Revision as of 04:51, 10 August 2005 edit67.150.120.190 (talk) →Controversies← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:13, 10 August 2005 edit undoJfdwolff (talk | contribs)Administrators81,547 edits expanded the "non-controversy" side of things, NPOVed the criticism sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''pharmaceutical company''' (or ''drug company'') is a company licensed to discover, develop, market and distribute ]. | A '''pharmaceutical company''' (or ''drug company'') is a company licensed to discover, develop, market and distribute ]. | ||
==History== | |||
Most large pharmaceutical companies were founded in the 20th century, and derive their market share from a few well-marketed preparations. Some of the reason for this is that the process of development, ] and marketing is expensive and takes a long time. After this the company will usually be granted a ] for the drug for about 20 years. Drugs are initially sold at a price higher than after competition is introduced. When the patent for the drug runs out, a generic is usually created by a competing company and released, causing the price to drop markedly. | |||
Most large pharmaceutical companies were founded in the late 19th and early 20th century, and derive their market share from a few well-marketed preparations. | |||
==Drug development== | |||
Drug development is considered a costly and intensive process. Of all compounds investigated for use in humans only a small fraction is eventually marketed, and only after heavy investment in ]s to determine the safety and efficacy of a compound. The cost for a new drug is estimated to be about $1 billion. Only after rigorous study and testing will the company be granted a ] for the drug for about 20 years. | |||
==Marketing== | |||
Drugs are initially sold at a price higher than after competition is introduced. When the patent for the drug runs out, a generic is usually created by a competing company and released, causing the price to drop markedly. | |||
Some medications only show to have safety issues after they are marketed, as clinical trials are of a limited size. ] ensures that after marketing the safety of a drug is monitored closely. In certain instances, its indication may need to be limited to particular patient groups, and in others the substance is withdrawn from the market completely. Where pharmaceutics have been shown to cause side-effects, ] has occurred, especially in countries where ] payouts are likely to be large. Due to high-profile cases leading to large compensations, most pharmaceutical companies endorse ]. | |||
Not all countries allow direct-to-consumer marketing. Where this applies, pharmaceutical companies may only advertise to doctors and other health professionals. | |||
==Controversies== | ==Controversies== | ||
Recently, some large companies have received a fair share of criticism. Examples are: | Recently, some large companies have received a fair share of criticism. Examples are: | ||
* Accusations of forging or suppressing clinical trial results to maximise uptake of some medications; | * Accusations of forging or suppressing clinical trial results to maximise uptake of some medications; | ||
* Accusations of manipulating the market for their products by showering doctors with free gifts |
* Accusations of manipulating the market for their products by showering doctors with free gifts | ||
* Too much advertising materials in the doctor's office, such as |
* Too much advertising materials in the doctor's office, such as clocks, poster ads, etc. | ||
* Aggressive representation by pharmaceutical companies' salespeople. | |||
* Critics don't like the pharmaceutical companies' salesman, who try to sell new drugs to the doctor during business hours, interrupting the doctor's schedule and making patients wait longer. | |||
* Sponsorship of ]s, with influence on the curriculum to discourage the teaching of alternative medicines. | |||
* Pharmaceutical companies donate millions to medical schools. In return, the schools teach doctors about the drugs the pharmaceutical company is selling. The medical school becomes a salesmen for the pharmaceutical companies. Pharmaceutical companies use their influence over the med schools to discourage the teaching of alternative medicines, such as herbs found in ] stores. Consequently, the doctors graduating from med school know nothing of natural alternatives, critics say. | |||
* Criticism for keeping the price of ]ed ] medication artificially high, limiting theraputic options for patients in the ], where the most people have AIDs. The patents, enforced worldwide by the ], bar the cheap generic manufacture of these medications, and third world countries often lack the economic resources to purchase expensive brand-name drugs from their American and European manufacturers. Pharmaceutical companies claim that lowering the price will not generate enough ]s, and cannot be justified given these drugs' high development costs. Proposals to allow the manufacture generic AIDS drugs are not without controversy; it is sometimes claimed that this might cause pharmaceutical companies to move away from AIDS drug research and focus their research on other, more profitable areas. In March of ], ] was sued by 41 pharmaceutical companies for their ], which allowed the import and generic production of cheap AIDS drugs. The case was later dropped after protest around the world. Eventually, the patents for the ] drugs will expire, allowing cheap generics on the market. By then, millions will die who could have been saved. | * Criticism for keeping the price of ]ed ] medication artificially high, limiting theraputic options for patients in the ], where the most people have AIDs. The patents, enforced worldwide by the ], bar the cheap generic manufacture of these medications, and third world countries often lack the economic resources to purchase expensive brand-name drugs from their American and European manufacturers. Pharmaceutical companies claim that lowering the price will not generate enough ]s, and cannot be justified given these drugs' high development costs. Proposals to allow the manufacture generic AIDS drugs are not without controversy; it is sometimes claimed that this might cause pharmaceutical companies to move away from AIDS drug research and focus their research on other, more profitable areas. In March of ], ] was sued by 41 pharmaceutical companies for their ], which allowed the import and generic production of cheap AIDS drugs. The case was later dropped after protest around the world. Eventually, the patents for the ] drugs will expire, allowing cheap generics on the market. By then, millions will die who could have been saved. | ||
Line 18: | Line 29: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 10 August 2005
A pharmaceutical company (or drug company) is a company licensed to discover, develop, market and distribute drugs.
