| Revision as of 04:53, 27 March 2008 editJeremyMcCracken (talk | contribs)4,254 edits →South park animals← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:55, 27 March 2008 edit undoMasterpiece2000 (talk | contribs)13,003 edits →South park animals: Delete.Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' but move to ] (note capitalization) Appears to be in the vein of ]; the tone is a bit OR-ish (e.g. Kevin), but episodes of the show itself could be used as sources for most of it. ] (]) 04:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' but move to ] (note capitalization) Appears to be in the vein of ]; the tone is a bit OR-ish (e.g. Kevin), but episodes of the show itself could be used as sources for most of it. ] (]) 04:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per TenPoundHammer. ] (]) 04:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:55, 27 March 2008
South park animals
- South park animals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
In-universe list for which I can see no use. Was tagged for speedy, but does not meet any of the criteria. J Milburn (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Indiscriminate and unsourced information, full of original research ("Kevin may or may not be an animal"), difficult to verify, in-universe... you name it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Fancruft. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- "Cruft" is never a good argument per Misplaced Pages:ITSCRUFT, , and Misplaced Pages:Cruftcruft. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Original research. Cambrasa (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per above. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- per votes are generally considered weak. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep but move to South Park animals (note capitalization) Appears to be in the vein of South Park characters; the tone is a bit OR-ish (e.g. Kevin), but episodes of the show itself could be used as sources for most of it. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per TenPoundHammer. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 04:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)