Misplaced Pages

Rhumart: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 22:39, 30 March 2008 editArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 editsm moved User:CyclePat/Rhumart to Electro-magnetic therapeutic system: Revert. You're not the sole content author, so you may not userfy without permission.← Previous edit Revision as of 22:41, 30 March 2008 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 editsm Protected Electro-magnetic therapeutic system: block userfication by primary author while AfD is in progress Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 22:41, 30 March 2008

An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.
Find sources: "Rhumart" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FElectro-magnetic+therapeutic+system%5D%5DAFD
Dr. Drolet's 1990 Copyrighted (Rhumart System), "MBI-3000 RESC Controller", model # 7802.

Electro-magnetic therapeutic system is the English title of Canadian Patent 1,113,156 which was issued in 1981. The inventors Dr. Roland A. Drolet and Gaetan Charland, both from Canada, claimed that the device was an "electro-magnetic device for treating various types of rheumatic and arthritic diseases."

History

On the 24 of November 1981 Dr. Drolet and Mr. Charland received patent approval for their electro-magnetic therapeutic system. Their drawings, as portrayed within the Canadian patent, labeled the device "Ri - 2000 MAGNETOTHERAPY SYSTEM". By 1983, Dr. Drolet and Mr. Charland where issued another patent titled "ELECTRO-MAGNETIC THERAPEUTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD" which described the "Ri - 2000" in much further details and labeled the device as "Ri -2000 RHUMART-THERAPY SYSTEM". This second patent maintained many similar characteristics to the 1981 patent. In fact both patents drew and labeled their devices with "RODROL INSTRUMENTATION INC.". Free World Trust was the rightfull owners of the patents of invention numbered 1,113,156 (the “'156 patent”) and 1,150,361 (the “'361 patent”) issued in 1981 and 1983 respectively.

On December 15 2000, in the case of Free World Trust v. Électro Santé Inc., a decission was rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada on the infringement of patents 156 and 361. The decission would create a legal precedence cited within hundred of Canadian trials. The case was even noted in Canada for setting out "the test for patent infringement" and "the principales of purposive claim construction".

See also

General

Electromagnetic

Electroconvulsive

External Links

Patents

Notes

  1. The Government of Canada (GoC). Canadian Patents Database: Help: Bibliographic and Text Data Fields. Department: Industry Canada. Agency: Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), Accessed 26-03-2008.
    (Note: The "Bibliographic and Text Data Fields" explains that (54) is "English/French Titles", which means, "The name of the invention as provided by the applicant, or as translated by CIPO.")
    (Annotation: This is a help guide that explains The Canadian Patents Database. It explains accessibility, the Completeness of Date Fields, Patents, Patent Document Images, Language Considerations, International agreed Number for the Identification of (bibliographic) Data code (INID code), Patent Classifications, Text Data Fields, Administrative Status Definitions, Maintenance Fees Definitions, Payment History, Viewing Patent Document Images, Site Availability & Downloading Capabilities.)
  2. ^ The Government of Canada (GoC). CIPO - Patent - 1113156 : Electro-magnetic therapeutic system. Department: Industry Canada. Agency: Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), Accessed 26-03-2008.
  3. The Government of Canada (Gov). Canadian Patent Document: 1113156 Drawings, page. Figure 3, p.2 of 8. Accessed 26-03-2008
  4. The Government of Canada (Gov). Canadian Patent Document: 1150361 Drawings, page. Figure 7, p.7 of 16. Accessed 26-03-2008
  5. Note: This is a comparative analysis of the aforementioned Canadian patents. It only makes descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge. Per WP:PSTS, Misplaced Pages's Policy on Original Research, it is permissible for inclusion.
  6. ^ Free World Trust V. Électro Santé Inc. : I. Facts 4 No. 26406,. Supreme Court of Canada. Decision rendered 15 Dec. 2000. Accessed 29-03-2008
  7. CanLII: Search all CanLII Databases. Canadian Legal Information Institute. (Lexum and Federations of Law Societies of Canada). Searched for term "Free world trust". Accessed 29-03-2008.
  8. "Free World Trust" : Google News Archives Search. Google 2008. Searched for term "Free World Trust". pp.1-2. Accessed 29-03-2008.
  9. Sotiriadis, Bob et all. L’IMPACT D’UNE INTERPRÉTATION TÉLÉOLOGIQUE SUR DES RECOURS JUDICIAIRES EN MATIÈRE DE CONTREFAÇON DE BREVETS AU CANADA : 5.0 Les arrêts Whirpool et Free Wolrd Trust : les questions en jeu." Centre CDP Capital et LEGER ROBIC RICHARD, p.8. Accessed 30-03-2008.
Categories: