| Revision as of 22:53, 10 August 2005 editEvercat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,518 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:36, 11 August 2005 edit undoTznkai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,985 edits WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| : Though having said that, a little move and it now fits in better... ] 22:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC) | : Though having said that, a little move and it now fits in better... ] 22:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning == | |||
| You are about to breach ]. This will result in a 24 hour ban. | |||
| You are in breach of ] Using HTML comments to argue with other editors in the article is not acceptable. | |||
| You may be in breach of ], please keep a cooperative attitude. Saying things are "non-negotiable" does not create a civil enviroment. --] 00:36, 11 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:36, 11 August 2005
Welcome!
Hi LucaviX! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Dunc|☺ 23:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello. I wrote most of the person article and it most certainly is not right leaning. I'm a left-wing pro-choicer, but I do try to write from an NPOV if I can. What exactly is the problem? Evercat 00:28, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
And why do you consistently remove discussion of the problem that babies have rather limited mental abilities? I mean, do you disagree that their mental abilities seem no more impressive than many animals? Evercat 00:40, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Could you please, please put comments in the talk page, e.g. Talk:Person, not HTML comments in the article itself... Evercat 19:18, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Is "personhood theory" some specific school of thought? I mean, are there named individuals one could mention as representative of the theory? How big is the "movement", if I can call it that? If it really is a significant emerging idea, it could warrant a substantial subsection of the person page. At the moment it isn't really fleshed out and doesn't seem to fit well. Evercat 22:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Though having said that, a little move and it now fits in better... Evercat 22:53, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Warning
You are about to breach WP:3RR. This will result in a 24 hour ban.
You are in breach of WP:NOT Using HTML comments to argue with other editors in the article is not acceptable.
You may be in breach of WP:Civility, please keep a cooperative attitude. Saying things are "non-negotiable" does not create a civil enviroment. --Tznkai 00:36, 11 August 2005 (UTC)