The conflict erupted further south with the ethnic Albanian majority in ] seeking to switch allegiance to the adjoining state of ]. (See Chazan, 1991, Irredentism and international politics.) ] claims that the use of the name ] by its northern neighbor belays an irredentist claim on the northern province of ] in Greece.		Some of the most violent irredentist conflicts of recent times in ] flared up as a consequence of the break-up of the former ] in the early 1990s. The wars in ] and ] were largely about creating a new political framework of states, each of which would be ethnically and politically homogeneous. The conflict erupted further south with the ethnic Albanian majority in ] seeking to switch allegiance to the adjoining state of ]. (See Chazan, 1991, Irredentism and international politics.) ] claims that the use of the name ] by its northern neighbor belays an irredentist claim on the northern province of ] in Greece.

	Another debated case is the alleged Armenian irredentist project in the ] region of ].<ref> </ref> In view of the prominent expert on irredentist movements, Thomas Ambrosio, "from ] to the cease-fire in ] ] encountered a highly permissive or tolerant international environment that allowed its annexation of some 15 percent of Azerbaijani territory". <ref>Thomas Ambrosio. Irredentism. Ethnic Conflict and International Politics, Praeger Publisher, 2001, pp.148</ref> ] denies its direct involvement in the ]. In view of Nadia Milanova, Nagorno-Karabakh represents a combination of separatism and irredentism. <ref> Nadia Milanova. The Territory-Identity Nexus in the Conflict over Nagorno Karabakh: Implications for OSCE Peace Efforts, Human Rights Without Frontiers International, 2003</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Revision as of 01:34, 9 March 2008

Irredentism is any position advocating annexation of territories administered by another state on the grounds of common ethnicity or prior historical possession, actual or alleged. Some of these movements are also called pan movements. It is a feature of identity politics and cultural and political geography. Since most borders have been moved and redrawn at one point, a great many countries could theoretically present irredentist claims to their neighbours.

However, some states are the subject of potential irredentism from birth. Post-WWI Eastern Europe, the Balkans, and the Near East had borders carved out by the Allies that left many of the new states in that region unsatisfied due to minority populations and conflicting historical claims. Many of Africa's borders were artificially imposed by European colonial powers. The result split ethnic groups between different countries, such as the Igbo who are divided among Nigeria, Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea. In some cases, the irredentist arguing continued well past the Second World War and on to the present day.

An area that may be subjected to a potential claim is therefore sometimes called an irredenta. Not all irredentas are involved in actual irredentism.

Origins

Main article: Italia irredenta

The word was coined in Italy from the phrase Italia irredenta ("unredeemed Italy"). This originally referred to Austro-Hungarian rule over mostly or partly Italian-inhabited territories such as Trentino and Trieste during the 19th and early 20th century.

A common way to express a claim to adjacent territories on the grounds of historical or ethnic association is by using the epithet "Greater" before the country name. This conveys the image of national territory at its maximum conceivable extent with the country "proper" at its core. It must be noted that the use of "Greater" does not always convey an irredentistic meaning. For instance, Greater Romania is the common translation given to the Romanian term "Romania Mare", which is the name given between the two World Wars to the Kingdom of Romania. Romania claimed irredenta over Transylvania and Bessarabia after World War I. The term was also used by Germans referring to Greater Germany, a state consisting of pre World War I Germany, actual Austria and the Sudetenland.

Constitutional irredentism

Some states formalize their irredentist claims by including them in their constitutional documents.

Argentina. Part III, Section 1 of the Constitution of Argentina states that "The Argentine Nation ratifies its legitimate and non-prescribing sovereignty over the Malvinas (Falkland Islands), South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands and over the corresponding maritime and insular zones, as they are an integral part of the national territory. The recovery of said territories and the full exercise of sovereignty, respectful of the way of life of their inhabitants and according to the principles of international law, are a permanent and unrelinquished goal of the Argentine people."

