Revision as of 02:00, 11 March 2008 editJéské Couriano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers40,091 edits Reinstate TBM's concern← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:01, 11 March 2008 edit undoThright (talk | contribs)572 edits rv due to vandalism, stop flooding pleaseNext edit → | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
::::Well, I'm not sure what my age or ethnicity have to do with anything, but please do point out what Wiki policy it violates. ] (]) 01:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::Well, I'm not sure what my age or ethnicity have to do with anything, but please do point out what Wiki policy it violates. ] (]) 01:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::: 1st Policy, "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. It is clear that this content would not be found in encyclopdia. 2nd,Misplaced Pages is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. 2 for starters. 3rd LAW, speech has limits, one is social good. This may be more advanced for some of the users on wiki as I am sure many have not studied law. ] (]) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright | ::::: 1st Policy, "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. It is clear that this content would not be found in encyclopdia. 2nd,Misplaced Pages is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. 2 for starters. 3rd LAW, speech has limits, one is social good. This may be more advanced for some of the users on wiki as I am sure many have not studied law. ] (]) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright | ||
:::::: Take a look at ]. Misplaced Pages is not an encyclopedia in the sense that Britannica is. Plus, I see that you've been a member of the Misplaced Pages community for a whopping three days. Take it from somebody who's been editing for more than two years: you're not going to win this. Plus, "fuck" is a word unto itself, it is not a stub. ] (]) 01:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::There is a difference between a disambiguation page and a real article. You are also ]. ] (]) 01:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I'm older than 22, and again, It is a perfectly valid disambiguation page that links to perfectly valid articles. Cease with your disruption thanks. -- ]\<sup>]</sup> 01:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:01, 11 March 2008
Why do you want a barnstar? People give them in recognition of good work. If you don't do the work first they are meaningless. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- I guess your right. If it holds any weight, I like the look of them! Thright (talk) 21:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)thright
Re:Range block
Not necessary, as it's not a recurring problem at the moment. Please note that the blocking policy stipulates that blocking is not a preventive measure. Sephiroth BCR 06:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- answered on your talk page
Re:Barnstar
Many thanks. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR 06:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Re:Barnstar
Thanks! I try! :) I also notice you are a new editor and have not received a welcome! so here's one! And dont let others get you down, just remember what you have read of the rules and follow to that. Remember (as most do not) we are all human and we all make mistakes! I know i have! :) If you need any help, please don't hesitate to ask me! I will do everything i can to help you find the information you need! :) ✬Dillard421✬ 07:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- thanks! glad to be here
--
|
Re: CHL
Actually, you would be incorrect. Especially now, as Hockey Canada changed the rules in 2005 to help bolster midget hockey. In the CHL, 15 year olds can only play in exceptional circumstances, and each of the major-junior leagues has a cap on how many 16 year olds they can use. The WHL drafts 14 year olds out of Bantam hockey, and the Tavares case is noted as well, but in all cases, the player was 15 before he played major-junior. Resolute 14:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Would you care to explain to me your edit summary here? My comment to you was in no way biased, nor was it "wiki politically motivated" - in fact I'm not even sure what you mean by that. I am attempting to help you, , you would be better off engaging in a dialog instead of attacking others. Thanks, Gwernol 17:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- answered on your talk page
My RfA
Just want to say thank you for your last minute support in the RfA and I really do appreciate your comments. If anything it's been a huge learning experience and I hope to live up to the trust bestowed on me. If you need anything feel free to get a hold of me. Regards – Zedla (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, good luck getting the page deleted.
But I can promise you that admin won't accept your reason valid. See also: WP:NOT#CENSORED, it's up to you if you believe me or not, but you will see the truth when an admin reviews this. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- And believe me they will most likely lead you to WP:NOT#CENSORED. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 01:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- You must have missed this section, Misplaced Pages is not a directory! The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word.Thright (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
- It is a perfectly valid disambiguation page that links to perfectly valid articles. C1k3 (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Incorrect, I see that you are 22 years of age. Wait until you become older! In any cause you failed to read all wiki policies. Furthermore speech has limits, being Jewish I am sure you will understand this. Thright (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
- Well, I'm not sure what my age or ethnicity have to do with anything, but please do point out what Wiki policy it violates. C1k3 (talk) 01:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- 1st Policy, "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. It is clear that this content would not be found in encyclopdia. 2nd,Misplaced Pages is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. 2 for starters. 3rd LAW, speech has limits, one is social good. This may be more advanced for some of the users on wiki as I am sure many have not studied law. Thright (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
- Well, I'm not sure what my age or ethnicity have to do with anything, but please do point out what Wiki policy it violates. C1k3 (talk) 01:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Incorrect, I see that you are 22 years of age. Wait until you become older! In any cause you failed to read all wiki policies. Furthermore speech has limits, being Jewish I am sure you will understand this. Thright (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright
- It is a perfectly valid disambiguation page that links to perfectly valid articles. C1k3 (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)