| Revision as of 14:21, 24 March 2008 editPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:16, 24 March 2008 edit undoGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits →Notice of WP:ARBMAC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| This is a warning you are in violation of ] for your edits of ]. You stated that the edit at 19:52, 22 March 2008 by 88.198.45.143 was an edit made by you so in the next 24 hours you reversed the page four times. --] (]) 21:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | This is a warning you are in violation of ] for your edits of ]. You stated that the edit at 19:52, 22 March 2008 by 88.198.45.143 was an edit made by you so in the next 24 hours you reversed the page four times. --] (]) 21:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Notice of ] == | |||
| {{uw-balkans}} Your prior talk page evidences some specific behaviors and concerns that have proven problematic. Without resolving the suspected sockpuppetry issues, your own edits make it clear that it is worth putting you on notice of the special restrictions that apply to editing in this area. ] 21:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:16, 24 March 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bosnian mujahideen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Blanchardb--timed 13:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
This is not true. Misplaced Pages is free, and people can have different views. Different view is constructive. You can talk about that in the discussion page.
- To tell you the truth, I am not knowledgeable about this subject. What I do see is you inserting a disputed change and telling others, "this is the way it's gonna be and now let's discuss it." In order for you to show good faith, since your edits have been reverted, you are to leave the article as is while the discussion is ongoing. --Blanchardb--timed 13:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Bosnian mujahideen, you will be blocked from editing. --Blanchardb--timed 14:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and you might want to take a look at Misplaced Pages:Edit war before you engage in any further action. --Blanchardb--timed 14:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/AhmadinV for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Blanchardb--timed 15:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
You are not right! You attack me since i come in Misplaced Pages. Do you hate me because I am Arab? I love all peoples. Ahmadin.
- Seriously, what makes you think you being an Arab has anything to do with it? Besides, I didn't know. --Blanchardb--timed 03:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I placed a question on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#User:AhmadinV for you:
- as I had neglected to place any information about this section on your talk page how did you find out about it? You seem very familiar with the workings of Misplaced Pages both at how to edit a page and with Misplaced Pages procedures. How long and have been editing Misplaced Pages and have you used any other accounts?
I would appreciate it if you would reply to the question on that page. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Warning
This is a warning you are in violation of Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule for your edits of Bosnian mujahideen. You stated that the edit at 19:52, 22 March 2008 by 88.198.45.143 was an edit made by you so in the next 24 hours you reversed the page four times. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Notice of WP:ARBMAC
{{subst:Contentious topics/alert|topic=b}} Your prior talk page evidences some specific behaviors and concerns that have proven problematic. Without resolving the suspected sockpuppetry issues, your own edits make it clear that it is worth putting you on notice of the special restrictions that apply to editing in this area. GRBerry 21:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)