People's Republic of China. The preamble to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China states "Taiwan is part of the sacred territory of the People's Republic of China. It is the lofty duty of the entire Chinese people, including our compatriots in Taiwan, to accomplish the great task of reunifying the motherland." The PRC claim to sovereignty over Taiwan is generally based on the successor state theory, whereby the PRC is the legally recognized successor state to the Republic of China.

Republic of China. Article 4 of the 'Constitution of the Republic of China originally stated that: "The territory of the Republic of China within its existing national boundaries shall not be altered except by a resolution of the National Assembly" although recent constitutional changes have moved this power to that of a national referendum.

The Republic of China has not formally renounced claims to the areas currently controlled by the People's Republic of China, Mongolia, and parts of Russia (Tuvan Republic), Burma and other Central Asian states bordering China, though it no longer actively pursues these claims. Ironically, for the ROC to renounce claims on the Mainland would be regarded as a declaration of Taiwan independence by the PRC which could likely provoke military intervention.

Comoros. Article 1 of the Constitution of the Union of the Comoros begins: "The Union of the Comoros is a republic, composed of the autonomous islands of Mohéli, Mayotte, Anjouan, and Grande Comore." Mayotte, geographically a part of the Comoro Islands, was the only island of the four to vote against independence from France (a 63%-37% majority) in the referendum held December 22, 1974. The total vote was 94%-5% in favor of independence. Mayotte is currently a "departmental collectivity" of the French Republic.

India. From 1950 onward India has claimed Jammu and Kashmir as part of the state's "national territory" as well as Pakistan-administered Kashmir (which Indians refer to as Pakistan-occupied Kashmir) and Aksai Chin (which Indians refer to as China-occupied Kashmir).

Pakistan. From 1950 onward Pakistan has claimed Jammu and Kashmir (which Pakistan refers to as Indian-occupied Kashmir), as part of their state's "national territory." Pakistan also claims Azad Kashmir.

Republic of Ireland/United Kingdom. From 1937 until 1999, articles 2 and 3 of the constitution of the Republic of Ireland, the part that had seceded from the UK, claimed that "he national territory consists of the whole island of Ireland". However, "ending the re-integration of the national territory", the powers of the state were restricted to legislate only for the area that had seceded. Arising from the Northern Ireland peace process, the matter was mutually resolved in 1999. The United Kingdom repealed the 1920 act and the Republic of Ireland's constitution was altered by referendum. The amended constitution asserts that while it is the entitlement of "every person born in the island of Ireland ... to be part of the Irish Nation" and to hold Irish citizenship, "a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island." Certain joint policy and executive bodies were created between Northern Ireland, the part of the island that remained in the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Ireland, and these were given executive authority. The advisory and consultative role of the government of the Republic of Ireland in the government of Northern Ireland by the United Kingdom, that had begun with the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement, was maintained.

Somalia Prior to its break-up as a functioning state, the Somali constitution contained paragraphs explicitly claiming adjacent territories to form a "Greater Somalia". The present Transitional Federal Charter (TFC) of the new Transitional Federal Government (TFG) clearly claims territories which comprise the self-declared independent nation of Somaliland, thus asserting sovereignty over territory of the former Somali Republic.

Other claims

Spain continues to claim the British overseas territory of Gibraltar, ceded to Britain in 1713 under the Treaty of Utrecht, and argues its case at the United Nations claiming its territorial integrity is affected. Morocco makes similar claims against Spain over the North African city enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.

Some of the most violent irredentist conflicts of recent times in Europe flared up as a consequence of the break-up of the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. The wars in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were largely about creating a new political framework of states, each of which would be ethnically and politically homogeneous. The conflict erupted further south with the ethnic Albanian majority in Kosovo seeking to switch allegiance to the adjoining state of Albania. (See Chazan, 1991, Irredentism and international politics.) Greece claims that the use of the name Republic of Macedonia by its northern neighbor belays an irredentist claim on the northern province of Macedonia in Greece.

References

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this article. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Irredentism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Misplaced Pages