Revision as of 22:22, 9 April 2008 editMaha Pizza (talk | contribs)60 edits →Biographies of living people← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 9 April 2008 edit undoChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)43,032 edits Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articlesNext edit → | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Please respect Misplaced Pages's ] (BLPs). Your recent edits to ] added material sourced from WorldNetDaily and libertypost.net. The first has been reviewed previously and is not regarded as a reliable source; I've reviewed the second and I don't believe it meets the requirements set out in ]. Misplaced Pages's policy on BLPs '''requires''' that material added to such articles must be from reliable sources - see ]. This is a non-negotiable requirement. If you add that material again, it will be removed. -- ] (]) 18:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | Please respect Misplaced Pages's ] (BLPs). Your recent edits to ] added material sourced from WorldNetDaily and libertypost.net. The first has been reviewed previously and is not regarded as a reliable source; I've reviewed the second and I don't believe it meets the requirements set out in ]. Misplaced Pages's policy on BLPs '''requires''' that material added to such articles must be from reliable sources - see ]. This is a non-negotiable requirement. If you add that material again, it will be removed. -- ] (]) 18:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I have reviewed what you listed, but I completely disagree. The quotation in question appears in more than just one source, is quite verifiable, and is relevant to the subject at hand. In addition, you turned around and removed (quite unfairly) a link to a CNN transcript, which is obviously a verifiable resource. ] (]) 22:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | :I have reviewed what you listed, but I completely disagree. The quotation in question appears in more than just one source, is quite verifiable, and is relevant to the subject at hand. In addition, you turned around and removed (quite unfairly) a link to a CNN transcript, which is obviously a verifiable resource. ] (]) 22:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described below. | |||
*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. -- ] (]) 23:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:01, 9 April 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!
|
≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Keeping it neutral
I'm sure it was not your intention, but please be careful not to misrepresent/misquote source material.
Cheers, Jaakobou 12:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Replied to on user's talk page, http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Jaakobou#I_assume_you_left_me_a_message_re:_Pallywood.3F
- I made a reply on my page. Please remember to use 4 tildas ~~~~at the end of massages to leave a signature. I'm assuming you're new here, and it wouldn't hurt to make a quick run over the go by a basic Help:Contents/Getting_started and Help:Contents/Policies and guidelines pages.
- Cheers, Jaakobou 14:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Maha Pizza,
I'm keeping WP:BITE in mind, but I note to you not to change quotes in a way that changes them from the original source material or to make blind reverts that removes well cited material from articles.
That said, I remember my early days on wikipedia and I suggest you calm down on the WP:BATTLE atmosphere and discuss and take notes from more experienced editors before assuming bad faith.
Cheers, Jaakobou 15:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Just to make the content issue clear:
Hope that clears the quote issue up. Jaakobou 16:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Biographies of living people
Please respect Misplaced Pages's policy on biographies of living people (BLPs). Your recent edits to Johnny Sutton added material sourced from WorldNetDaily and libertypost.net. The first has been reviewed previously and is not regarded as a reliable source; I've reviewed the second and I don't believe it meets the requirements set out in WP:SOURCES. Misplaced Pages's policy on BLPs requires that material added to such articles must be from reliable sources - see WP:BLP#Sources. This is a non-negotiable requirement. If you add that material again, it will be removed. -- ChrisO (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have reviewed what you listed, but I completely disagree. The quotation in question appears in more than just one source, is quite verifiable, and is relevant to the subject at hand. In addition, you turned around and removed (quite unfairly) a link to a CNN transcript, which is obviously a verifiable resource. Maha Pizza (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles
As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)