History
Most large pharmaceutical companies were founded in the late 19th and early 20th century, and derive their market share from a few well-marketed preparations.
Drug development
Drug development is considered a costly and intensive process. Of all compounds investigated for use in humans only a small fraction is eventually marketed, and only after heavy investment in clinical trials to determine the safety and efficacy of a compound. The cost for a new drug is estimated to be about $1 billion. Only after rigorous study and testing will the company be granted a patent for the drug for about 20 years.
Marketing
Drugs are initially sold at a price higher than after competition is introduced. When the patent for the drug runs out, a generic is usually created by a competing company and released, causing the price to drop markedly.
Some medications only show to have safety issues after they are marketed, as clinical trials are of a limited size. Post-marketing surveillance ensures that after marketing the safety of a drug is monitored closely. In certain instances, its indication may need to be limited to particular patient groups, and in others the substance is withdrawn from the market completely. Where pharmaceutics have been shown to cause side-effects, civil action has occurred, especially in countries where tort payouts are likely to be large. Due to high-profile cases leading to large compensations, most pharmaceutical companies endorse tort reform.
Not all countries allow direct-to-consumer marketing. Where this applies, pharmaceutical companies may only advertise to doctors and other health professionals.
Controversies
Recently, some large companies have received a fair share of criticism. Examples are:
- Accusations of forging or suppressing clinical trial results to maximise uptake of some medications;
- Accusations of manipulating the market for their products by showering doctors with free gifts
- Too much advertising materials in the doctor's office, such as clocks, poster ads, etc.
- Aggressive representation by pharmaceutical companies' salespeople.
- Sponsorship of medical schools, with influence on the curriculum to discourage the teaching of alternative medicines.
- Criticism for keeping the price of patented AIDS medication artificially high, limiting theraputic options for patients in the Third World, where the most people have AIDs. The patents, enforced worldwide by the World Trade Organization, bar the cheap generic manufacture of these medications, and third world countries often lack the economic resources to purchase expensive brand-name drugs from their American and European manufacturers. Pharmaceutical companies claim that lowering the price will not generate enough profits, and cannot be justified given these drugs' high development costs. Proposals to allow the manufacture generic AIDS drugs are not without controversy; it is sometimes claimed that this might cause pharmaceutical companies to move away from AIDS drug research and focus their research on other, more profitable areas. In March of 2001, South Africa was sued by 41 pharmaceutical companies for their Medicines Act, which allowed the import and generic production of cheap AIDS drugs. The case was later dropped after protest around the world. Eventually, the patents for the AIDS drugs will expire, allowing cheap generics on the market. By then, millions will die who could have been saved.
Bibliography
- Ray Moynihan, Alan Cassels: Selling sickness: How the world's biggest pharmaceutical companies are turning us all into patients". Nation Books, New York, 2005.
- Merrill Goozner: The $800 million pill. University of California Press, Berkeley, 2004, 297 S. ISBN 0-520-23945-8.
- Marcia Angell: The truth about the drug companies. Random House, New York, 2004, 305 S. ISBN 0-375-50846-5.