Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:01, 17 March 2008

Archive 1 - Edits on "SC language"
Archive 2 - Srijem issues
Archive 3 - W.Herzog, Stjepan and Montenegro issues
Archive 4 - Cro-Ser questions, very interesting discussion, many topic being opened/touched/resolved
Archive 5 - Some Doclea and Dalmatia issues
Archive 6 - Farsi, Diego, NHL, Stjepan
Archive 7 - Republic of Dubrovnik, Haydn, various
Archive 8 - Mostly vandalism dealing, Zadar, Mikalja
Archive 9 - Saborsko, RfARB, prop, ...

Irridenta, reply

Yep, no problem. Leave it with me. I might need a few days as I seem to have about 5 mins a day for Wiki now. F++k. Meanwhile, you've read the nonsenses on my talk between me and some IPs about Dalmatia? They're talking about love and international understanding. Zen reverted the latest rubbish today. We're so lucky to have Italian imperialists to advise us how to think. Ho hum. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Ignorants, it does not exists the word "irridenta" in Italian! BTW, "Enjoy" the independence of Kosovo! Finally, the Slavs have lost some territories in ex-Yugoslavia since WWII and withdraw from Albanian Kosovo.....As you can see, the legacy of your Tito (with his ethnic cleansing) is starting to disappear..."Enjoy" and wait to see what will be the next withdrawal.--Cherso (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Italianization

I think that now is right time for deleting this article and then moving of article Fascist Italianization on his place. Yes this other article need to be expanded but it will work. Maybe you can ask for voting for deletion of first article ? --Rjecina (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

See this !?! This is becoming total insanity... I've reverted some of these... It should be done with all of it... Zenanarh (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Inflammatory

You are correct. I should stay above the fray. Been a long night (between the GM guy and an IP address I seemed to have annoyed). Thanks. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Italian Partisans

When I said "Italian Partisans" I did not mean "Italian members of the Yugoslav Partisans" but "members of the Italian Resistance Movement". It's well known that Tito's partisans have no sympathy for non-communist partisans, even if they were Yugoslav. There are some reported episodes of Italian non-communist Partisans who were killed by Yugoslav Partisans. Check what I wrote the last time . Hmmm, maybe it's "Stara Gorica", I know only a few words in Slovenian. Clap (talk) 16:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
The Italian Resistance was active on the whole territory occupied directly or indirectly by the Nazis after the Armistice with Allies was publicly declared (8 september 1943), so it was active also in the area of the NE border. The relation with the Yugoslav Partisans was very complex. In a few words, the Communists collaborated while the non-communist partisans tried to remain autonomous. There were some tragic episodes such as the one in Porzûs (described in Italian resistance movement). Clap (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

NATO

We are having similar thinking about NATO and Croatia, so can you please help my poor english in "my" article Bolje pakt nego rat --Rjecina (talk) 04:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Pagania

Hi. You have edited on talk page in article Pagania about question if population of this state has been Serbs, South Slavs or Croats. After my comments on talk page that there is consensus between editors because result in user comments are 10:1 user in minority has demanded active discussion about this. Because of that all editors on talk page has been invited to write thinking so that this question ulmost 3 years after it is opened can be closed with vote.--Rjecina (talk) 00:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Next time when you start to edit article which is under dispute between established users and nationalistic SPA accounts can you please try not to make radical changes of original article which we try to protect . I am banned for reverting because I have protected your POV version in time when I have been thinking that I am protecting original version of article.--Rjecina (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, so this user sneaked in the offending material ? Kubura, please take this as a serious warning. You cannot honestly believe that what you wrote there was making the article more neutral. Striving for NPOV is the absolutely most crucial obligation that every member of this project must follow, and failure to do so will ultimately get you sanctioned. Rjecina, sorry for blaming you for this, I can understand you may have overlooked these additions in the heat of battle. (But then again, that's precisely why fast revert-warring is so bad.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Sources

Hvala, ta informacija mi je bila jako potrebna. pozz- --Jesuislafete (talk) 20:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)