Revision as of 19:18, 16 March 2008 editWizardman (talk | contribs)Administrators400,313 edits archiving← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:48, 22 March 2008 edit undo89.242.80.51 (talk) You have altered the content as a result of my complaint!Next edit → | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
I have rearranged some material to put it in a more chronological/developmental form. I think the involvement with evolutionary and ethological concepts should go earlier than details of his later published works. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 17:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | I have rearranged some material to put it in a more chronological/developmental form. I think the involvement with evolutionary and ethological concepts should go earlier than details of his later published works. ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 17:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
No you have not. | |||
You have altered the content as a result of my complaint. | |||
Where are your sources? | |||
You have not included sources because they lie in the complaint. | |||
You are a complete and absolute disgrace! | |||
You have sought to confuse the theory of Maternal deprivation with the Attachment Theory | |||
STOP YOUR VANDALISM! | |||
] (]) 10:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:48, 22 March 2008
Biography: Science and Academia B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Psychology B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Archive 1 of previous discussion
Archive 2 of previous discussion
Photo of father and child irrelavant but picture of mother and child relevant. Why?
Compare amendment made to this page with photo of mother and child on;-
http://en.wikipedia.org/Attachment_theory
Kingsley Miller
answer; editorial bias —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingsleyMiller (talk • contribs) 17:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kip - please try to assume good faith. There was no picture of a mother and child on this page. This is a biography of Bowlby and was supposed to have a picture of Bowlby but it got removed. Further you've put that same picture on quite a number of number of articles now.Fainites 21:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Maternal Deprivation -dates
You cannot give EXACT dates for the effects of maternal deprivation. To do so would be silly as each child is not exactly the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingsleyMiller (talk • contribs) 18:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I SHOULD LIKE TO CALL A 'TRUCE' ON THIS PAGE REGARDING THE THEORY OF MATERNAL DEPRIVATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WIK PROCEDURE FOR ARBITRATION.
I have fundamental concerns about the edits to this section by Fainties
22:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Please see maternal deprivation talkpage for the substance of this discussion. Fainites 00:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I have rearranged some material to put it in a more chronological/developmental form. I think the involvement with evolutionary and ethological concepts should go earlier than details of his later published works. Fainites 17:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
No you have not.
You have altered the content as a result of my complaint.
Where are your sources?
You have not included sources because they lie in the complaint.
You are a complete and absolute disgrace!
You have sought to confuse the theory of Maternal deprivation with the Attachment Theory
STOP YOUR VANDALISM!
89.242.80.51 (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories: