| Revision as of 02:24, 21 April 2008 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,275 edits →Robertson's "reflections": arbitration enforcement← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:36, 21 April 2008 edit undoRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 edits →BanNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ==Arbitration enforcement== | ==Arbitration enforcement== | ||
| See ] <sup>]</sup> 02:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | See ] <sup>]</sup> 02:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Ban== | |||
| For reasons described by Jehochman pertaining to recent edit of yours], I am invoking the arbitration committee's decision . I am banning you from the September 11 attack article and talk page, and the articles and talk pages of all related articles. ] (]) 04:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 21 April 2008
User_talk:Thomas_Basboll/Archive
Your note
Done. SlimVirgin 07:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Robertson's "reflections"
In an interview with Robertson he stated that quote and was asked about the other engineers not knowing of the study. NIST said they could not examine the study because Robertson told them he lost it. I'll see if I can find the interview. I may have posted the link before in talk as this was discussed last year when I tried to have Skillings white paper given more weight than Robertsons study but as i have a crappy dialup I can't check back too far without my comp timing out. Wayne (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
See Jehochman 02:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Ban
For reasons described by Jehochman pertaining to this recent edit of yours], I am invoking the arbitration committee's decision here. I am banning you from the September 11 attack article and talk page, and the articles and talk pages of all related articles. Raul654 (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)