| Revision as of 16:12, 14 April 2008 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,652 editsm Signing comment by Darkmage Rector - "→Itachi: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:13, 14 April 2008 edit undoSesshomaru (talk | contribs)Rollbackers40,876 edits removeNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| == Sockadelic == | == Sockadelic == | ||
| New editor at ], could quite possibly be another sock. Check out ] and see what you think. Thanks! ] (]) 16:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | New editor at ], could quite possibly be another sock. Check out ] and see what you think. Thanks! ] (]) 16:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Remove?== | |||
| I am intrigued to know why you remove most of the questions and comments that others put on your talk page. The purpose of these pages is to enable users to communicate with each other so why remove them? ] (]) 16:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Itachi == | |||
| The part about who the most powerful character is isn't spelled out, but everything else is undebatably true. Why does it keep getting edited away? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Revision as of 16:13, 14 April 2008
| This is a subpage of Sesshomaru's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Euthanasia
OK. Would you also care to look at the paragraph above? It too was original research, look at it:
Others respond to this argument by pointing out that if a nondisabled person attempts suicide, all measures possible are taken to save their lives. Suicidal people are often given involuntary medical treatment so that they will not die. This argument states that it is due to societal prejudice, namely that disabled people are of lower worth and that any unhappiness must be due to the disability, which results in greater support of voluntary euthanasia by disabled people than suicide by nondisabled people.
This does not cite any reference, and what I stated is logically absolutely true as a rebuttal to this sentence. None the less I do appreciate it wasn't the correct thing to do. Will you be removing this paragraph also? It is guilty of exactly the same issue. -- Nevermind, I removed it myself. Without a credible citation then this paragraph too is original research and since it's logically inaccurate - it would seem sensible to delete it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.12.253 (talk) 23:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks, my friend.
Timothy Perper (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
"Vandalism" of Tupac Shakur
How was my edit of 2pac vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bully25 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Sockadelic
New editor at Powers and abilities of the Hulk, could quite possibly be another sock. Check out Special:Contributions/TheJaff and see what you think. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)